分时和分焦平面偏振计的性能比较

Pierre-Jean Lapray, L. Bigué
{"title":"分时和分焦平面偏振计的性能比较","authors":"Pierre-Jean Lapray, L. Bigué","doi":"10.1117/12.2688566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two typical instruments can be employed for linear polarization imaging: a rotating polarizer in front of a classical monochrome camera (division of time), or a dedicated sensor with a polarization filter array (division of focal-plane). The last method enables the snapshot acquisition of the linear polarization properties of the light with a compact and affordable instrument. The rotating polarizer method has until now been preferred when good polarimetric precision is required. It is still unclear how these two techniques perform comparatively in terms of polarimetric accuracy. This paper provides a practical comparison between the two methods, and evaluates the effect of pre-processing applied on raw images to counterbalance the differences.","PeriodicalId":295011,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of division of time and division of focal plan polarimeters\",\"authors\":\"Pierre-Jean Lapray, L. Bigué\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2688566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two typical instruments can be employed for linear polarization imaging: a rotating polarizer in front of a classical monochrome camera (division of time), or a dedicated sensor with a polarization filter array (division of focal-plane). The last method enables the snapshot acquisition of the linear polarization properties of the light with a compact and affordable instrument. The rotating polarizer method has until now been preferred when good polarimetric precision is required. It is still unclear how these two techniques perform comparatively in terms of polarimetric accuracy. This paper provides a practical comparison between the two methods, and evaluates the effect of pre-processing applied on raw images to counterbalance the differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":295011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2688566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2688566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两种典型的仪器可以用于线偏振成像:在经典单色相机前的旋转偏振器(时间划分),或专用传感器与偏振滤波器阵列(焦平面划分)。最后一种方法使光的线性偏振特性的快照采集与紧凑和负担得起的仪器。旋转偏振片法至今仍是需要良好偏振精度时的首选方法。目前还不清楚这两种技术在极化精度方面表现如何。本文提供了两种方法之间的实际比较,并评估了对原始图像进行预处理以抵消差异的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance comparison of division of time and division of focal plan polarimeters
Two typical instruments can be employed for linear polarization imaging: a rotating polarizer in front of a classical monochrome camera (division of time), or a dedicated sensor with a polarization filter array (division of focal-plane). The last method enables the snapshot acquisition of the linear polarization properties of the light with a compact and affordable instrument. The rotating polarizer method has until now been preferred when good polarimetric precision is required. It is still unclear how these two techniques perform comparatively in terms of polarimetric accuracy. This paper provides a practical comparison between the two methods, and evaluates the effect of pre-processing applied on raw images to counterbalance the differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信