根据《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》和1864年《刑事诉讼法》,国家原告和检察官在判决上诉中某些权力的比较分析

{"title":"根据《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》和1864年《刑事诉讼法》,国家原告和检察官在判决上诉中某些权力的比较分析","authors":"","doi":"10.17223/9785946217637/41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is a comparative analysis of some of the powers of the prosecutor and the state accuser in appealing court decisions that have not entered into force the criminal procedure laws of and the 1864 Statute of Criminal Procedure. In the study, methods of analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, some other general scientific methods, as well as personal experience of experts in the law en-forcement system and the court were used. The main conclusion of the study is the need to take into some provisions of the 1864 Statute","PeriodicalId":333070,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Strengthening Russian Statehood: Criminal Procedure, Law Enforcement and Prosecutor’s Supervision","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of some powers of the state accuser and the prosecutor in the appeal of sentences according to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the 1864 Statute of Criminal Procedure\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.17223/9785946217637/41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study is a comparative analysis of some of the powers of the prosecutor and the state accuser in appealing court decisions that have not entered into force the criminal procedure laws of and the 1864 Statute of Criminal Procedure. In the study, methods of analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, some other general scientific methods, as well as personal experience of experts in the law en-forcement system and the court were used. The main conclusion of the study is the need to take into some provisions of the 1864 Statute\",\"PeriodicalId\":333070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Issues of Strengthening Russian Statehood: Criminal Procedure, Law Enforcement and Prosecutor’s Supervision\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Issues of Strengthening Russian Statehood: Criminal Procedure, Law Enforcement and Prosecutor’s Supervision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17223/9785946217637/41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Strengthening Russian Statehood: Criminal Procedure, Law Enforcement and Prosecutor’s Supervision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/9785946217637/41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是对1864年《刑事诉讼法》和《刑事诉讼法》尚未生效的法院判决提出上诉时,检察官和国家原告的一些权力进行比较分析。在研究中,运用了分析、综合、演绎、归纳法等一般科学方法,以及执法系统和法院专家的个人经验。这项研究的主要结论是需要考虑到1864年《规约》的一些规定
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of some powers of the state accuser and the prosecutor in the appeal of sentences according to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the 1864 Statute of Criminal Procedure
The aim of the study is a comparative analysis of some of the powers of the prosecutor and the state accuser in appealing court decisions that have not entered into force the criminal procedure laws of and the 1864 Statute of Criminal Procedure. In the study, methods of analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, some other general scientific methods, as well as personal experience of experts in the law en-forcement system and the court were used. The main conclusion of the study is the need to take into some provisions of the 1864 Statute
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信