{"title":"了解气候、遗传变异和草食对黄石国家公园白杨生长的影响","authors":"Elaine M. Brice, D. MacNulty","doi":"10.13001/uwnpsrc.2018.5647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predation is commonly cited as a top-down effect that structures food webs, with the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone as perhaps the most famous example. However, despite two decades of research, there is still debate as to whether wolves (Canis lupus) have indirectly benefited aspen (Populus tremuloides) by reducing herbivory from elk (Cervus canadensis). As such, the purpose of this study was to investigate the role of top-down and bottom-up forces on aspen recruitment in northern Yellowstone. The UW-NPS grant funds were used to conduct a genetic analysis of 59 aspen stands in an effort to determine whether genetic variation is one control of aspen recruitment. During summer 2018, 122 leaves were collected and sent to the Mock Lab at Utah State University. The samples will undergo DNA extractions at 12 microsatellite loci, which will provide us with genotype and ploidy level, with the genotype at a resolution to distinguish clones. Concurrently, we measured aspen heights and browse rates, as well as soil moisture. The median aspen height in 2018 was 110 cm (SD=135), and the browse rate was 0.45. Stands varied in volumetric water content (VWC), ranging from a mean VWC of 2.7% to 45.2%. \n \nFeatured photo by Yellowstone National Park on Flickr. https://flic.kr/p/efXLV2","PeriodicalId":217302,"journal":{"name":"The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the influence of climate, genetic variation, and herbivory on aspen (Populus tremuloides) growth in Yellowstone National Park\",\"authors\":\"Elaine M. Brice, D. MacNulty\",\"doi\":\"10.13001/uwnpsrc.2018.5647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Predation is commonly cited as a top-down effect that structures food webs, with the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone as perhaps the most famous example. However, despite two decades of research, there is still debate as to whether wolves (Canis lupus) have indirectly benefited aspen (Populus tremuloides) by reducing herbivory from elk (Cervus canadensis). As such, the purpose of this study was to investigate the role of top-down and bottom-up forces on aspen recruitment in northern Yellowstone. The UW-NPS grant funds were used to conduct a genetic analysis of 59 aspen stands in an effort to determine whether genetic variation is one control of aspen recruitment. During summer 2018, 122 leaves were collected and sent to the Mock Lab at Utah State University. The samples will undergo DNA extractions at 12 microsatellite loci, which will provide us with genotype and ploidy level, with the genotype at a resolution to distinguish clones. Concurrently, we measured aspen heights and browse rates, as well as soil moisture. The median aspen height in 2018 was 110 cm (SD=135), and the browse rate was 0.45. Stands varied in volumetric water content (VWC), ranging from a mean VWC of 2.7% to 45.2%. \\n \\nFeatured photo by Yellowstone National Park on Flickr. https://flic.kr/p/efXLV2\",\"PeriodicalId\":217302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13001/uwnpsrc.2018.5647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13001/uwnpsrc.2018.5647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
捕食通常被认为是自上而下的效应,它构建了食物网,将狼重新引入黄石公园可能是最著名的例子。然而,尽管经过了二十年的研究,关于狼(Canis lupus)是否通过减少麋鹿(Cervus canadensis)的食草性而间接地使白杨(Populus tremuloides)受益,仍然存在争议。因此,本研究的目的是调查自上而下和自下而上的力量在黄石公园北部白杨招募中的作用。UW-NPS拨款基金用于对59个白杨林进行遗传分析,以确定遗传变异是否是白杨招募的一个控制因素。在2018年夏天,收集了122片叶子并送到犹他州立大学的模拟实验室。样品将在12个微卫星位点进行DNA提取,这将为我们提供基因型和倍性水平,基因型在分辨率上区分克隆。同时,我们测量了白杨的高度和浏览率,以及土壤湿度。2018年白杨平均高度为110 cm (SD=135),浏览率为0.45。林分的体积含水量(VWC)各不相同,平均VWC从2.7%到45.2%不等。黄石国家公园Flickr上的特色照片。https://flic.kr/p/efXLV2
Understanding the influence of climate, genetic variation, and herbivory on aspen (Populus tremuloides) growth in Yellowstone National Park
Predation is commonly cited as a top-down effect that structures food webs, with the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone as perhaps the most famous example. However, despite two decades of research, there is still debate as to whether wolves (Canis lupus) have indirectly benefited aspen (Populus tremuloides) by reducing herbivory from elk (Cervus canadensis). As such, the purpose of this study was to investigate the role of top-down and bottom-up forces on aspen recruitment in northern Yellowstone. The UW-NPS grant funds were used to conduct a genetic analysis of 59 aspen stands in an effort to determine whether genetic variation is one control of aspen recruitment. During summer 2018, 122 leaves were collected and sent to the Mock Lab at Utah State University. The samples will undergo DNA extractions at 12 microsatellite loci, which will provide us with genotype and ploidy level, with the genotype at a resolution to distinguish clones. Concurrently, we measured aspen heights and browse rates, as well as soil moisture. The median aspen height in 2018 was 110 cm (SD=135), and the browse rate was 0.45. Stands varied in volumetric water content (VWC), ranging from a mean VWC of 2.7% to 45.2%.
Featured photo by Yellowstone National Park on Flickr. https://flic.kr/p/efXLV2