REMM方法中的可靠性案例

J.A. Jones, J. Marshall, B. Newman
{"title":"REMM方法中的可靠性案例","authors":"J.A. Jones, J. Marshall, B. Newman","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent thinking within reliability practice has led to a move away from the specification of a set of prescriptive methods that the supplier must undertake to a co-operative approach which requires the exchange of information between the customer and the supplier in order to provide assurance that the product will meet the reliability requirements. This approach is known as the \"reliability case\" and it has some parallels with, but is not the same as, the better known \"safety case\" as used particularly in the aerospace and nuclear industries The reliability case approach is being supported by the UK Ministry of Defence, who originated the idea and have used it as a basis for their reliability standard documents and current practices and also by some civil aerospace companies. It is felt by the companies in the REMM programme that in the longer term the reliability case will become a more often quoted reliability requirement with commonly used MTBF becoming an just element of the requirements. Generally however the aerospace industry has been in something of a quandary about how to react to this sea change in thinking and has been struggling to decide what an appropriate response to a request to a reliability case should be. The holistic approach used by the REMM methodology is ideal suited to provide the basis for a reliability case and this is seen as the ultimate output from the REMM method. To this end the REMM partners have been developing a generic approach to the case. This paper will describe this generic REMM consortium response to a reliability case and how it will be generated by the REMM methodology.","PeriodicalId":270494,"journal":{"name":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","volume":"336 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reliability case in the REMM methodology\",\"authors\":\"J.A. Jones, J. Marshall, B. Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent thinking within reliability practice has led to a move away from the specification of a set of prescriptive methods that the supplier must undertake to a co-operative approach which requires the exchange of information between the customer and the supplier in order to provide assurance that the product will meet the reliability requirements. This approach is known as the \\\"reliability case\\\" and it has some parallels with, but is not the same as, the better known \\\"safety case\\\" as used particularly in the aerospace and nuclear industries The reliability case approach is being supported by the UK Ministry of Defence, who originated the idea and have used it as a basis for their reliability standard documents and current practices and also by some civil aerospace companies. It is felt by the companies in the REMM programme that in the longer term the reliability case will become a more often quoted reliability requirement with commonly used MTBF becoming an just element of the requirements. Generally however the aerospace industry has been in something of a quandary about how to react to this sea change in thinking and has been struggling to decide what an appropriate response to a request to a reliability case should be. The holistic approach used by the REMM methodology is ideal suited to provide the basis for a reliability case and this is seen as the ultimate output from the REMM method. To this end the REMM partners have been developing a generic approach to the case. This paper will describe this generic REMM consortium response to a reliability case and how it will be generated by the REMM methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS\",\"volume\":\"336 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在可靠性实践中,最近的想法导致了一种从供应商必须承担的一套规定方法的规范转向合作方法的转变,这种方法要求客户和供应商之间交换信息,以保证产品满足可靠性要求。这种方法被称为“可靠性案例”,它有一些相似之处,但不一样的是,更著名的“安全案例”,特别是在航空航天和核工业中使用的可靠性案例方法得到了英国国防部的支持,他们提出了这个想法,并将其作为可靠性标准文件和当前实践的基础,也被一些民用航空航天公司使用。参与REMM项目的公司认为,从长远来看,可靠性案例将成为更经常引用的可靠性需求,而常用的MTBF将成为需求的一个要素。然而,总的来说,航空航天业一直处于一种进退两难的境地,如何应对这种思维上的巨大变化,并且一直在努力决定对可靠性案例请求的适当回应应该是什么。REMM方法使用的整体方法非常适合为可靠性案例提供基础,这被视为REMM方法的最终输出。为此,REMM合作伙伴一直在开发一种通用的方法来处理这种情况。本文将描述这种通用的REMM联盟对可靠性案例的响应,以及如何通过REMM方法生成它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The reliability case in the REMM methodology
Recent thinking within reliability practice has led to a move away from the specification of a set of prescriptive methods that the supplier must undertake to a co-operative approach which requires the exchange of information between the customer and the supplier in order to provide assurance that the product will meet the reliability requirements. This approach is known as the "reliability case" and it has some parallels with, but is not the same as, the better known "safety case" as used particularly in the aerospace and nuclear industries The reliability case approach is being supported by the UK Ministry of Defence, who originated the idea and have used it as a basis for their reliability standard documents and current practices and also by some civil aerospace companies. It is felt by the companies in the REMM programme that in the longer term the reliability case will become a more often quoted reliability requirement with commonly used MTBF becoming an just element of the requirements. Generally however the aerospace industry has been in something of a quandary about how to react to this sea change in thinking and has been struggling to decide what an appropriate response to a request to a reliability case should be. The holistic approach used by the REMM methodology is ideal suited to provide the basis for a reliability case and this is seen as the ultimate output from the REMM method. To this end the REMM partners have been developing a generic approach to the case. This paper will describe this generic REMM consortium response to a reliability case and how it will be generated by the REMM methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信