经纪人和不可核实损失的保险

N. Doherty, Alexander Muermann
{"title":"经纪人和不可核实损失的保险","authors":"N. Doherty, Alexander Muermann","doi":"10.1353/PFS.2004.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do insurance markets spread the risk when events are unknown or even unknowable? We argue that the insurance market is organized to write incomplete contracts such that these risks can be spread, even though complete contracts cannot be written. Both policyholders and insurers hostage their reputations when they engage in trade. The force of these reputation investments leads the parties to negotiate for a settlement when an event that is not covered by the insurance contract occurs. By choice of brokers, the parties can leverage the reputation stakes and thus influence the payoffs for un-contracted events. Thus, we see the role of ex post negotiation as helping to complete markets where otherwise insurance would not have been available. This view contrasts with other recent analyses in which ex post negotiation is seen as a degradation of the insurance market. ∗Doherty and Muermann: Department of Insurance and Risk Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA, email: doherty@wharton.upenn.edu muermann@wharton.upenn.edu. We wish to thank Christian Laux and Soenje Reiche for valuable comments.","PeriodicalId":124672,"journal":{"name":"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brokers and the Insurance of Non-Verifiable Losses\",\"authors\":\"N. Doherty, Alexander Muermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/PFS.2004.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How do insurance markets spread the risk when events are unknown or even unknowable? We argue that the insurance market is organized to write incomplete contracts such that these risks can be spread, even though complete contracts cannot be written. Both policyholders and insurers hostage their reputations when they engage in trade. The force of these reputation investments leads the parties to negotiate for a settlement when an event that is not covered by the insurance contract occurs. By choice of brokers, the parties can leverage the reputation stakes and thus influence the payoffs for un-contracted events. Thus, we see the role of ex post negotiation as helping to complete markets where otherwise insurance would not have been available. This view contrasts with other recent analyses in which ex post negotiation is seen as a degradation of the insurance market. ∗Doherty and Muermann: Department of Insurance and Risk Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA, email: doherty@wharton.upenn.edu muermann@wharton.upenn.edu. We wish to thank Christian Laux and Soenje Reiche for valuable comments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/PFS.2004.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/PFS.2004.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当事件未知甚至不可知时,保险市场如何分散风险?我们认为,保险市场的组织是为了撰写不完整的合同,以便这些风险可以分散,即使无法撰写完整的合同。保单持有人和保险公司在从事贸易时都以自己的声誉为人质。这些声誉投资的力量导致双方在保险合同未涵盖的事件发生时谈判解决。通过选择经纪人,双方可以利用声誉风险,从而影响未签约事件的收益。因此,我们认为事后谈判的作用是帮助完善市场,否则就不会有保险。这一观点与最近的其他分析形成对比,在这些分析中,事后谈判被视为保险市场的退化。* Doherty和Muermann:宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院保险与风险管理系,3620 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA, email: doherty@wharton.upenn.edu muermann@wharton.upenn.edu。我们要感谢克里斯蒂安·劳克斯和索恩杰·赖希提出的宝贵意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brokers and the Insurance of Non-Verifiable Losses
How do insurance markets spread the risk when events are unknown or even unknowable? We argue that the insurance market is organized to write incomplete contracts such that these risks can be spread, even though complete contracts cannot be written. Both policyholders and insurers hostage their reputations when they engage in trade. The force of these reputation investments leads the parties to negotiate for a settlement when an event that is not covered by the insurance contract occurs. By choice of brokers, the parties can leverage the reputation stakes and thus influence the payoffs for un-contracted events. Thus, we see the role of ex post negotiation as helping to complete markets where otherwise insurance would not have been available. This view contrasts with other recent analyses in which ex post negotiation is seen as a degradation of the insurance market. ∗Doherty and Muermann: Department of Insurance and Risk Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA, email: doherty@wharton.upenn.edu muermann@wharton.upenn.edu. We wish to thank Christian Laux and Soenje Reiche for valuable comments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信