试论沟通意愿和批判性思维在资优和非资优英语学习者词汇知识的接受性/生产性中的作用

K. Heidari, Naser Rashidi
{"title":"试论沟通意愿和批判性思维在资优和非资优英语学习者词汇知识的接受性/生产性中的作用","authors":"K. Heidari, Naser Rashidi","doi":"10.22099/JTLS.2020.35463.2750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TWillingness to Communicate (WTC) and vocabulary development have unanimously been considered as two essential goals of language pedagogy as they directly contribute to the ultimate purpose of language learning that is communicative competence development. This study looked into the role of Willingness to Communicate (WTC), as an individual differences construct, in the EFL learners' receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge to investigate whether or not the learners' WTC degree significantly affected their receptive/productive lexical knowledge. To this end, 112 EFL learners were selected as the participants of the study, and they were asked to sit for three instruments: a WTC questionnaire, a receptive lexical knowledge test, and a productive lexical knowledge test. Having gathered and analyzed the data through descriptive statistics and an independent samples t-test, the researchers found out that there was no significant difference between the high and low WTC learners in terms of their receptive lexical knowledge. However, a significant difference was observed between high and low WTC learners in terms of their productive vocabulary knowledge. The pedagogical implications of the study were also discussed.","PeriodicalId":150431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching Language Skills","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Role of Willingness to Communicate and Critical Thinking in Receptive/Productive Lexical Knowledge of Gifted and Non-Gifted EFL Learners\",\"authors\":\"K. Heidari, Naser Rashidi\",\"doi\":\"10.22099/JTLS.2020.35463.2750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"TWillingness to Communicate (WTC) and vocabulary development have unanimously been considered as two essential goals of language pedagogy as they directly contribute to the ultimate purpose of language learning that is communicative competence development. This study looked into the role of Willingness to Communicate (WTC), as an individual differences construct, in the EFL learners' receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge to investigate whether or not the learners' WTC degree significantly affected their receptive/productive lexical knowledge. To this end, 112 EFL learners were selected as the participants of the study, and they were asked to sit for three instruments: a WTC questionnaire, a receptive lexical knowledge test, and a productive lexical knowledge test. Having gathered and analyzed the data through descriptive statistics and an independent samples t-test, the researchers found out that there was no significant difference between the high and low WTC learners in terms of their receptive lexical knowledge. However, a significant difference was observed between high and low WTC learners in terms of their productive vocabulary knowledge. The pedagogical implications of the study were also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Teaching Language Skills\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Teaching Language Skills\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22099/JTLS.2020.35463.2750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching Language Skills","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22099/JTLS.2020.35463.2750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

交际意愿(WTC)和词汇发展一直被认为是语言教育学的两个基本目标,因为它们直接有助于语言学习的最终目的——交际能力的发展。本研究考察了交际意愿作为一种个体差异构式在英语学习者的接受性词汇知识和生产性词汇知识中的作用,以探讨学习者的交际意愿程度是否显著影响其接受性词汇知识和生产性词汇知识。为此,我们选择了112名英语学习者作为研究的参与者,并要求他们参加三种工具:WTC问卷,接受性词汇知识测试和生产性词汇知识测试。研究人员通过描述性统计和独立样本t检验对数据进行收集和分析,发现高、低WTC学习者在接受性词汇知识方面没有显著差异。然而,高、低WTC学习者在生产性词汇知识方面存在显著差异。本研究的教学意义也被讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Role of Willingness to Communicate and Critical Thinking in Receptive/Productive Lexical Knowledge of Gifted and Non-Gifted EFL Learners
TWillingness to Communicate (WTC) and vocabulary development have unanimously been considered as two essential goals of language pedagogy as they directly contribute to the ultimate purpose of language learning that is communicative competence development. This study looked into the role of Willingness to Communicate (WTC), as an individual differences construct, in the EFL learners' receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge to investigate whether or not the learners' WTC degree significantly affected their receptive/productive lexical knowledge. To this end, 112 EFL learners were selected as the participants of the study, and they were asked to sit for three instruments: a WTC questionnaire, a receptive lexical knowledge test, and a productive lexical knowledge test. Having gathered and analyzed the data through descriptive statistics and an independent samples t-test, the researchers found out that there was no significant difference between the high and low WTC learners in terms of their receptive lexical knowledge. However, a significant difference was observed between high and low WTC learners in terms of their productive vocabulary knowledge. The pedagogical implications of the study were also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信