不确定性的形式化表示

D. Dubois, H. Prade
{"title":"不确定性的形式化表示","authors":"D. Dubois, H. Prade","doi":"10.1002/9780470611876.CH3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent development of uncertainty theories that account for the notion of belief is linked to the emergence, in the XXth century, of Decision Theory and Artificial Intelligence. Nevertheless, this topic was dealt with very differently by each area. Decision Theory insisted on the necessity to found representations on the empirical observation of individuals choosing between courses of action, regardless of any other type of information. Any axiom in the theory should be liable of empirical validation. Probabilistic representations of uncertainty can then be justified with a subjectivist point of view, without necessary reference to frequency. Degrees of probability then evaluate to what extent an agent believes in the occurrence of an event or in the truth of a proposition. In contrast, Artificial Intelligence adopted a more introspective approach aiming at formalizing intuitions, reasoning processes, through the statement of reasonable axioms, often without reference to probability. Actually, until the nineties Artificial Intelligence essentially focused on purely qualitative and ordinal (in fact, logical) representations.","PeriodicalId":112888,"journal":{"name":"Decision-making Process","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"145","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Representations of Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"D. Dubois, H. Prade\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9780470611876.CH3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent development of uncertainty theories that account for the notion of belief is linked to the emergence, in the XXth century, of Decision Theory and Artificial Intelligence. Nevertheless, this topic was dealt with very differently by each area. Decision Theory insisted on the necessity to found representations on the empirical observation of individuals choosing between courses of action, regardless of any other type of information. Any axiom in the theory should be liable of empirical validation. Probabilistic representations of uncertainty can then be justified with a subjectivist point of view, without necessary reference to frequency. Degrees of probability then evaluate to what extent an agent believes in the occurrence of an event or in the truth of a proposition. In contrast, Artificial Intelligence adopted a more introspective approach aiming at formalizing intuitions, reasoning processes, through the statement of reasonable axioms, often without reference to probability. Actually, until the nineties Artificial Intelligence essentially focused on purely qualitative and ordinal (in fact, logical) representations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision-making Process\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"145\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision-making Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470611876.CH3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision-making Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470611876.CH3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 145

摘要

解释信念概念的不确定性理论的最新发展与20世纪决策理论和人工智能的出现有关。然而,每个地区对这个问题的处理方式非常不同。决策理论坚持认为,无论是否有其他类型的信息,都有必要在个人在行动方案之间进行选择的经验观察中找到表征。理论中的任何公理都应该经得起经验的验证。不确定性的概率表示可以用主观主义的观点来证明,而不必参考频率。然后概率度评估一个主体在多大程度上相信一个事件的发生或一个命题的真实性。相比之下,人工智能采用了一种更内省的方法,旨在通过合理公理的陈述来形式化直觉和推理过程,通常不涉及概率。实际上,直到90年代,人工智能本质上还是专注于纯粹的定性和有序(实际上是逻辑)表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formal Representations of Uncertainty
The recent development of uncertainty theories that account for the notion of belief is linked to the emergence, in the XXth century, of Decision Theory and Artificial Intelligence. Nevertheless, this topic was dealt with very differently by each area. Decision Theory insisted on the necessity to found representations on the empirical observation of individuals choosing between courses of action, regardless of any other type of information. Any axiom in the theory should be liable of empirical validation. Probabilistic representations of uncertainty can then be justified with a subjectivist point of view, without necessary reference to frequency. Degrees of probability then evaluate to what extent an agent believes in the occurrence of an event or in the truth of a proposition. In contrast, Artificial Intelligence adopted a more introspective approach aiming at formalizing intuitions, reasoning processes, through the statement of reasonable axioms, often without reference to probability. Actually, until the nineties Artificial Intelligence essentially focused on purely qualitative and ordinal (in fact, logical) representations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信