{"title":"Порівняння ефективності рідинної ресусцитації хворих із септичним шоком розчинами рінгер-малат та ізотонічним розчином натрію хлориду","authors":"Цзо Тінлань, Ф. С. Глумчер, Є. В. Дьомін","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.4(85).2018.151504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the key elements of therapy for sepsis and septic shock is the fluid replacement. Current guidelines suggests an insfusion of at least 30 ml / kg of crystalloid in the first three hours, and if necessary, more. Preference is given to balanced crystalloid solutions, but the choice of a particular solution remains unclear. A randomized, controlled study of the “Ringer-Malat” balanced crystalloid solution was performed, compared with isotonic saline for primary resuscitation of septic shock patients. The study involved 48 patients randomized to ringer malate (experimental) and 0.9% sodium chloride (control) group. The 30-day mortality rate was not significantly different between the groups (20.0% and 21.4% respectively, p = 0.521), but the trend was noted for less time on vasopressor support (58.2 versus 74.3 hours, respectively, p = 0.072), higher delivery of oxygen (1064.26 vs. 612.38 ml / min, p <0.001), greater clearance of lactate (22.14% vs. 16.28% p <0.001). In the Ringer Malate group, no cases of hyperchloremic acidosis were noted, and in the control group there were 3 cases (13.04%). Thus, the use of balanced crystalloids (in particular, Ringer Malat) allows for better results in the treatment of septic shock compared with isotonic sodium chloride solution, although additional studies on a larger scale are needed to determine the effect on mortality.","PeriodicalId":355172,"journal":{"name":"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.4(85).2018.151504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
脓毒症和感染性休克治疗的关键因素之一是补液。目前的指导方针建议在头三个小时内至少输液30ml / kg的晶体,必要时可以更多。优先考虑平衡的晶体溶液,但选择特定的溶液仍不清楚。进行了一项随机对照研究,比较了“Ringer-Malat”平衡晶体溶液与等渗生理盐水用于感染性休克患者的初级复苏。48例患者随机分为苹果酸林格组(实验组)和0.9%氯化钠组(对照组)。30天死亡率在两组间无显著差异(分别为20.0%和21.4%,p = 0.521),但血管加压剂支持时间较短(分别为58.2和74.3小时,p = 0.072)、供氧量较高(1064.26和612.38 ml / min, p <0.001)、乳酸清除率较高(22.14%和16.28% p <0.001)。苹果酸林格组无高氯血症性酸中毒,对照组3例(13.04%)。因此,与等渗氯化钠溶液相比,使用平衡晶体(特别是林格玛拉特)治疗感染性休克的效果更好,尽管还需要更大规模的研究来确定其对死亡率的影响。
Порівняння ефективності рідинної ресусцитації хворих із септичним шоком розчинами рінгер-малат та ізотонічним розчином натрію хлориду
One of the key elements of therapy for sepsis and septic shock is the fluid replacement. Current guidelines suggests an insfusion of at least 30 ml / kg of crystalloid in the first three hours, and if necessary, more. Preference is given to balanced crystalloid solutions, but the choice of a particular solution remains unclear. A randomized, controlled study of the “Ringer-Malat” balanced crystalloid solution was performed, compared with isotonic saline for primary resuscitation of septic shock patients. The study involved 48 patients randomized to ringer malate (experimental) and 0.9% sodium chloride (control) group. The 30-day mortality rate was not significantly different between the groups (20.0% and 21.4% respectively, p = 0.521), but the trend was noted for less time on vasopressor support (58.2 versus 74.3 hours, respectively, p = 0.072), higher delivery of oxygen (1064.26 vs. 612.38 ml / min, p <0.001), greater clearance of lactate (22.14% vs. 16.28% p <0.001). In the Ringer Malate group, no cases of hyperchloremic acidosis were noted, and in the control group there were 3 cases (13.04%). Thus, the use of balanced crystalloids (in particular, Ringer Malat) allows for better results in the treatment of septic shock compared with isotonic sodium chloride solution, although additional studies on a larger scale are needed to determine the effect on mortality.