两种多目标进化算法在生产线结构优化中的比较分析

T. Colanzi, S. Vergilio
{"title":"两种多目标进化算法在生产线结构优化中的比较分析","authors":"T. Colanzi, S. Vergilio","doi":"10.1109/ICTAI.2014.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Product Line Architecture (PLA) design is a multi-objective optimization problem that can be properly solved with search-based algorithms. However, search-based PLA design is an incipient research field. Due to this, works in this field have addressed main points to solve the problem: adequate representation, specific search operators and suitable evaluation fitness functions. Similarly what happens in the search-based design of traditional software, existing works on search-based PLA design use NSGA-II, without evaluating the characteristics of this algorithm, such as the use of crossover operator. Considering this fact, this paper reports results from a comparative analysis of two algorithms, NSGA-II and PAES, to the PLA design problem. PAES was chosen because it implements a different evolution strategy that does not employ crossover. An experimental study was carried out with nine PLAs and results of the conducted study attest that NSGA-II performs better than PAES in the PLA design context.","PeriodicalId":142794,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Two Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms in Product Line Architecture Design Optimization\",\"authors\":\"T. Colanzi, S. Vergilio\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTAI.2014.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Product Line Architecture (PLA) design is a multi-objective optimization problem that can be properly solved with search-based algorithms. However, search-based PLA design is an incipient research field. Due to this, works in this field have addressed main points to solve the problem: adequate representation, specific search operators and suitable evaluation fitness functions. Similarly what happens in the search-based design of traditional software, existing works on search-based PLA design use NSGA-II, without evaluating the characteristics of this algorithm, such as the use of crossover operator. Considering this fact, this paper reports results from a comparative analysis of two algorithms, NSGA-II and PAES, to the PLA design problem. PAES was chosen because it implements a different evolution strategy that does not employ crossover. An experimental study was carried out with nine PLAs and results of the conducted study attest that NSGA-II performs better than PAES in the PLA design context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2014.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2014.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

产品线架构设计是一个多目标优化问题,可以用基于搜索的算法来解决。然而,基于搜索的PLA设计是一个刚刚起步的研究领域。因此,该领域的工作主要针对解决问题的要点:充分的表示,特定的搜索算子和合适的评估适应度函数。与传统的基于搜索的软件设计类似,现有的基于搜索的PLA设计工作使用NSGA-II,而没有评估该算法的特点,例如交叉算子的使用。考虑到这一事实,本文报告了NSGA-II和PAES两种算法对PLA设计问题的比较分析结果。之所以选择PAES,是因为它实现了一种不采用交叉的不同进化策略。对9种PLA进行了实验研究,结果表明NSGA-II在PLA设计环境下的性能优于PAES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of Two Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms in Product Line Architecture Design Optimization
The Product Line Architecture (PLA) design is a multi-objective optimization problem that can be properly solved with search-based algorithms. However, search-based PLA design is an incipient research field. Due to this, works in this field have addressed main points to solve the problem: adequate representation, specific search operators and suitable evaluation fitness functions. Similarly what happens in the search-based design of traditional software, existing works on search-based PLA design use NSGA-II, without evaluating the characteristics of this algorithm, such as the use of crossover operator. Considering this fact, this paper reports results from a comparative analysis of two algorithms, NSGA-II and PAES, to the PLA design problem. PAES was chosen because it implements a different evolution strategy that does not employ crossover. An experimental study was carried out with nine PLAs and results of the conducted study attest that NSGA-II performs better than PAES in the PLA design context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信