推荐系统的可复制评估

A. Said, Alejandro Bellogín
{"title":"推荐系统的可复制评估","authors":"A. Said, Alejandro Bellogín","doi":"10.1145/2792838.2792841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recommender systems research is by and large based on comparisons of recommendation algorithms' predictive accuracies: the better the evaluation metrics (higher accuracy scores or lower predictive errors), the better the recommendation algorithm. Comparing the evaluation results of two recommendation approaches is however a difficult process as there are very many factors to be considered in the implementation of an algorithm, its evaluation, and how datasets are processed and prepared. This tutorial shows how to present evaluation results in a clear and concise manner, while ensuring that the results are comparable, replicable and unbiased. These insights are not limited to recommender systems research alone, but are also valid for experiments with other types of personalized interactions and contextual information access.","PeriodicalId":325637,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Replicable Evaluation of Recommender Systems\",\"authors\":\"A. Said, Alejandro Bellogín\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2792838.2792841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recommender systems research is by and large based on comparisons of recommendation algorithms' predictive accuracies: the better the evaluation metrics (higher accuracy scores or lower predictive errors), the better the recommendation algorithm. Comparing the evaluation results of two recommendation approaches is however a difficult process as there are very many factors to be considered in the implementation of an algorithm, its evaluation, and how datasets are processed and prepared. This tutorial shows how to present evaluation results in a clear and concise manner, while ensuring that the results are comparable, replicable and unbiased. These insights are not limited to recommender systems research alone, but are also valid for experiments with other types of personalized interactions and contextual information access.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2792838.2792841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2792838.2792841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

推荐系统的研究基本上是基于推荐算法的预测准确性的比较:评估指标越好(更高的准确性分数或更低的预测误差),推荐算法就越好。然而,比较两种推荐方法的评估结果是一个困难的过程,因为在算法的实现,其评估以及如何处理和准备数据集中需要考虑很多因素。本教程展示了如何以清晰简洁的方式呈现评估结果,同时确保结果具有可比性、可复制性和无偏倚性。这些见解不仅局限于推荐系统的研究,也适用于其他类型的个性化交互和上下文信息访问的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Replicable Evaluation of Recommender Systems
Recommender systems research is by and large based on comparisons of recommendation algorithms' predictive accuracies: the better the evaluation metrics (higher accuracy scores or lower predictive errors), the better the recommendation algorithm. Comparing the evaluation results of two recommendation approaches is however a difficult process as there are very many factors to be considered in the implementation of an algorithm, its evaluation, and how datasets are processed and prepared. This tutorial shows how to present evaluation results in a clear and concise manner, while ensuring that the results are comparable, replicable and unbiased. These insights are not limited to recommender systems research alone, but are also valid for experiments with other types of personalized interactions and contextual information access.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信