{"title":"关于窃听通道的保密指数","authors":"Mani Bastani Parizi, E. Telatar","doi":"10.1109/ITWF.2015.7360781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We derive an exponentially decaying upper-bound on the unnormalized amount of information leaked to the wire-tapper in Wyner's wire-tap channel setting. We characterize the exponent of the bound as a function of the randomness used by the encoder. This exponent matches that of the recent work of Hayashi [12] which is, to the best of our knowledge, the best exponent that exists in the literature. Our proof (like those of [17], [18]) is exclusively based on an i.i.d. random coding construction while that of [12], in addition, requires the use of random universal hash functions.","PeriodicalId":281890,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Information Theory Workshop - Fall (ITW)","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the secrecy exponent of the wire-tap channel\",\"authors\":\"Mani Bastani Parizi, E. Telatar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITWF.2015.7360781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We derive an exponentially decaying upper-bound on the unnormalized amount of information leaked to the wire-tapper in Wyner's wire-tap channel setting. We characterize the exponent of the bound as a function of the randomness used by the encoder. This exponent matches that of the recent work of Hayashi [12] which is, to the best of our knowledge, the best exponent that exists in the literature. Our proof (like those of [17], [18]) is exclusively based on an i.i.d. random coding construction while that of [12], in addition, requires the use of random universal hash functions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Information Theory Workshop - Fall (ITW)\",\"volume\":\"168 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Information Theory Workshop - Fall (ITW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITWF.2015.7360781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Information Theory Workshop - Fall (ITW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITWF.2015.7360781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We derive an exponentially decaying upper-bound on the unnormalized amount of information leaked to the wire-tapper in Wyner's wire-tap channel setting. We characterize the exponent of the bound as a function of the randomness used by the encoder. This exponent matches that of the recent work of Hayashi [12] which is, to the best of our knowledge, the best exponent that exists in the literature. Our proof (like those of [17], [18]) is exclusively based on an i.i.d. random coding construction while that of [12], in addition, requires the use of random universal hash functions.