在各种设备上创建的动态生物特征签名的稳定性

V. Smejkal, J. Kodl, L. Sieger, Frantisek Hortai, P. Tesar
{"title":"在各种设备上创建的动态生物特征签名的稳定性","authors":"V. Smejkal, J. Kodl, L. Sieger, Frantisek Hortai, P. Tesar","doi":"10.1109/CCST.2017.8167814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper directly follows on from the prior research on the dynamic biometric signature (DBS), its properties, security, its resistance to forgery, and its stability. In our experiments, we used all the available pads produced by Signotec, which differ from each other in terms of their design, the size of the signature field, resolution, sampling rate, and even the scanning method used — a regular pen or a special pen using the ERT (Electromagnetic Resonance Technology). A less heterogenous sample was used than in the previous cases, as the objective of the experiments was to demonstrate a potential change in the DBS connected with the use of a different device, nevertheless the size of the sample means it is sufficiently statistically representative. The results showed that irrespective of the device used, the stability of scanning of the dynamic biometric signature was high for each person. The signature variability did not significantly differ between the devices for individual people. Once again it was confirmed that the use of the first signature as a “trial”, not included in the results, reduces the signature variability for each participant.","PeriodicalId":371622,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability of a dynamic biometric signature created on various devices\",\"authors\":\"V. Smejkal, J. Kodl, L. Sieger, Frantisek Hortai, P. Tesar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCST.2017.8167814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper directly follows on from the prior research on the dynamic biometric signature (DBS), its properties, security, its resistance to forgery, and its stability. In our experiments, we used all the available pads produced by Signotec, which differ from each other in terms of their design, the size of the signature field, resolution, sampling rate, and even the scanning method used — a regular pen or a special pen using the ERT (Electromagnetic Resonance Technology). A less heterogenous sample was used than in the previous cases, as the objective of the experiments was to demonstrate a potential change in the DBS connected with the use of a different device, nevertheless the size of the sample means it is sufficiently statistically representative. The results showed that irrespective of the device used, the stability of scanning of the dynamic biometric signature was high for each person. The signature variability did not significantly differ between the devices for individual people. Once again it was confirmed that the use of the first signature as a “trial”, not included in the results, reduces the signature variability for each participant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2017.8167814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2017.8167814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文直接继承了前人对动态生物特征签名(DBS)的特性、安全性、抗伪造性和稳定性的研究。在我们的实验中,我们使用了siignotec生产的所有可用的pad,它们在设计、签名场的大小、分辨率、采样率甚至使用的扫描方法(普通笔或使用ERT(电磁共振技术)的特殊笔)方面都有所不同。与之前的案例相比,使用了较少的异质样本,因为实验的目的是证明与使用不同设备相关的DBS的潜在变化,然而样本的大小意味着它具有足够的统计代表性。结果表明,无论使用何种设备,对每个人来说,动态生物特征扫描的稳定性都很高。在不同的设备之间,个体的签名可变性没有显著差异。再次证实,使用第一个签名作为“试验”,不包括在结果中,减少了每个参与者的签名可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stability of a dynamic biometric signature created on various devices
The paper directly follows on from the prior research on the dynamic biometric signature (DBS), its properties, security, its resistance to forgery, and its stability. In our experiments, we used all the available pads produced by Signotec, which differ from each other in terms of their design, the size of the signature field, resolution, sampling rate, and even the scanning method used — a regular pen or a special pen using the ERT (Electromagnetic Resonance Technology). A less heterogenous sample was used than in the previous cases, as the objective of the experiments was to demonstrate a potential change in the DBS connected with the use of a different device, nevertheless the size of the sample means it is sufficiently statistically representative. The results showed that irrespective of the device used, the stability of scanning of the dynamic biometric signature was high for each person. The signature variability did not significantly differ between the devices for individual people. Once again it was confirmed that the use of the first signature as a “trial”, not included in the results, reduces the signature variability for each participant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信