生物医学研究知情同意书中技术术语的接触和理解

I. Jeong, Dong-Hee Kim, Myung-Hee Kim, So Hee Kim, Dong-Wook Jeong, J. Shon
{"title":"生物医学研究知情同意书中技术术语的接触和理解","authors":"I. Jeong, Dong-Hee Kim, Myung-Hee Kim, So Hee Kim, Dong-Wook Jeong, J. Shon","doi":"10.1177/0092861511427878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This cross-sectional survey with 432 patients and 158 nurses investigated the exposure to and understanding of technical terms used in informed consent forms (ICFs) for biomedical research in the Republic of Korea. The percentage of positive responses, when asked if ever exposed to the study-related terms, ranged from 4.9% to 80.8% for patients and 22.8% to 99.4% for nurses. The term phase III was least recognized by both patients and nurses. The percentage of positive responses to “understanding the study-related terms well” ranged from 0.9% to 56.2% for patients and 5.1% to 70.9% for nurses. The average number of positive respondents, when asked if they understood each term well, statistically differed by age group, education, and exposure to clinical research for patients and by education and exposure to biomedical research for nurses. The low level of understanding of technical terms in ICFs should be improved by ensuring that sufficient explanations are provided to patients while obtaining informed consent and by replacing terms with more common and easily understandable words.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposure to and Understanding of Technical Terms in Informed Consent Forms for Biomedical Research\",\"authors\":\"I. Jeong, Dong-Hee Kim, Myung-Hee Kim, So Hee Kim, Dong-Wook Jeong, J. Shon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0092861511427878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This cross-sectional survey with 432 patients and 158 nurses investigated the exposure to and understanding of technical terms used in informed consent forms (ICFs) for biomedical research in the Republic of Korea. The percentage of positive responses, when asked if ever exposed to the study-related terms, ranged from 4.9% to 80.8% for patients and 22.8% to 99.4% for nurses. The term phase III was least recognized by both patients and nurses. The percentage of positive responses to “understanding the study-related terms well” ranged from 0.9% to 56.2% for patients and 5.1% to 70.9% for nurses. The average number of positive respondents, when asked if they understood each term well, statistically differed by age group, education, and exposure to clinical research for patients and by education and exposure to biomedical research for nurses. The low level of understanding of technical terms in ICFs should be improved by ensuring that sufficient explanations are provided to patients while obtaining informed consent and by replacing terms with more common and easily understandable words.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861511427878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861511427878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这项横断面调查调查了432名患者和158名护士对大韩民国生物医学研究知情同意书(ICFs)中使用的技术术语的接触和理解情况。当被问及是否接触过与研究相关的术语时,积极回答的百分比从4.9%到80.8%不等,护士的比例从22.8%到99.4%不等。患者和护士对第三阶段这个术语的认识程度最低。对“很好地理解研究相关术语”的积极回答比例,患者为0.9%至56.2%,护士为5.1%至70.9%。当被问及是否很好地理解每个术语时,持积极态度的受访者的平均人数因年龄、教育程度和对患者临床研究的接触程度以及对护士的教育程度和对生物医学研究的接触程度而有统计学差异。应通过确保在获得患者知情同意的同时向患者提供充分的解释,以及用更常见和更容易理解的词语取代术语,改善对ICFs中技术术语的低水平理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exposure to and Understanding of Technical Terms in Informed Consent Forms for Biomedical Research
This cross-sectional survey with 432 patients and 158 nurses investigated the exposure to and understanding of technical terms used in informed consent forms (ICFs) for biomedical research in the Republic of Korea. The percentage of positive responses, when asked if ever exposed to the study-related terms, ranged from 4.9% to 80.8% for patients and 22.8% to 99.4% for nurses. The term phase III was least recognized by both patients and nurses. The percentage of positive responses to “understanding the study-related terms well” ranged from 0.9% to 56.2% for patients and 5.1% to 70.9% for nurses. The average number of positive respondents, when asked if they understood each term well, statistically differed by age group, education, and exposure to clinical research for patients and by education and exposure to biomedical research for nurses. The low level of understanding of technical terms in ICFs should be improved by ensuring that sufficient explanations are provided to patients while obtaining informed consent and by replacing terms with more common and easily understandable words.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信