学生在历史博物馆用碑学习的接受程度

A. Wecker, Merav Yosfan, Billie Eilam, J. Lanir
{"title":"学生在历史博物馆用碑学习的接受程度","authors":"A. Wecker, Merav Yosfan, Billie Eilam, J. Lanir","doi":"10.33965/ml2020_202004c015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines early results of an experiment in students’ user experience for in context learning in a museum with a mobile device. We examine 3 conditions. The first is a paper worksheet (approximately 50 pages) vs two types of mobile application (approximately 25 screens). The second set (both mobile applications) compares a constructivist to an informative educational approach. The students preferred the mobile app over the printed worksheet. Students also found the informative approach preferable to the constructivist approach. In the future we will examine which approach had better learning results and delve deeper into examination of the learning process.","PeriodicalId":207780,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2020","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STUDENT ACCEPTANCE OF LEARNING WITH TABLETS IN A HISTORY MUSEUM\",\"authors\":\"A. Wecker, Merav Yosfan, Billie Eilam, J. Lanir\",\"doi\":\"10.33965/ml2020_202004c015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines early results of an experiment in students’ user experience for in context learning in a museum with a mobile device. We examine 3 conditions. The first is a paper worksheet (approximately 50 pages) vs two types of mobile application (approximately 25 screens). The second set (both mobile applications) compares a constructivist to an informative educational approach. The students preferred the mobile app over the printed worksheet. Students also found the informative approach preferable to the constructivist approach. In the future we will examine which approach had better learning results and delve deeper into examination of the learning process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2020\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33965/ml2020_202004c015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/ml2020_202004c015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了在博物馆中使用移动设备进行情境学习的学生用户体验实验的早期结果。我们考察了3个条件。第一种是纸质工作表(大约50页)和两种类型的移动应用程序(大约25个屏幕)。第二组(两个移动应用程序)比较了建构主义和信息教育方法。学生们更喜欢手机应用程序,而不是打印的工作表。学生们还发现信息性教学方法比建构主义教学方法更可取。在未来,我们将研究哪种方法有更好的学习效果,并深入研究学习过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STUDENT ACCEPTANCE OF LEARNING WITH TABLETS IN A HISTORY MUSEUM
This paper examines early results of an experiment in students’ user experience for in context learning in a museum with a mobile device. We examine 3 conditions. The first is a paper worksheet (approximately 50 pages) vs two types of mobile application (approximately 25 screens). The second set (both mobile applications) compares a constructivist to an informative educational approach. The students preferred the mobile app over the printed worksheet. Students also found the informative approach preferable to the constructivist approach. In the future we will examine which approach had better learning results and delve deeper into examination of the learning process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信