日立大学45号提案学生选择研究项目的支持系统采用了分析方法

Johan Pursaka, H. Hendri
{"title":"日立大学45号提案学生选择研究项目的支持系统采用了分析方法","authors":"Johan Pursaka, H. Hendri","doi":"10.26486/jisai.v3i2.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining the choice of a study program to continue their studies in higher education for some people is not easy, in addition to what criteria must be used as benchmarks as well as information about costs, what facilities are provided, what infrastructure supports lecture activities are also basic things that must be considered. not so well known by many prospective students. In determining the criteria that become the benchmark for assessment, people who know or are termed experts, the problem is if the choice of the designated study program is not in accordance with the characteristics of prospective students, it will be a separate obstacle in completing future studies. This study discusses the process of selecting a study program for prospective new students using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the most commonly used criteria such as costs, accreditation and facilities, which will be compared with all study programs at Proklamasi 45 University Yogyakarta. The results showed that the most recommended information engineering study program with a total weight of 0.1389 or 13.9% followed below that of mechanical engineering and industrial engineering with a total weight of 0.1367 or 13.7% and 0.1202 or 12, respectively. 0%.","PeriodicalId":431246,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Information System And Artificial Intelligence","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Program Studi Bagi Calon Mahasiswa Baru Pada Universitas Proklamasi 45 Yogyakarta Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process\",\"authors\":\"Johan Pursaka, H. Hendri\",\"doi\":\"10.26486/jisai.v3i2.186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Determining the choice of a study program to continue their studies in higher education for some people is not easy, in addition to what criteria must be used as benchmarks as well as information about costs, what facilities are provided, what infrastructure supports lecture activities are also basic things that must be considered. not so well known by many prospective students. In determining the criteria that become the benchmark for assessment, people who know or are termed experts, the problem is if the choice of the designated study program is not in accordance with the characteristics of prospective students, it will be a separate obstacle in completing future studies. This study discusses the process of selecting a study program for prospective new students using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the most commonly used criteria such as costs, accreditation and facilities, which will be compared with all study programs at Proklamasi 45 University Yogyakarta. The results showed that the most recommended information engineering study program with a total weight of 0.1389 or 13.9% followed below that of mechanical engineering and industrial engineering with a total weight of 0.1367 or 13.7% and 0.1202 or 12, respectively. 0%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Of Information System And Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Of Information System And Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26486/jisai.v3i2.186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Information System And Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26486/jisai.v3i2.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对于一些人来说,决定选择一个学习项目来继续他们在高等教育中的学习并不容易,除了必须使用什么标准作为基准以及有关成本的信息,提供什么设施,什么基础设施支持讲座活动也是必须考虑的基本事情。很多未来的学生都不太了解。在确定成为评价基准的标准时,了解或被称为专家的人的问题是,如果指定的学习项目的选择不符合未来学生的特点,这将成为完成未来学习的单独障碍。本研究讨论了基于最常用的标准,如成本,认证和设施,使用层次分析法(AHP)方法为未来的新生选择学习计划的过程,这将与Proklamasi 45 University Yogyakarta的所有学习计划进行比较。结果表明,信息工程专业的推荐度最高,总权重为0.1389(13.9%),其次是机械工程和工业工程专业,总权重分别为0.1367(13.7%)和0.1202(12)。0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Program Studi Bagi Calon Mahasiswa Baru Pada Universitas Proklamasi 45 Yogyakarta Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process
Determining the choice of a study program to continue their studies in higher education for some people is not easy, in addition to what criteria must be used as benchmarks as well as information about costs, what facilities are provided, what infrastructure supports lecture activities are also basic things that must be considered. not so well known by many prospective students. In determining the criteria that become the benchmark for assessment, people who know or are termed experts, the problem is if the choice of the designated study program is not in accordance with the characteristics of prospective students, it will be a separate obstacle in completing future studies. This study discusses the process of selecting a study program for prospective new students using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the most commonly used criteria such as costs, accreditation and facilities, which will be compared with all study programs at Proklamasi 45 University Yogyakarta. The results showed that the most recommended information engineering study program with a total weight of 0.1389 or 13.9% followed below that of mechanical engineering and industrial engineering with a total weight of 0.1367 or 13.7% and 0.1202 or 12, respectively. 0%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信