学习策略分析:课程设计与交付方式的作用

W. Matcha, D. Gašević, Nora'ayu Ahmad Uzir, J. Jovanović, A. Pardo, Lisa-Angelique Lim, Jorge Maldonado-Mahauad, Sheridan Gentili, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, Yi-Shan Tsai
{"title":"学习策略分析:课程设计与交付方式的作用","authors":"W. Matcha, D. Gašević, Nora'ayu Ahmad Uzir, J. Jovanović, A. Pardo, Lisa-Angelique Lim, Jorge Maldonado-Mahauad, Sheridan Gentili, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, Yi-Shan Tsai","doi":"10.18608/JLA.2020.72.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generalizability of the value of methods based on learning analytics remains one of the big challenges in the field of learning analytics. One approach to testing generalizability of a method is to apply it consistently in different learning contexts. This study extends a previously published work by examining the generalizability of a learning analytics method proposed for detecting learning tactics and strategies from trace data. The method was applied to the datasets collected in three different course designs and delivery modalities, including flipped classroom, blended learning, and massive open online course. The proposed method combines process mining and sequence analysis. The detected learning strategies are explored in terms of their association with academic performance. The results indicate the applicability of the proposed method across different learning contexts. Moreover, the findings contribute to the understanding of the learning tactics and strategies identified in the trace data: learning tactics proved to be responsive to the course design, whereas learning strategies were found to be more sensitive to the delivery modalities than to the course design. These findings, well aligned with self-regulated learning theory, highlight the association of learning contexts with the choice of learning tactics and strategies.","PeriodicalId":145357,"journal":{"name":"J. Learn. Anal.","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytics of Learning Strategies: Role of Course Design and Delivery Modality\",\"authors\":\"W. Matcha, D. Gašević, Nora'ayu Ahmad Uzir, J. Jovanović, A. Pardo, Lisa-Angelique Lim, Jorge Maldonado-Mahauad, Sheridan Gentili, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, Yi-Shan Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.18608/JLA.2020.72.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Generalizability of the value of methods based on learning analytics remains one of the big challenges in the field of learning analytics. One approach to testing generalizability of a method is to apply it consistently in different learning contexts. This study extends a previously published work by examining the generalizability of a learning analytics method proposed for detecting learning tactics and strategies from trace data. The method was applied to the datasets collected in three different course designs and delivery modalities, including flipped classroom, blended learning, and massive open online course. The proposed method combines process mining and sequence analysis. The detected learning strategies are explored in terms of their association with academic performance. The results indicate the applicability of the proposed method across different learning contexts. Moreover, the findings contribute to the understanding of the learning tactics and strategies identified in the trace data: learning tactics proved to be responsive to the course design, whereas learning strategies were found to be more sensitive to the delivery modalities than to the course design. These findings, well aligned with self-regulated learning theory, highlight the association of learning contexts with the choice of learning tactics and strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Learn. Anal.\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Learn. Anal.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18608/JLA.2020.72.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Learn. Anal.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/JLA.2020.72.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

基于学习分析的方法的价值的可泛化性仍然是学习分析领域的重大挑战之一。测试一种方法的泛化性的一种方法是在不同的学习环境中始终如一地应用它。本研究扩展了先前发表的一项工作,研究了一种用于从跟踪数据中检测学习策略和策略的学习分析方法的泛化性。该方法应用于三种不同课程设计和交付模式收集的数据集,包括翻转课堂、混合学习和大规模开放在线课程。该方法将过程挖掘和序列分析相结合。研究了被检测到的学习策略与学习成绩的关系。结果表明,该方法适用于不同的学习环境。此外,研究结果有助于理解跟踪数据中确定的学习策略和策略:学习策略被证明对课程设计有响应,而学习策略被发现对交付方式比对课程设计更敏感。这些发现与自我调节学习理论一致,强调了学习情境与学习策略和策略的选择之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analytics of Learning Strategies: Role of Course Design and Delivery Modality
Generalizability of the value of methods based on learning analytics remains one of the big challenges in the field of learning analytics. One approach to testing generalizability of a method is to apply it consistently in different learning contexts. This study extends a previously published work by examining the generalizability of a learning analytics method proposed for detecting learning tactics and strategies from trace data. The method was applied to the datasets collected in three different course designs and delivery modalities, including flipped classroom, blended learning, and massive open online course. The proposed method combines process mining and sequence analysis. The detected learning strategies are explored in terms of their association with academic performance. The results indicate the applicability of the proposed method across different learning contexts. Moreover, the findings contribute to the understanding of the learning tactics and strategies identified in the trace data: learning tactics proved to be responsive to the course design, whereas learning strategies were found to be more sensitive to the delivery modalities than to the course design. These findings, well aligned with self-regulated learning theory, highlight the association of learning contexts with the choice of learning tactics and strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信