{"title":"税收对小银行贷款损失准备金的影响","authors":"B. Billings, Buagu Musazi","doi":"10.1504/AJFA.2008.019879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So far the earnings management literature has failed to establish the impact of taxes on the Loan Loss Provisions (LLPs) of financial institutions. We extend the discretionary LLP literature to a less studied area regarding the role of taxes in determining the behaviour of LLPs in a sample of 300 small banks in the period 1990–2004. Due to tax provisions that allow small banks to use LLPs, we find support for the hypothesis that taxes affect banks' discretionary LLPs. This finding is contrary to the findings of the few studies on this subject (Beatty et al., 1995; Scholes et al., 1990) that, using large banks, find little or no linkage between taxes and LLPs. We find that banks that were likely to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) tended to lower their LLP. In addition, low Marginal Tax Rate (MTR) banks tend to have greater LLP than high MTR banks. Although the results may not be generalisable to the general population of banks and because LLPs are a large proportion of banks' income, these findings are important for bank regulators and analysts who may want to analyse LLP drivers.","PeriodicalId":379725,"journal":{"name":"American J. of Finance and Accounting","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of taxes on small banks' loan loss provisions\",\"authors\":\"B. Billings, Buagu Musazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/AJFA.2008.019879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"So far the earnings management literature has failed to establish the impact of taxes on the Loan Loss Provisions (LLPs) of financial institutions. We extend the discretionary LLP literature to a less studied area regarding the role of taxes in determining the behaviour of LLPs in a sample of 300 small banks in the period 1990–2004. Due to tax provisions that allow small banks to use LLPs, we find support for the hypothesis that taxes affect banks' discretionary LLPs. This finding is contrary to the findings of the few studies on this subject (Beatty et al., 1995; Scholes et al., 1990) that, using large banks, find little or no linkage between taxes and LLPs. We find that banks that were likely to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) tended to lower their LLP. In addition, low Marginal Tax Rate (MTR) banks tend to have greater LLP than high MTR banks. Although the results may not be generalisable to the general population of banks and because LLPs are a large proportion of banks' income, these findings are important for bank regulators and analysts who may want to analyse LLP drivers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American J. of Finance and Accounting\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American J. of Finance and Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/AJFA.2008.019879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American J. of Finance and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/AJFA.2008.019879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
迄今为止,盈余管理文献未能确定税收对金融机构贷款损失准备金(llp)的影响。我们将自由裁量的LLP文献扩展到一个较少研究的领域,即在1990 - - 2004年期间300家小银行的样本中,税收在决定LLP行为中的作用。由于税收规定允许小银行使用有限责任合伙,我们发现税收影响银行自由裁量有限责任合伙的假设得到支持。这一发现与少数关于这一主题的研究结果相反(Beatty et al., 1995;Scholes et al., 1990),使用大型银行,发现税收和llp之间很少或没有联系。我们发现,可能支付替代性最低税(AMT)的银行倾向于降低其LLP。此外,低边际税率银行往往比高边际税率银行有更大的LLP。尽管结果可能不适用于银行的一般人群,并且因为LLP是银行收入的很大一部分,但这些发现对于可能想要分析LLP驱动因素的银行监管者和分析师来说很重要。
The effect of taxes on small banks' loan loss provisions
So far the earnings management literature has failed to establish the impact of taxes on the Loan Loss Provisions (LLPs) of financial institutions. We extend the discretionary LLP literature to a less studied area regarding the role of taxes in determining the behaviour of LLPs in a sample of 300 small banks in the period 1990–2004. Due to tax provisions that allow small banks to use LLPs, we find support for the hypothesis that taxes affect banks' discretionary LLPs. This finding is contrary to the findings of the few studies on this subject (Beatty et al., 1995; Scholes et al., 1990) that, using large banks, find little or no linkage between taxes and LLPs. We find that banks that were likely to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) tended to lower their LLP. In addition, low Marginal Tax Rate (MTR) banks tend to have greater LLP than high MTR banks. Although the results may not be generalisable to the general population of banks and because LLPs are a large proportion of banks' income, these findings are important for bank regulators and analysts who may want to analyse LLP drivers.