音乐节目只为你的手和耳朵

S. Pauws, D. Bouwhuis, J. H. Eggen
{"title":"音乐节目只为你的手和耳朵","authors":"S. Pauws, D. Bouwhuis, J. H. Eggen","doi":"10.1037/e493362004-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental evaluation is presented of the usability properties of a multimodal interaction style for music programming. The experiment investigated task performance and learning of procedures while performing music programming tasks in the presence or absence of a visual display combined with a tactual and auditory interface. The participant's task was to compile a music programme as quickly as possible. Task performance was measured by compilation time and number of actions executed. Procedural knowledge was assessed by a posttask questionnaire. Participants performed equally efficiently, i.e .. not significantly differently, with and without a visual display, except for the first programming task. In the first task, performing a task without a visual display required significantly more time (approximately one additional minute) and more, but not significantly more, actions, probably due to explorative behaviour required to develop an internal representation of the interaction style. Earlier experience with a visual display did not improve task performance without a visual display. It also appeared that participants who had performed tasks non visually had learned more procedures. Nonvisual interaction requires the explicit discovery and memorization of procedures, which induces a higher degree of cognitive processing. It could therefore be demonstrated that tactual and auditory feedback can compensate for the visual modality in contextsof- use, in which visual display of information is impoverished or even absent. e.g.. portable devices, remote controls, and car equipment.","PeriodicalId":369207,"journal":{"name":"IPO Annual Progress Report","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Music programming for your hands and ears only\",\"authors\":\"S. Pauws, D. Bouwhuis, J. H. Eggen\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e493362004-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An experimental evaluation is presented of the usability properties of a multimodal interaction style for music programming. The experiment investigated task performance and learning of procedures while performing music programming tasks in the presence or absence of a visual display combined with a tactual and auditory interface. The participant's task was to compile a music programme as quickly as possible. Task performance was measured by compilation time and number of actions executed. Procedural knowledge was assessed by a posttask questionnaire. Participants performed equally efficiently, i.e .. not significantly differently, with and without a visual display, except for the first programming task. In the first task, performing a task without a visual display required significantly more time (approximately one additional minute) and more, but not significantly more, actions, probably due to explorative behaviour required to develop an internal representation of the interaction style. Earlier experience with a visual display did not improve task performance without a visual display. It also appeared that participants who had performed tasks non visually had learned more procedures. Nonvisual interaction requires the explicit discovery and memorization of procedures, which induces a higher degree of cognitive processing. It could therefore be demonstrated that tactual and auditory feedback can compensate for the visual modality in contextsof- use, in which visual display of information is impoverished or even absent. e.g.. portable devices, remote controls, and car equipment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IPO Annual Progress Report\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IPO Annual Progress Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e493362004-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPO Annual Progress Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e493362004-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对音乐节目多模态交互风格的可用性特性进行了实验评价。该实验调查了在有或没有视觉显示结合触觉和听觉界面的情况下,在执行音乐编程任务时的任务表现和程序学习。参与者的任务是尽快编写一个音乐节目。任务性能通过编译时间和执行的操作数量来衡量。程序知识通过任务后问卷进行评估。参与者的表现同样有效,即……除了第一个编程任务外,有视觉显示和没有视觉显示并没有明显的不同。在第一个任务中,执行一个没有视觉显示的任务需要更多的时间(大约额外一分钟)和更多的动作,但不是更多,这可能是由于开发交互风格的内部表示所需的探索行为。早期有视觉显示的经历并没有改善没有视觉显示的任务表现。研究还显示,非视觉任务的参与者学习了更多的程序。非视觉交互需要明确的发现和记忆过程,这导致了更高程度的认知加工。因此,可以证明,触觉和听觉反馈可以弥补视觉形式在软使用环境中,在视觉显示的信息是贫乏的,甚至没有。如. .便携式设备、遥控器和汽车设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Music programming for your hands and ears only
An experimental evaluation is presented of the usability properties of a multimodal interaction style for music programming. The experiment investigated task performance and learning of procedures while performing music programming tasks in the presence or absence of a visual display combined with a tactual and auditory interface. The participant's task was to compile a music programme as quickly as possible. Task performance was measured by compilation time and number of actions executed. Procedural knowledge was assessed by a posttask questionnaire. Participants performed equally efficiently, i.e .. not significantly differently, with and without a visual display, except for the first programming task. In the first task, performing a task without a visual display required significantly more time (approximately one additional minute) and more, but not significantly more, actions, probably due to explorative behaviour required to develop an internal representation of the interaction style. Earlier experience with a visual display did not improve task performance without a visual display. It also appeared that participants who had performed tasks non visually had learned more procedures. Nonvisual interaction requires the explicit discovery and memorization of procedures, which induces a higher degree of cognitive processing. It could therefore be demonstrated that tactual and auditory feedback can compensate for the visual modality in contextsof- use, in which visual display of information is impoverished or even absent. e.g.. portable devices, remote controls, and car equipment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信