{"title":"两种多目标进化算法在生产线结构优化中的比较分析","authors":"T. Colanzi, S. Vergilio","doi":"10.1109/ICTAI.2014.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Product Line Architecture (PLA) design is a multi-objective optimization problem that can be properly solved with search-based algorithms. However, search-based PLA design is an incipient research field. Due to this, works in this field have addressed main points to solve the problem: adequate representation, specific search operators and suitable evaluation fitness functions. Similarly what happens in the search-based design of traditional software, existing works on search-based PLA design use NSGA-II, without evaluating the characteristics of this algorithm, such as the use of crossover operator. Considering this fact, this paper reports results from a comparative analysis of two algorithms, NSGA-II and PAES, to the PLA design problem. PAES was chosen because it implements a different evolution strategy that does not employ crossover. An experimental study was carried out with nine PLAs and results of the conducted study attest that NSGA-II performs better than PAES in the PLA design context.","PeriodicalId":142794,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Two Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms in Product Line Architecture Design Optimization\",\"authors\":\"T. Colanzi, S. Vergilio\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTAI.2014.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Product Line Architecture (PLA) design is a multi-objective optimization problem that can be properly solved with search-based algorithms. However, search-based PLA design is an incipient research field. Due to this, works in this field have addressed main points to solve the problem: adequate representation, specific search operators and suitable evaluation fitness functions. Similarly what happens in the search-based design of traditional software, existing works on search-based PLA design use NSGA-II, without evaluating the characteristics of this algorithm, such as the use of crossover operator. Considering this fact, this paper reports results from a comparative analysis of two algorithms, NSGA-II and PAES, to the PLA design problem. PAES was chosen because it implements a different evolution strategy that does not employ crossover. An experimental study was carried out with nine PLAs and results of the conducted study attest that NSGA-II performs better than PAES in the PLA design context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2014.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2014.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Analysis of Two Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms in Product Line Architecture Design Optimization
The Product Line Architecture (PLA) design is a multi-objective optimization problem that can be properly solved with search-based algorithms. However, search-based PLA design is an incipient research field. Due to this, works in this field have addressed main points to solve the problem: adequate representation, specific search operators and suitable evaluation fitness functions. Similarly what happens in the search-based design of traditional software, existing works on search-based PLA design use NSGA-II, without evaluating the characteristics of this algorithm, such as the use of crossover operator. Considering this fact, this paper reports results from a comparative analysis of two algorithms, NSGA-II and PAES, to the PLA design problem. PAES was chosen because it implements a different evolution strategy that does not employ crossover. An experimental study was carried out with nine PLAs and results of the conducted study attest that NSGA-II performs better than PAES in the PLA design context.