时隙光包前向纠错

Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit Pub Date : 2002-03-17 DOI:10.1109/OFC.2002.1036364

D. Penninckx, E. Caro, O. Audouin, M. Khan, O. Ait-Sab

{"title":"时隙光包前向纠错","authors":"D. Penninckx, E. Caro, O. Audouin, M. Khan, O. Ait-Sab","doi":"10.1109/OFC.2002.1036364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have shown that Reed-Solomon forward error correcting codes are best suited for optical packet as they are for optical circuit. However, due to their small size, a careful choice of the RS parameters has to be made. For instance, with our assumptions, standard RS(255, 239) code is not compliant with packets as short as 12,000 bits at 10 Gbit/s. RS(127,111) should be preferred.","PeriodicalId":347952,"journal":{"name":"Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forward-error correction for time-slotted optical packets\",\"authors\":\"D. Penninckx, E. Caro, O. Audouin, M. Khan, O. Ait-Sab\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OFC.2002.1036364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have shown that Reed-Solomon forward error correcting codes are best suited for optical packet as they are for optical circuit. However, due to their small size, a careful choice of the RS parameters has to be made. For instance, with our assumptions, standard RS(255, 239) code is not compliant with packets as short as 12,000 bits at 10 Gbit/s. RS(127,111) should be preferred.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OFC.2002.1036364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OFC.2002.1036364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

我们已经证明，里德-所罗门前向纠错码最适合于光分组，因为它们是光学电路。然而，由于其体积小，必须仔细选择RS参数。例如，根据我们的假设，标准RS(255,239)代码不符合短至10gbit /s的12,000位数据包。应该优先考虑RS(127,111)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Forward-error correction for time-slotted optical packets

We have shown that Reed-Solomon forward error correcting codes are best suited for optical packet as they are for optical circuit. However, due to their small size, a careful choice of the RS parameters has to be made. For instance, with our assumptions, standard RS(255, 239) code is not compliant with packets as short as 12,000 bits at 10 Gbit/s. RS(127,111) should be preferred.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit

自引率

0.00%

发文量