[一种检测传染性单核细胞增多症嗜异性抗体的马红细胞凝集试验的新改进]。

M Votava
{"title":"[一种检测传染性单核细胞增多症嗜异性抗体的马红细胞凝集试验的新改进]。","authors":"M Votava","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The new modification (HEA test) is based on the presence of a singularly distinct agglutination of native horse erythrocytes in a serum dilution 1:10 and more from cases with Epstein-Barr virus infectious mononucleosis. In 1665 sera the HEA test was equally often positive as the OCH test (in 5.2%) whereas the IM test with formal-treated horse erythrocytes was positive only in 3.7%. The sensitivity of the IM test in comparison with the OCH test was 61%, the specificity 99.5%. The sensitivity of the HEA test in comparison with the OCH test was 76%, the specificity 98.7%. The specificity of the HEA test in a group of 52 sera without IgG antibodies to EB-viral capsid antigen (EB VCA) was 94%, in another group of 130 sera from hepatitis cases it was 98%. In 103 pairs of sera from infants aged 1-5 years the positivity of the OCH test, HEA test, IgM antibodies to EB VCA and the four-fold rise in the titre of EB-viral IgG were, 20%, 16%, 23% and 24% respectively. Analogous values in 159 pairs of sera from older subjects were 42%, 40%, 38% and 29%. The HEA test is recommended as useful adjunct to the OCH test for the detection of heterophile antibodies even in young children.</p>","PeriodicalId":75687,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","volume":"41 6","pages":"317-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A new modification of the horse erythrocyte agglutination test for the detection of heterophilic antibodies in infectious mononucleosis].\",\"authors\":\"M Votava\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The new modification (HEA test) is based on the presence of a singularly distinct agglutination of native horse erythrocytes in a serum dilution 1:10 and more from cases with Epstein-Barr virus infectious mononucleosis. In 1665 sera the HEA test was equally often positive as the OCH test (in 5.2%) whereas the IM test with formal-treated horse erythrocytes was positive only in 3.7%. The sensitivity of the IM test in comparison with the OCH test was 61%, the specificity 99.5%. The sensitivity of the HEA test in comparison with the OCH test was 76%, the specificity 98.7%. The specificity of the HEA test in a group of 52 sera without IgG antibodies to EB-viral capsid antigen (EB VCA) was 94%, in another group of 130 sera from hepatitis cases it was 98%. In 103 pairs of sera from infants aged 1-5 years the positivity of the OCH test, HEA test, IgM antibodies to EB VCA and the four-fold rise in the titre of EB-viral IgG were, 20%, 16%, 23% and 24% respectively. Analogous values in 159 pairs of sera from older subjects were 42%, 40%, 38% and 29%. The HEA test is recommended as useful adjunct to the OCH test for the detection of heterophile antibodies even in young children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie\",\"volume\":\"41 6\",\"pages\":\"317-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的修改(HEA试验)是基于在Epstein-Barr病毒感染性单核细胞增多症的病例中,在1:10及以上的血清稀释中存在独特的天然马红细胞凝集。在1665份血清中,HEA试验与OCH试验同样呈阳性(5.2%),而用正规处理的马红细胞进行IM试验仅呈阳性3.7%。与OCH试验相比,IM试验的敏感性为61%,特异性为99.5%。与OCH试验相比,HEA试验的敏感性为76%,特异性为98.7%。HEA试验在52份不含EB病毒衣壳抗原(EB VCA) IgG抗体的血清中特异性为94%,在另一组130份肝炎患者血清中特异性为98%。103对1 ~ 5岁婴幼儿血清OCH、HEA、EB- VCA IgM抗体阳性率分别为20%、16%、23%和24%,EB病毒IgG滴度升高4倍。159对老年受试者血清的类似值分别为42%、40%、38%和29%。HEA试验被推荐作为OCH试验的有用辅助,用于检测嗜异性抗体,即使在幼儿中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[A new modification of the horse erythrocyte agglutination test for the detection of heterophilic antibodies in infectious mononucleosis].

The new modification (HEA test) is based on the presence of a singularly distinct agglutination of native horse erythrocytes in a serum dilution 1:10 and more from cases with Epstein-Barr virus infectious mononucleosis. In 1665 sera the HEA test was equally often positive as the OCH test (in 5.2%) whereas the IM test with formal-treated horse erythrocytes was positive only in 3.7%. The sensitivity of the IM test in comparison with the OCH test was 61%, the specificity 99.5%. The sensitivity of the HEA test in comparison with the OCH test was 76%, the specificity 98.7%. The specificity of the HEA test in a group of 52 sera without IgG antibodies to EB-viral capsid antigen (EB VCA) was 94%, in another group of 130 sera from hepatitis cases it was 98%. In 103 pairs of sera from infants aged 1-5 years the positivity of the OCH test, HEA test, IgM antibodies to EB VCA and the four-fold rise in the titre of EB-viral IgG were, 20%, 16%, 23% and 24% respectively. Analogous values in 159 pairs of sera from older subjects were 42%, 40%, 38% and 29%. The HEA test is recommended as useful adjunct to the OCH test for the detection of heterophile antibodies even in young children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信