在初级保健实践中,基于查询和定向的卫生信息交换的互补性

J. Vest, M. Unruh, L. Casalino, J. Shapiro
{"title":"在初级保健实践中,基于查询和定向的卫生信息交换的互补性","authors":"J. Vest, M. Unruh, L. Casalino, J. Shapiro","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocz134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nMany policymakers and advocates assume that directed and query-based health information exchange (HIE) work together to meet organizations' interoperability needs, but this is not grounded in a substantial evidence base. This study sought to clarify the relationship between the usage of these 2 approaches to HIE.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nSystem user log files from a regional HIE organization and electronic health record system were combined to model the usage of HIE associated with a patient visit at 3 federally qualified health centers in New York. Regression models tested the hypothesis that directed HIE usage was associated with query-based usage and adjusted for factors reflective of the FITT (Fit between Individuals, Task & Technology) framework. Follow-up interviews with 8 key informants helped interpret findings.\n\n\nRESULTS\nUsage of query-based HIE occurred in 3.1% of encounters and directed HIE in 23.5%. Query-based usage was 0.6 percentage points higher when directed HIE provided imaging information, and 4.8 percentage points higher when directed HIE provided clinical documents. The probability of query-based HIE was lower for specialist visits, higher for postdischarge visits, and higher for encounters with nurse practitioners. Informants used query-based HIE after directed HIE to obtain additional information, support transitions of care, or in cases of abnormal results.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nThe complementary nature of directed and query-based HIE indicates that both HIE functionalities should be incorporated into EHR Certification Criteria.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nQuantitative and qualitative findings suggest that directed and query-based HIE exist in a complementary manner in ambulatory care settings.","PeriodicalId":236137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice\",\"authors\":\"J. Vest, M. Unruh, L. Casalino, J. Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocz134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nMany policymakers and advocates assume that directed and query-based health information exchange (HIE) work together to meet organizations' interoperability needs, but this is not grounded in a substantial evidence base. This study sought to clarify the relationship between the usage of these 2 approaches to HIE.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nSystem user log files from a regional HIE organization and electronic health record system were combined to model the usage of HIE associated with a patient visit at 3 federally qualified health centers in New York. Regression models tested the hypothesis that directed HIE usage was associated with query-based usage and adjusted for factors reflective of the FITT (Fit between Individuals, Task & Technology) framework. Follow-up interviews with 8 key informants helped interpret findings.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nUsage of query-based HIE occurred in 3.1% of encounters and directed HIE in 23.5%. Query-based usage was 0.6 percentage points higher when directed HIE provided imaging information, and 4.8 percentage points higher when directed HIE provided clinical documents. The probability of query-based HIE was lower for specialist visits, higher for postdischarge visits, and higher for encounters with nurse practitioners. Informants used query-based HIE after directed HIE to obtain additional information, support transitions of care, or in cases of abnormal results.\\n\\n\\nDISCUSSION\\nThe complementary nature of directed and query-based HIE indicates that both HIE functionalities should be incorporated into EHR Certification Criteria.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nQuantitative and qualitative findings suggest that directed and query-based HIE exist in a complementary manner in ambulatory care settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

许多决策者和倡导者认为,定向和基于查询的健康信息交换(HIE)协同工作,以满足组织的互操作性需求,但这并没有坚实的证据基础。本研究旨在阐明这两种HIE治疗方法之间的关系。材料和方法将来自区域性HIE组织和电子健康记录系统的系统用户日志文件结合起来,对纽约3个联邦合格医疗中心的患者访问的HIE使用情况进行建模。回归模型检验了定向HIE使用与基于查询的使用相关的假设,并根据反映FITT(个人、任务和技术之间的契合)框架的因素进行了调整。对8名关键举报人的后续访谈有助于解释调查结果。结果问询性HIE发生率为3.1%,定向性HIE发生率为23.5%。当直接HIE提供影像学信息时,基于查询的使用率提高了0.6个百分点,当直接HIE提供临床文件时,基于查询的使用率提高了4.8个百分点。以查询为基础的HIE的概率在专科就诊时较低,在出院后就诊时较高,在与执业护士接触时较高。在指示HIE后,被调查者使用基于查询的HIE来获取额外的信息,支持护理的过渡,或者在出现异常结果的情况下。定向HIE和基于查询的HIE的互补性表明,这两种HIE功能都应纳入EHR认证标准。结论定量和定性研究结果表明,定向和基于查询的HIE在门诊环境中以互补的方式存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice
OBJECTIVE Many policymakers and advocates assume that directed and query-based health information exchange (HIE) work together to meet organizations' interoperability needs, but this is not grounded in a substantial evidence base. This study sought to clarify the relationship between the usage of these 2 approaches to HIE. MATERIALS AND METHODS System user log files from a regional HIE organization and electronic health record system were combined to model the usage of HIE associated with a patient visit at 3 federally qualified health centers in New York. Regression models tested the hypothesis that directed HIE usage was associated with query-based usage and adjusted for factors reflective of the FITT (Fit between Individuals, Task & Technology) framework. Follow-up interviews with 8 key informants helped interpret findings. RESULTS Usage of query-based HIE occurred in 3.1% of encounters and directed HIE in 23.5%. Query-based usage was 0.6 percentage points higher when directed HIE provided imaging information, and 4.8 percentage points higher when directed HIE provided clinical documents. The probability of query-based HIE was lower for specialist visits, higher for postdischarge visits, and higher for encounters with nurse practitioners. Informants used query-based HIE after directed HIE to obtain additional information, support transitions of care, or in cases of abnormal results. DISCUSSION The complementary nature of directed and query-based HIE indicates that both HIE functionalities should be incorporated into EHR Certification Criteria. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative and qualitative findings suggest that directed and query-based HIE exist in a complementary manner in ambulatory care settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信