{"title":"腰椎手术中偶发硬脑膜撕裂:一项前瞻性研究","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/ijor.04.03.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Incidental dual tear is a complication of spinal surgery characterized by an accidental nick of the spinal dural sheath during operative procedures. The worldwide incidence of dural tear according to previous literature varies widely (1- 17%) and in general depends on the type and complexity of the procedure. The present was carried to evaluate the incidence of dural tear in lumbar spine surgery, and to study clinical outcomes in terms of VAS score ODI score and length of hospital stay. Methods: This was a prospective, observational and case control study conducted on 40 patients who underwent elective Lumbosacral spine surgery. The incidence of dural tear was evaluated and the patients were divided into with dural tear and without dural tear. The clinical outcome such as visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Results: The incidence of Dural tear in our study population was found to be 7.5%. The ODI score was significantly higher in dural tear as compared to without dual tear at various postoperative periods. Further, there was no significant difference in the VAS scores with and without dural tear patients. The length of hospital stay was significantly higher in patients with dural tear as compared to without dural tear (11.63±6.19 vs 3.06±1.02 days; p=0.004). Conclusion: Incidental Dural tears if detected and managed accordingly, adverse clinical and postoperative outcomes can be reduced effectively and also increases the quality of life in patients.","PeriodicalId":192630,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Research","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidental Dural Tear in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/ijor.04.03.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Incidental dual tear is a complication of spinal surgery characterized by an accidental nick of the spinal dural sheath during operative procedures. The worldwide incidence of dural tear according to previous literature varies widely (1- 17%) and in general depends on the type and complexity of the procedure. The present was carried to evaluate the incidence of dural tear in lumbar spine surgery, and to study clinical outcomes in terms of VAS score ODI score and length of hospital stay. Methods: This was a prospective, observational and case control study conducted on 40 patients who underwent elective Lumbosacral spine surgery. The incidence of dural tear was evaluated and the patients were divided into with dural tear and without dural tear. The clinical outcome such as visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Results: The incidence of Dural tear in our study population was found to be 7.5%. The ODI score was significantly higher in dural tear as compared to without dual tear at various postoperative periods. Further, there was no significant difference in the VAS scores with and without dural tear patients. The length of hospital stay was significantly higher in patients with dural tear as compared to without dural tear (11.63±6.19 vs 3.06±1.02 days; p=0.004). Conclusion: Incidental Dural tears if detected and managed accordingly, adverse clinical and postoperative outcomes can be reduced effectively and also increases the quality of life in patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedics Research\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/ijor.04.03.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/ijor.04.03.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:偶发性双撕裂是脊柱手术的并发症,其特征是在手术过程中脊髓硬膜鞘意外划伤。根据以前的文献,世界范围内硬脑膜撕裂的发生率差异很大(1- 17%),通常取决于手术的类型和复杂性。本研究旨在评估腰椎手术中硬脑膜撕裂的发生率,并从VAS评分、ODI评分和住院时间等方面研究临床结果。方法:这是一项前瞻性、观察性和病例对照研究,对40例接受择期腰骶椎手术的患者进行了研究。评估硬脑膜撕裂发生率,并将患者分为有硬脑膜撕裂和无硬脑膜撕裂。观察两组患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分及住院时间。结果:在我们的研究人群中,硬脑膜撕裂的发生率为7.5%。在术后不同时期,硬脑膜撕裂组的ODI评分明显高于无双撕裂组。此外,有无硬脑膜撕裂患者的VAS评分无显著差异。硬脑膜撕裂患者的住院时间明显高于无硬脑膜撕裂患者(11.63±6.19 vs 3.06±1.02);p = 0.004)。结论:偶发硬脑膜撕裂若能及时发现并妥善处理,可有效减少临床及术后不良结局,提高患者的生活质量。
Incidental Dural Tear in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Study
Introduction: Incidental dual tear is a complication of spinal surgery characterized by an accidental nick of the spinal dural sheath during operative procedures. The worldwide incidence of dural tear according to previous literature varies widely (1- 17%) and in general depends on the type and complexity of the procedure. The present was carried to evaluate the incidence of dural tear in lumbar spine surgery, and to study clinical outcomes in terms of VAS score ODI score and length of hospital stay. Methods: This was a prospective, observational and case control study conducted on 40 patients who underwent elective Lumbosacral spine surgery. The incidence of dural tear was evaluated and the patients were divided into with dural tear and without dural tear. The clinical outcome such as visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Results: The incidence of Dural tear in our study population was found to be 7.5%. The ODI score was significantly higher in dural tear as compared to without dual tear at various postoperative periods. Further, there was no significant difference in the VAS scores with and without dural tear patients. The length of hospital stay was significantly higher in patients with dural tear as compared to without dural tear (11.63±6.19 vs 3.06±1.02 days; p=0.004). Conclusion: Incidental Dural tears if detected and managed accordingly, adverse clinical and postoperative outcomes can be reduced effectively and also increases the quality of life in patients.