{"title":"《牛津大学手稿与赫伯特诗集》","authors":"Mario A. Di Cesare","doi":"10.1353/ghj.1983.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chief question about the Bodleian manuscript (Tanner MS. 307, referred to as B) must be its relationship to the text the author finally intended. As Hutchinson unpretentiously put it: \"An editor's business is to present the text as near to the author's intention as he has the means of judging; but this is not identical . . . with a mere reproduction of a copy which the author never saw ... or of the first edition, however much care was bestowed upon it by the original editor and by a scholarly printer.\"1","PeriodicalId":143254,"journal":{"name":"George Herbert Journal","volume":"2674 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Bodleian Manuscript and the Text of Herbert's Poems\",\"authors\":\"Mario A. Di Cesare\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ghj.1983.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chief question about the Bodleian manuscript (Tanner MS. 307, referred to as B) must be its relationship to the text the author finally intended. As Hutchinson unpretentiously put it: \\\"An editor's business is to present the text as near to the author's intention as he has the means of judging; but this is not identical . . . with a mere reproduction of a copy which the author never saw ... or of the first edition, however much care was bestowed upon it by the original editor and by a scholarly printer.\\\"1\",\"PeriodicalId\":143254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"George Herbert Journal\",\"volume\":\"2674 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"George Herbert Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ghj.1983.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"George Herbert Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ghj.1983.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Bodleian Manuscript and the Text of Herbert's Poems
The chief question about the Bodleian manuscript (Tanner MS. 307, referred to as B) must be its relationship to the text the author finally intended. As Hutchinson unpretentiously put it: "An editor's business is to present the text as near to the author's intention as he has the means of judging; but this is not identical . . . with a mere reproduction of a copy which the author never saw ... or of the first edition, however much care was bestowed upon it by the original editor and by a scholarly printer."1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
