导师满意度:临床教育新模式

L. Myler, Carrie Buch, B. Hagerty, Marisa Ferrari, S. Murphy
{"title":"导师满意度:临床教育新模式","authors":"L. Myler, Carrie Buch, B. Hagerty, Marisa Ferrari, S. Murphy","doi":"10.5480/13-1091.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM The aim of this descriptive study was to examine mentor satisfaction in an academic‐practice partnership in Michigan. BACKGROUND New models of education, in which nurse faculty partner with practicing nurses to mentor and teach students, are being established to meet the demand for nurses. METHOD A survey was distributed via email list to examine mentor satisfaction according to the mentor's education level, experience, and clinical unit. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. RESULTS Findings were analyzed with regard to satisfaction, understanding, student preparedness, comfort of giving feedback, faculty engagement, and the use of evidence‐based practice. Mentors were found to be satisfied with the model. CONCLUSION Nurses with less experience were more satisfied with the model; level of education and unit were not found to be statistically significant. Future research to evaluate academic‐practice partnerships is needed.","PeriodicalId":153271,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspective","volume":"210 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mentor Satisfaction Using a New Model of Clinical Education\",\"authors\":\"L. Myler, Carrie Buch, B. Hagerty, Marisa Ferrari, S. Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.5480/13-1091.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM The aim of this descriptive study was to examine mentor satisfaction in an academic‐practice partnership in Michigan. BACKGROUND New models of education, in which nurse faculty partner with practicing nurses to mentor and teach students, are being established to meet the demand for nurses. METHOD A survey was distributed via email list to examine mentor satisfaction according to the mentor's education level, experience, and clinical unit. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. RESULTS Findings were analyzed with regard to satisfaction, understanding, student preparedness, comfort of giving feedback, faculty engagement, and the use of evidence‐based practice. Mentors were found to be satisfied with the model. CONCLUSION Nurses with less experience were more satisfied with the model; level of education and unit were not found to be statistically significant. Future research to evaluate academic‐practice partnerships is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Education Perspective\",\"volume\":\"210 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Education Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5480/13-1091.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5480/13-1091.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:本描述性研究的目的是考察密歇根州学术实践伙伴关系中导师的满意度。背景:为了满足对护士的需求,正在建立新的教育模式,即护士教师与执业护士合作指导和教育学生。方法采用电子邮件问卷调查的方式,对辅导员的学历、经验、临床单位等进行满意度调查。采用描述性统计方法对结果进行分析。结果:调查结果分析了满意度、理解、学生准备、给予反馈的舒适度、教师参与和基于证据的实践的使用。导师们被发现对这个模型感到满意。结论经验较少的护士对该模式的满意度较高;教育程度和单位在统计学上没有显著性差异。未来的研究需要评估学术与实践的合作关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mentor Satisfaction Using a New Model of Clinical Education
AIM The aim of this descriptive study was to examine mentor satisfaction in an academic‐practice partnership in Michigan. BACKGROUND New models of education, in which nurse faculty partner with practicing nurses to mentor and teach students, are being established to meet the demand for nurses. METHOD A survey was distributed via email list to examine mentor satisfaction according to the mentor's education level, experience, and clinical unit. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. RESULTS Findings were analyzed with regard to satisfaction, understanding, student preparedness, comfort of giving feedback, faculty engagement, and the use of evidence‐based practice. Mentors were found to be satisfied with the model. CONCLUSION Nurses with less experience were more satisfied with the model; level of education and unit were not found to be statistically significant. Future research to evaluate academic‐practice partnerships is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信