Firman Firdaus Has, Solihin, Rully Nurhasan Ramadani
{"title":"Evaluasi Kinerja Crushing Plant Menggunakan Metode OEE dan Hubungannya dengan Production Rate Index (PRI) di PT Gunung Lagadar Abadi, Kecamatan Margaasih, Kabupaten Bandung, Provinsi Jawa Barat","authors":"Firman Firdaus Has, Solihin, Rully Nurhasan Ramadani","doi":"10.29313/bcsme.v2i2.3594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. PT Gunung Lagadar Abadi has a problem with tools that are less effective in achieving production, in order to be able to streamline the performance of these tools, it is necessary to do an assessment of the problems, one of which is in the mining processing area where in a crushing plant unit there is a crusher consisting of 3 jaw primary crusher, secondary jaw crusher and tertiary cone crusher parts. The tool has continuity in a work system. At the primary crusher stage, the results obtained are Mechanical Availability (MA) 96.64%, Physical Availability (PA) 96.78%, Use of Availability (UA) 95.69%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 92.61%, and Production rate index (PRI) 35.10%. Furthermore, in the secondary crusher stage, the results obtained are Mechanical Availability (MA) 97.64%, Physical Availability (PA) 97.75%, Use of Availability (UA) 95.15%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 93.01%, and Production rate index (PRI) 93.56%. In the last stage of tertiary crushing, the results obtained are Mechanical Availability (MA) 98.64%, Physical Availability (PA) 98.66%, Use of Availability (UA) 98.55%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 97.23% and Production rate index (PRI) 33.35%, and the resulting OEE 49.29%. Based on the calculation results of the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) value, which is 49.29%, it can be diagnosed that the overall equipment working on the crushing plant unit is not effective because it is far from an acceptable benchmark value of 85%, there are three components (availability, performance, rate of quality product) which is the biggest problem, one of which is the rate of quality product which is less than 85% so that the resulting production rate index (PRI) is small because the mechanical equipment to produce production does not work in accordance with its capacity, which at least works up to 85%, meanwhile the availability parameter is not a problem because the resulting value is more than 95% as well as the performance parameter. \nAbstrak. PT Gunung Lagadar Abadi memiliki permasalahan alat yang kurang efektif dalam mencapai produksi, guna untuk dapat mengefektifkan kinerja alat tersebut, perlu dilakukannya pengkajian terhadap permasalahan – permasalahan yang salah satunya berada pada area pengolahan tambang dimana pada suatu unit crushing plant terdapat alat peremuk yang terdiri dari 3 bagian jaw primary crusher, jaw secondary crusher dan tertiary cone crusher. Alat tersebut memiliki kesinambungan dalam suatu sistem kerja. Pada tahap primary crusher diperoleh hasil Mechanical Availability (MA) 96,64%, Phyisical Availability (PA) 96,78%, Use of Availability (UA) 95,69%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 92,61%, dan Production rate index (PRI) 35,10%. Selanjutnya pada tahap secoundary crusher diperolah hasil Mechanical Availability(MA) 97,64%, Phyisical Availability (PA) 97,75%, Use of Availability (UA) 95,15%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 93,01%, dan Production rate index (PRI) 93,56%. Pada tahap terakhir tertiary crushing diperoleh hasil Mechanical Availability (MA) 98,64%, Phyisical Availability (PA) 98,66%, Use of Availability (UA) 98,55%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 97,23% danProduction rate index (PRI) 33,35%, dan OEE yang dihasilkan 49,29%. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan nilai overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) yaitu sebesar 49,29%, sehingga dapat didiagnosa bahwa keseluruhan alat yang bekerja pada unit crushing plant tidak efektif dikarenakan jauh dari nilai standar yang dapat diterima yaitu sebesar 85%, terdapat tiga komponen (availability, performance, rate ofe quality product) yang menjadi permasalahan tersebesar salah satunya pada rate ofe quality product yang kurang dari 85% sehinga nilai production rate index (PRI) yang dihasilkan kecil karena alat mekanis untuk menghasilkan produksi tidak bekerja sesuai dengan kapasitasnya yang setidaknya alat bekerja mencapai 85%, sementara itu parameter availability tidak menjadi permasalahan dikarenakan nilai yang dihasilkan lebih dari 95% begitu pula dengan parameter performance.","PeriodicalId":187584,"journal":{"name":"Bandung Conference Series: Mining Engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bandung Conference Series: Mining Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsme.v2i2.3594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要。PT Gunung Lagadar Abadi在实现生产方面存在工具效率较低的问题,为了能够简化这些工具的性能,有必要对问题进行评估,其中一个问题是在采矿加工区,在破碎厂单元中有一个由3颚初级破碎机,二级颚破碎机和三级圆锥破碎机组成的破碎机。该工具在工作系统中具有连续性。在初级破碎阶段,得到的结果是机械有效度(MA) 96.64%,物理有效度(PA) 96.78%,利用率(UA) 95.69%,利用率(EU) 92.61%,生产率指数(PRI) 35.10%。在二级破碎阶段,得到的结果分别是机械有效度(MA) 97.64%、物理有效度(PA) 97.75%、利用率(UA) 95.15%、有效利用率(EU) 93.01%和生产率指数(PRI) 93.56%。在三次破碎的最后阶段,得到的结果分别是机械利用率(MA) 98.64%、物理利用率(PA) 98.66%、利用率(UA) 98.55%、有效利用率(EU) 97.23%、生产率指数(PRI) 33.35%,得到的综合利用效率(OEE) 49.29%。根据整体设备效率(OEE)值为49.29%的计算结果,可以诊断出破碎厂机组的整体设备工作效率不高,因为它与可接受的基准值85%相去甚远,其中有三个组成部分(可用性、性能、成品率)是最大的问题。其中一种是成品率低于85%,因此产生的生产率指数(PRI)很小,因为生产产品的机械设备没有按照其容量工作,至少工作到85%,同时可用性参数不是问题,因为结果值大于95%以及性能参数。Abstrak。PT Gunung Lagadar Abadi memiliki permasalahan alat yang kurang efektif dalam menapai产品,guna untuk dapat mengefektifkan kinerja alattersebut, perludilakukannya pengkajian terhadap permasalahan - permasalahan yang salah satunya berada pada地区pengolahan tambang dimana pada suatu单位破碎厂terdapat peremuk yang terdiri dari 3 bagian颚式初级破碎机,颚式二级破碎机和三级圆锥破碎机。阿拉伯文:阿拉伯文:阿拉伯文:阿拉伯文帕达塔哈普初级破碎机的机械利用率(MA)为96,64%,物理利用率(PA)为96,78%,利用率(UA)为95,69%,利用率(EU)为92,61%,产量指数(PRI)为35,10%。Selanjutnya pada tahap二级破碎机的机械利用率(MA)为97,64%,物理利用率(PA)为97,75%,利用率(UA)为95,15%,利用率(EU)为93,01%,产量指数(PRI)为93,56%。帕达塔哈特拉克尔三级破碎双石料机械利用率(MA) 98.64%,物理利用率(PA) 98.66%,利用率(UA) 98.55%,有效利用率(EU) 97.23%,产量指数(PRI) 33.35%,丹OEE阳地哈斯尔干49.29%。Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan nilai整体设备效率(OEE)为49.29%,sehinga dapat诊断为49.29%,sehinga dapat诊断为48.29%,bahawa keseluhan alatang bekerja patada单元破碎厂tetekkarenakan jahuh dasniai标准杨dapat diterima yaitu sebasar 85%, terdapat titima komponen(可用性、性能、率ofe质量产品)杨menjadi permasalahan tersebesar salah satunya篇率ofe优质产品杨kurang达里语85% sehinga汝生产率指数(PRI)杨dihasilkan kecil林嘉欣alat mekanis为她menghasilkan produksi有些bekerja sesuai dengan kapasitasnya杨setidaknya alat bekerja mencapai 85%, sementara itu参数可用性有些menjadi permasalahan dikarenakan汝杨dihasilkan lebih达里语95% begitu普拉dengan参数性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluasi Kinerja Crushing Plant Menggunakan Metode OEE dan Hubungannya dengan Production Rate Index (PRI) di PT Gunung Lagadar Abadi, Kecamatan Margaasih, Kabupaten Bandung, Provinsi Jawa Barat
Abstract. PT Gunung Lagadar Abadi has a problem with tools that are less effective in achieving production, in order to be able to streamline the performance of these tools, it is necessary to do an assessment of the problems, one of which is in the mining processing area where in a crushing plant unit there is a crusher consisting of 3 jaw primary crusher, secondary jaw crusher and tertiary cone crusher parts. The tool has continuity in a work system. At the primary crusher stage, the results obtained are Mechanical Availability (MA) 96.64%, Physical Availability (PA) 96.78%, Use of Availability (UA) 95.69%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 92.61%, and Production rate index (PRI) 35.10%. Furthermore, in the secondary crusher stage, the results obtained are Mechanical Availability (MA) 97.64%, Physical Availability (PA) 97.75%, Use of Availability (UA) 95.15%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 93.01%, and Production rate index (PRI) 93.56%. In the last stage of tertiary crushing, the results obtained are Mechanical Availability (MA) 98.64%, Physical Availability (PA) 98.66%, Use of Availability (UA) 98.55%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 97.23% and Production rate index (PRI) 33.35%, and the resulting OEE 49.29%. Based on the calculation results of the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) value, which is 49.29%, it can be diagnosed that the overall equipment working on the crushing plant unit is not effective because it is far from an acceptable benchmark value of 85%, there are three components (availability, performance, rate of quality product) which is the biggest problem, one of which is the rate of quality product which is less than 85% so that the resulting production rate index (PRI) is small because the mechanical equipment to produce production does not work in accordance with its capacity, which at least works up to 85%, meanwhile the availability parameter is not a problem because the resulting value is more than 95% as well as the performance parameter. Abstrak. PT Gunung Lagadar Abadi memiliki permasalahan alat yang kurang efektif dalam mencapai produksi, guna untuk dapat mengefektifkan kinerja alat tersebut, perlu dilakukannya pengkajian terhadap permasalahan – permasalahan yang salah satunya berada pada area pengolahan tambang dimana pada suatu unit crushing plant terdapat alat peremuk yang terdiri dari 3 bagian jaw primary crusher, jaw secondary crusher dan tertiary cone crusher. Alat tersebut memiliki kesinambungan dalam suatu sistem kerja. Pada tahap primary crusher diperoleh hasil Mechanical Availability (MA) 96,64%, Phyisical Availability (PA) 96,78%, Use of Availability (UA) 95,69%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 92,61%, dan Production rate index (PRI) 35,10%. Selanjutnya pada tahap secoundary crusher diperolah hasil Mechanical Availability(MA) 97,64%, Phyisical Availability (PA) 97,75%, Use of Availability (UA) 95,15%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 93,01%, dan Production rate index (PRI) 93,56%. Pada tahap terakhir tertiary crushing diperoleh hasil Mechanical Availability (MA) 98,64%, Phyisical Availability (PA) 98,66%, Use of Availability (UA) 98,55%, Effective of Utilization (EU) 97,23% danProduction rate index (PRI) 33,35%, dan OEE yang dihasilkan 49,29%. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan nilai overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) yaitu sebesar 49,29%, sehingga dapat didiagnosa bahwa keseluruhan alat yang bekerja pada unit crushing plant tidak efektif dikarenakan jauh dari nilai standar yang dapat diterima yaitu sebesar 85%, terdapat tiga komponen (availability, performance, rate ofe quality product) yang menjadi permasalahan tersebesar salah satunya pada rate ofe quality product yang kurang dari 85% sehinga nilai production rate index (PRI) yang dihasilkan kecil karena alat mekanis untuk menghasilkan produksi tidak bekerja sesuai dengan kapasitasnya yang setidaknya alat bekerja mencapai 85%, sementara itu parameter availability tidak menjadi permasalahan dikarenakan nilai yang dihasilkan lebih dari 95% begitu pula dengan parameter performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信