面向教师的编排仪表板中的标记:影响其在金字塔式CSCL汇报中使用的因素

Max Dieckmann, Davinia Hernández Leo, Ishari Amarasinghe
{"title":"面向教师的编排仪表板中的标记:影响其在金字塔式CSCL汇报中使用的因素","authors":"Max Dieckmann, Davinia Hernández Leo, Ishari Amarasinghe","doi":"10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teacher-led debriefing has the potential to positively affect learning gains when conducted at the end of collaborative learning activities. In order for debriefing to be effective, the teacher needs to base it on the learner’s process during the activity. Research in the field of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) is proposing teaching-facing dashboards as tools that facilitate the monitoring and orchestration of activities. However, research has paid less attention to how these dashboards can support debriefing. We explore how adding a “flagging” feature to a CSCL orchestration dashboard can support debriefing by reporting a qualitative preliminary study in which the flagging feature was used during a Pyramid CSCL script activity. Results indicate that the dashboard interface design, number of student responses, number of errors in student responses, and whether student responses meet the teachers expectations most influence the use and utility of the feature. Additionally, we identified avenues for improving and extending the design of the feature.","PeriodicalId":221464,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flagging in teacher-facing orchestration dashboards: factors affecting its use in Pyramid CSCL debriefing\",\"authors\":\"Max Dieckmann, Davinia Hernández Leo, Ishari Amarasinghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teacher-led debriefing has the potential to positively affect learning gains when conducted at the end of collaborative learning activities. In order for debriefing to be effective, the teacher needs to base it on the learner’s process during the activity. Research in the field of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) is proposing teaching-facing dashboards as tools that facilitate the monitoring and orchestration of activities. However, research has paid less attention to how these dashboards can support debriefing. We explore how adding a “flagging” feature to a CSCL orchestration dashboard can support debriefing by reporting a qualitative preliminary study in which the flagging feature was used during a Pyramid CSCL script activity. Results indicate that the dashboard interface design, number of student responses, number of errors in student responses, and whether student responses meet the teachers expectations most influence the use and utility of the feature. Additionally, we identified avenues for improving and extending the design of the feature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在合作学习活动结束时进行教师主导的汇报,有可能对学习成果产生积极影响。为了使汇报有效,教师需要根据学习者在活动中的过程来进行汇报。计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)领域的研究建议将面向教学的仪表板作为促进活动监控和编排的工具。然而,研究很少关注这些仪表板如何支持汇报。我们将探讨如何在CSCL编排仪表板中添加“标记”功能,通过报告一个定性的初步研究来支持汇报,其中标记功能是在金字塔CSCL脚本活动中使用的。结果表明,仪表板界面设计、学生回答的数量、学生回答的错误数量以及学生回答是否符合教师的期望对功能的使用和效用影响最大。此外,我们还确定了改进和扩展该功能设计的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flagging in teacher-facing orchestration dashboards: factors affecting its use in Pyramid CSCL debriefing
Teacher-led debriefing has the potential to positively affect learning gains when conducted at the end of collaborative learning activities. In order for debriefing to be effective, the teacher needs to base it on the learner’s process during the activity. Research in the field of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) is proposing teaching-facing dashboards as tools that facilitate the monitoring and orchestration of activities. However, research has paid less attention to how these dashboards can support debriefing. We explore how adding a “flagging” feature to a CSCL orchestration dashboard can support debriefing by reporting a qualitative preliminary study in which the flagging feature was used during a Pyramid CSCL script activity. Results indicate that the dashboard interface design, number of student responses, number of errors in student responses, and whether student responses meet the teachers expectations most influence the use and utility of the feature. Additionally, we identified avenues for improving and extending the design of the feature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信