{"title":"自适应粒子群优化算法的比较","authors":"E. V. Zyl, A. Engelbrecht","doi":"10.1109/SIS.2014.7011775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms have a number of parameters to which their behaviour is sensitive. In order to avoid problem-specific parameter tuning, a number of self-adaptive PSO algorithms have been proposed over the past few years. This paper compares the behaviour and performance of a selection of self-adaptive PSO algorithms to that of time-variant algorithms on a suite of 22 boundary constrained benchmark functions of varying complexities. It was found that only two of the nine selected self-adaptive PSO algorithms performed comparably to similar time-variant PSO algorithms. Possible reasons for the poor behaviour of the other algorithms as well as an analysis of the more successful algorithms is performed in this paper.","PeriodicalId":380286,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Swarm Intelligence","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of self-adaptive particle swarm optimizers\",\"authors\":\"E. V. Zyl, A. Engelbrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIS.2014.7011775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms have a number of parameters to which their behaviour is sensitive. In order to avoid problem-specific parameter tuning, a number of self-adaptive PSO algorithms have been proposed over the past few years. This paper compares the behaviour and performance of a selection of self-adaptive PSO algorithms to that of time-variant algorithms on a suite of 22 boundary constrained benchmark functions of varying complexities. It was found that only two of the nine selected self-adaptive PSO algorithms performed comparably to similar time-variant PSO algorithms. Possible reasons for the poor behaviour of the other algorithms as well as an analysis of the more successful algorithms is performed in this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Symposium on Swarm Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Symposium on Swarm Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIS.2014.7011775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Swarm Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIS.2014.7011775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of self-adaptive particle swarm optimizers
Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms have a number of parameters to which their behaviour is sensitive. In order to avoid problem-specific parameter tuning, a number of self-adaptive PSO algorithms have been proposed over the past few years. This paper compares the behaviour and performance of a selection of self-adaptive PSO algorithms to that of time-variant algorithms on a suite of 22 boundary constrained benchmark functions of varying complexities. It was found that only two of the nine selected self-adaptive PSO algorithms performed comparably to similar time-variant PSO algorithms. Possible reasons for the poor behaviour of the other algorithms as well as an analysis of the more successful algorithms is performed in this paper.