自适应粒子群优化算法的比较

E. V. Zyl, A. Engelbrecht
{"title":"自适应粒子群优化算法的比较","authors":"E. V. Zyl, A. Engelbrecht","doi":"10.1109/SIS.2014.7011775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms have a number of parameters to which their behaviour is sensitive. In order to avoid problem-specific parameter tuning, a number of self-adaptive PSO algorithms have been proposed over the past few years. This paper compares the behaviour and performance of a selection of self-adaptive PSO algorithms to that of time-variant algorithms on a suite of 22 boundary constrained benchmark functions of varying complexities. It was found that only two of the nine selected self-adaptive PSO algorithms performed comparably to similar time-variant PSO algorithms. Possible reasons for the poor behaviour of the other algorithms as well as an analysis of the more successful algorithms is performed in this paper.","PeriodicalId":380286,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Swarm Intelligence","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of self-adaptive particle swarm optimizers\",\"authors\":\"E. V. Zyl, A. Engelbrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIS.2014.7011775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms have a number of parameters to which their behaviour is sensitive. In order to avoid problem-specific parameter tuning, a number of self-adaptive PSO algorithms have been proposed over the past few years. This paper compares the behaviour and performance of a selection of self-adaptive PSO algorithms to that of time-variant algorithms on a suite of 22 boundary constrained benchmark functions of varying complexities. It was found that only two of the nine selected self-adaptive PSO algorithms performed comparably to similar time-variant PSO algorithms. Possible reasons for the poor behaviour of the other algorithms as well as an analysis of the more successful algorithms is performed in this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Symposium on Swarm Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Symposium on Swarm Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIS.2014.7011775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Swarm Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIS.2014.7011775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

粒子群优化(PSO)算法具有许多对其行为敏感的参数。为了避免特定问题的参数调优,近年来提出了许多自适应粒子群算法。本文比较了一组自适应粒子群算法与时变算法在22个不同复杂度的边界约束基准函数上的行为和性能。研究发现,9种自适应粒子群算法中只有2种算法的性能与类似的时变粒子群算法相当。本文对其他算法性能差的可能原因进行了分析,并对较为成功的算法进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of self-adaptive particle swarm optimizers
Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms have a number of parameters to which their behaviour is sensitive. In order to avoid problem-specific parameter tuning, a number of self-adaptive PSO algorithms have been proposed over the past few years. This paper compares the behaviour and performance of a selection of self-adaptive PSO algorithms to that of time-variant algorithms on a suite of 22 boundary constrained benchmark functions of varying complexities. It was found that only two of the nine selected self-adaptive PSO algorithms performed comparably to similar time-variant PSO algorithms. Possible reasons for the poor behaviour of the other algorithms as well as an analysis of the more successful algorithms is performed in this paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信