谷歌科学计算引擎性能的早期观察

Zheng Li, L. O'Brien, R. Ranjan, Miranda Zhang
{"title":"谷歌科学计算引擎性能的早期观察","authors":"Zheng Li, L. O'Brien, R. Ranjan, Miranda Zhang","doi":"10.1109/CloudCom.2013.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Cloud computing emerged for business applications in industry, public Cloud services have been widely accepted and encouraged for scientific computing in academia. The recently available Google Compute Engine (GCE) is claimed to support high-performance and computationally intensive tasks, while little evaluation studies can be found to reveal GCE's scientific capabilities. Considering that fundamental performance benchmarking is the strategy of early-stage evaluation of new Cloud services, we followed the Cloud Evaluation Experiment Methodology (CEEM) to benchmark GCE and also compare it with Amazon EC2, to help understand the elementary capability of GCE for dealing with scientific problems. The experimental results and analyses show both potential advantages of, and possible threats to applying GCE to scientific computing. For example, compared to Amazon's EC2 service, GCE may better suit applications that require frequent disk operations, while it may not be ready yet for single VM-based parallel computing. Following the same evaluation methodology, different evaluators can replicate and/or supplement this fundamental evaluation of GCE. Based on the fundamental evaluation results, suitable GCE environments can be further established for case studies of solving real science problems.","PeriodicalId":198053,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Observations on Performance of Google Compute Engine for Scientific Computing\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Li, L. O'Brien, R. Ranjan, Miranda Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CloudCom.2013.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although Cloud computing emerged for business applications in industry, public Cloud services have been widely accepted and encouraged for scientific computing in academia. The recently available Google Compute Engine (GCE) is claimed to support high-performance and computationally intensive tasks, while little evaluation studies can be found to reveal GCE's scientific capabilities. Considering that fundamental performance benchmarking is the strategy of early-stage evaluation of new Cloud services, we followed the Cloud Evaluation Experiment Methodology (CEEM) to benchmark GCE and also compare it with Amazon EC2, to help understand the elementary capability of GCE for dealing with scientific problems. The experimental results and analyses show both potential advantages of, and possible threats to applying GCE to scientific computing. For example, compared to Amazon's EC2 service, GCE may better suit applications that require frequent disk operations, while it may not be ready yet for single VM-based parallel computing. Following the same evaluation methodology, different evaluators can replicate and/or supplement this fundamental evaluation of GCE. Based on the fundamental evaluation results, suitable GCE environments can be further established for case studies of solving real science problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2013.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2013.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

虽然云计算是为工业中的业务应用而出现的,但公共云服务已被学术界广泛接受并鼓励用于科学计算。最近推出的谷歌计算引擎(GCE)据称支持高性能和计算密集型任务,但很少有评估研究可以揭示GCE的科学能力。考虑到基础性能基准测试是对新云服务进行早期评估的策略,我们遵循云评估实验方法论(Cloud evaluation Experiment Methodology, CEEM)对GCE进行基准测试,并将其与Amazon EC2进行比较,以帮助了解GCE处理科学问题的基本能力。实验结果和分析显示了GCE在科学计算中的潜在优势和可能的威胁。例如,与Amazon的EC2服务相比,GCE可能更适合需要频繁磁盘操作的应用程序,而它可能还没有为基于单个vm的并行计算做好准备。遵循相同的评估方法,不同的评估人员可以复制和/或补充GCE的基本评估。在基础评价结果的基础上,进一步建立适合于解决实际科学问题的案例研究的GCE环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Observations on Performance of Google Compute Engine for Scientific Computing
Although Cloud computing emerged for business applications in industry, public Cloud services have been widely accepted and encouraged for scientific computing in academia. The recently available Google Compute Engine (GCE) is claimed to support high-performance and computationally intensive tasks, while little evaluation studies can be found to reveal GCE's scientific capabilities. Considering that fundamental performance benchmarking is the strategy of early-stage evaluation of new Cloud services, we followed the Cloud Evaluation Experiment Methodology (CEEM) to benchmark GCE and also compare it with Amazon EC2, to help understand the elementary capability of GCE for dealing with scientific problems. The experimental results and analyses show both potential advantages of, and possible threats to applying GCE to scientific computing. For example, compared to Amazon's EC2 service, GCE may better suit applications that require frequent disk operations, while it may not be ready yet for single VM-based parallel computing. Following the same evaluation methodology, different evaluators can replicate and/or supplement this fundamental evaluation of GCE. Based on the fundamental evaluation results, suitable GCE environments can be further established for case studies of solving real science problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信