{"title":"创业与管理服务理论:从代理视角重新审视彭罗斯","authors":"David Gaddis Ross","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1916137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a parsimonious principal-agent model, this paper builds a theory of how responsibility for entrepreneurial and managerial services should be allocated among managers within a firm. The paper offers an alternative explanation for the Penrose effect, whereby firm growth is said to be retarded by the time required to assimilate new managers. The paper shows a combination of moral hazard and causal ambiguity can similarly retard firm growth.","PeriodicalId":165654,"journal":{"name":"Columbia: Management (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theory of Entrepreneurial and Managerial Services: Revisiting Penrose from an Agency Perspective\",\"authors\":\"David Gaddis Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1916137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a parsimonious principal-agent model, this paper builds a theory of how responsibility for entrepreneurial and managerial services should be allocated among managers within a firm. The paper offers an alternative explanation for the Penrose effect, whereby firm growth is said to be retarded by the time required to assimilate new managers. The paper shows a combination of moral hazard and causal ambiguity can similarly retard firm growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia: Management (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia: Management (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1916137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia: Management (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1916137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Theory of Entrepreneurial and Managerial Services: Revisiting Penrose from an Agency Perspective
Using a parsimonious principal-agent model, this paper builds a theory of how responsibility for entrepreneurial and managerial services should be allocated among managers within a firm. The paper offers an alternative explanation for the Penrose effect, whereby firm growth is said to be retarded by the time required to assimilate new managers. The paper shows a combination of moral hazard and causal ambiguity can similarly retard firm growth.