{"title":"一种用于应急选择的子网解决方案的性能评估","authors":"C. Cheng, A.P.S. Melipoulos","doi":"10.1109/NAPS.1990.151389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors examine the computational efficiency of subnetwork solutions. A statistical approach is used to evaluate the performance of the subnetwork solution on several systems. The authors suggest that the efficiency of the subnetwork solution as compared to the full solution depends on the contingency type and the system size. For convenience, the sparsity-oriented subnetwork solution with fast forward and fast back (FF/FB) substitution of W.F. Tinney et al. (1985) is referred to as the subnetwork solution, while the conventional power flow solution with the full forward and back substitution is referred to as the direct solution. A brief description of the evaluation procedure is presented, followed with the evaluation results obtained from two large power systems. Possible application of the performance evaluation results is briefly discussed.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":330083,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual North American Power Symposium","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of a subnetwork solution for contingency selection\",\"authors\":\"C. Cheng, A.P.S. Melipoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAPS.1990.151389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors examine the computational efficiency of subnetwork solutions. A statistical approach is used to evaluate the performance of the subnetwork solution on several systems. The authors suggest that the efficiency of the subnetwork solution as compared to the full solution depends on the contingency type and the system size. For convenience, the sparsity-oriented subnetwork solution with fast forward and fast back (FF/FB) substitution of W.F. Tinney et al. (1985) is referred to as the subnetwork solution, while the conventional power flow solution with the full forward and back substitution is referred to as the direct solution. A brief description of the evaluation procedure is presented, followed with the evaluation results obtained from two large power systems. Possible application of the performance evaluation results is briefly discussed.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":330083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual North American Power Symposium\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual North American Power Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.1990.151389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual North American Power Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.1990.151389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
作者检验了子网解决方案的计算效率。采用统计方法评估了子网解决方案在多个系统上的性能。作者认为,与完整解决方案相比,子网解决方案的效率取决于偶然性类型和系统大小。为方便起见,将W.F. Tinney et al.(1985)采用快进快回(FF/FB)替代的面向稀疏的子网方案称为子网方案,将完全向前和向后替代的常规潮流方案称为直接方案。简要介绍了评估过程,并给出了两个大型电力系统的评估结果。简要讨论了性能评价结果的应用前景。
Performance evaluation of a subnetwork solution for contingency selection
The authors examine the computational efficiency of subnetwork solutions. A statistical approach is used to evaluate the performance of the subnetwork solution on several systems. The authors suggest that the efficiency of the subnetwork solution as compared to the full solution depends on the contingency type and the system size. For convenience, the sparsity-oriented subnetwork solution with fast forward and fast back (FF/FB) substitution of W.F. Tinney et al. (1985) is referred to as the subnetwork solution, while the conventional power flow solution with the full forward and back substitution is referred to as the direct solution. A brief description of the evaluation procedure is presented, followed with the evaluation results obtained from two large power systems. Possible application of the performance evaluation results is briefly discussed.<>