扩展理性:从首选到理想,及其对法律的启示

A. Licht
{"title":"扩展理性:从首选到理想,及其对法律的启示","authors":"A. Licht","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1317293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that individual values provide a framework for an economic theory of \"expanded rationality.\" Defined as conceptions of the desirable, values guide the way individuals select actions, evaluate people and events, and explain or justify their actions and evaluations. Values thus may be seen as arguments in individuals' personal utility functions; they underlie the construction of preferences; and they supply reasons for reason-based choice. The theory expands the conception of rationality by incorporating a set of motivational goals that is richer than the standard depiction of self-interest yet avoids the pitfalls of ad hocery and tautological definitions. Such a theory can better illuminate policy debates. It thus entails direct implications for law.","PeriodicalId":191231,"journal":{"name":"Law & Psychology eJournal","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanded Rationality: From the Preferred to the Desirable, with Some Implications for Law\",\"authors\":\"A. Licht\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1317293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that individual values provide a framework for an economic theory of \\\"expanded rationality.\\\" Defined as conceptions of the desirable, values guide the way individuals select actions, evaluate people and events, and explain or justify their actions and evaluations. Values thus may be seen as arguments in individuals' personal utility functions; they underlie the construction of preferences; and they supply reasons for reason-based choice. The theory expands the conception of rationality by incorporating a set of motivational goals that is richer than the standard depiction of self-interest yet avoids the pitfalls of ad hocery and tautological definitions. Such a theory can better illuminate policy debates. It thus entails direct implications for law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Psychology eJournal\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Psychology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1317293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Psychology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1317293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文认为,个体价值为“扩展理性”的经济理论提供了一个框架。价值观被定义为理想的概念,它指导个人选择行为、评价人和事件、解释或证明他们的行为和评价的方式。因此,价值观可以被视为个人效用函数中的参数;它们是偏好构建的基础;它们为基于理性的选择提供了理由。该理论扩展了理性的概念,纳入了一系列动机目标,这些目标比自利的标准描述更丰富,但避免了虚妄和重复定义的陷阱。这样的理论可以更好地阐明政策辩论。因此,它对法律有直接的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expanded Rationality: From the Preferred to the Desirable, with Some Implications for Law
This paper argues that individual values provide a framework for an economic theory of "expanded rationality." Defined as conceptions of the desirable, values guide the way individuals select actions, evaluate people and events, and explain or justify their actions and evaluations. Values thus may be seen as arguments in individuals' personal utility functions; they underlie the construction of preferences; and they supply reasons for reason-based choice. The theory expands the conception of rationality by incorporating a set of motivational goals that is richer than the standard depiction of self-interest yet avoids the pitfalls of ad hocery and tautological definitions. Such a theory can better illuminate policy debates. It thus entails direct implications for law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信