来和戒烟:一个新的灵活的,密集的戒烟干预计划

M. Rasmussen, M. Kaas, Sine Maria Helldén, N. Kjaer, H. Tønnesen
{"title":"来和戒烟:一个新的灵活的,密集的戒烟干预计划","authors":"M. Rasmussen, M. Kaas, Sine Maria Helldén, N. Kjaer, H. Tønnesen","doi":"10.29102/clinhp.19004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim Smoking cessation is a major challenge for many smokers, and it is necessary to develop and evaluate new programmes. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of ‘Come & Quit’, a flexible, intensive smoking cessation intervention (SCI) with the Danish gold standard programme (GSP). Second, we aimed to identify whether gender was important among disadvantaged and heavy smokers. Methods This was a prospective cohort study based on the Danish National Smoking Cessation Database. From 2011-2016, we included 24,930 smokers from smoking cessation units throughout Denmark; 5,750 received ‘Come & Quit’, and 19,180 received the GSP. Results A total of 16,348 respondents were included in the outcome analyses on continuous abstinence after six months. Thirty-five percent remained successful quitters. Under the Russell criterion, the crude quit rate was 23.0%. The most important predictor was compliance. Overall, men had 3.0-3.1% higher quit rates than women for both programmes. The fully adjusted model confirmed the significantly higher success among men (OR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.07-1.23). Two multivariable logistic regression analyses for men and women showed no statistically significant differences between ‘Come & Quit’ and the GSP for men (OR=1.06, 0.92-1.23) or women (OR=0.94, 0.82-1.08). Across gender, compliance with the programmes was the most important predictor of successful quitting. Minor predictors were calendar year, lack of social disadvantage and heavy smoking. across genders. However, over-all, men had a significantly higher quit rate than","PeriodicalId":311770,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Health Promotion - Research and Best Practice for patients, staff and community","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Come & Quit: A new flexible, Intensive Smoking Cessation Intervention Programme\",\"authors\":\"M. Rasmussen, M. Kaas, Sine Maria Helldén, N. Kjaer, H. Tønnesen\",\"doi\":\"10.29102/clinhp.19004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim Smoking cessation is a major challenge for many smokers, and it is necessary to develop and evaluate new programmes. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of ‘Come & Quit’, a flexible, intensive smoking cessation intervention (SCI) with the Danish gold standard programme (GSP). Second, we aimed to identify whether gender was important among disadvantaged and heavy smokers. Methods This was a prospective cohort study based on the Danish National Smoking Cessation Database. From 2011-2016, we included 24,930 smokers from smoking cessation units throughout Denmark; 5,750 received ‘Come & Quit’, and 19,180 received the GSP. Results A total of 16,348 respondents were included in the outcome analyses on continuous abstinence after six months. Thirty-five percent remained successful quitters. Under the Russell criterion, the crude quit rate was 23.0%. The most important predictor was compliance. Overall, men had 3.0-3.1% higher quit rates than women for both programmes. The fully adjusted model confirmed the significantly higher success among men (OR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.07-1.23). Two multivariable logistic regression analyses for men and women showed no statistically significant differences between ‘Come & Quit’ and the GSP for men (OR=1.06, 0.92-1.23) or women (OR=0.94, 0.82-1.08). Across gender, compliance with the programmes was the most important predictor of successful quitting. Minor predictors were calendar year, lack of social disadvantage and heavy smoking. across genders. However, over-all, men had a significantly higher quit rate than\",\"PeriodicalId\":311770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Health Promotion - Research and Best Practice for patients, staff and community\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Health Promotion - Research and Best Practice for patients, staff and community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29102/clinhp.19004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Health Promotion - Research and Best Practice for patients, staff and community","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29102/clinhp.19004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的戒烟对许多吸烟者来说是一项重大挑战,有必要制定和评估新的规划。目的是比较灵活、强化的戒烟干预(SCI)与丹麦黄金标准计划(GSP)的有效性。其次,我们的目的是确定性别在弱势群体和重度吸烟者中是否重要。方法:这是一项基于丹麦国家戒烟数据库的前瞻性队列研究。2011-2016年,我们纳入了来自丹麦戒烟单位的24,930名吸烟者;5750人获得了“Come & Quit”,19180人获得了GSP。结果共16348人被纳入持续戒断6个月后的结局分析。35%的人仍然成功戒烟。根据罗素标准,粗戒烟率为23.0%。最重要的预测指标是依从性。总的来说,在这两个项目中,男性的戒烟率比女性高3.0-3.1%。完全调整后的模型证实,男性的成功率明显更高(OR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.07-1.23)。对男性和女性进行的两次多变量logistic回归分析显示,“Come & Quit”和GSP在男性(OR=1.06, 0.92-1.23)和女性(OR=0.94, 0.82-1.08)之间没有统计学上的显著差异。无论性别如何,遵守戒烟计划是成功戒烟的最重要预测因素。次要的预测因素是历年、缺乏社会劣势和重度吸烟。跨性别。然而,总体而言,男性的戒烟率明显高于女性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Come & Quit: A new flexible, Intensive Smoking Cessation Intervention Programme
Aim Smoking cessation is a major challenge for many smokers, and it is necessary to develop and evaluate new programmes. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of ‘Come & Quit’, a flexible, intensive smoking cessation intervention (SCI) with the Danish gold standard programme (GSP). Second, we aimed to identify whether gender was important among disadvantaged and heavy smokers. Methods This was a prospective cohort study based on the Danish National Smoking Cessation Database. From 2011-2016, we included 24,930 smokers from smoking cessation units throughout Denmark; 5,750 received ‘Come & Quit’, and 19,180 received the GSP. Results A total of 16,348 respondents were included in the outcome analyses on continuous abstinence after six months. Thirty-five percent remained successful quitters. Under the Russell criterion, the crude quit rate was 23.0%. The most important predictor was compliance. Overall, men had 3.0-3.1% higher quit rates than women for both programmes. The fully adjusted model confirmed the significantly higher success among men (OR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.07-1.23). Two multivariable logistic regression analyses for men and women showed no statistically significant differences between ‘Come & Quit’ and the GSP for men (OR=1.06, 0.92-1.23) or women (OR=0.94, 0.82-1.08). Across gender, compliance with the programmes was the most important predictor of successful quitting. Minor predictors were calendar year, lack of social disadvantage and heavy smoking. across genders. However, over-all, men had a significantly higher quit rate than
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信