OpenStack云计算平台的bug修复变更背景分析

Domenico Cotroneo, L. Simone, Antonio Ken Iannillo, R. Natella, Stefano Rosiello, N. Bidokhti
{"title":"OpenStack云计算平台的bug修复变更背景分析","authors":"Domenico Cotroneo, L. Simone, Antonio Ken Iannillo, R. Natella, Stefano Rosiello, N. Bidokhti","doi":"10.1109/ISSRE.2019.00041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many research areas in software engineering, such as mutation testing, automatic repair, fault localization, and fault injection, rely on empirical knowledge about recurring bug-fixing code changes. Previous studies in this field focus on what has been changed due to bug-fixes, such as in terms of code edit actions. However, such studies did not consider where the bug-fix change was made (i.e., the context of the change), but knowing about the context can potentially narrow the search space for many software engineering techniques (e.g., by focusing mutation only on specific parts of the software). Furthermore, most previous work on bug-fixing changes focused on C and Java projects, but there is little empirical evidence about Python software. Therefore, in this paper we perform a thorough empirical analysis of bug-fixing changes in three OpenStack projects, focusing on both the what and the where of the changes. We observed that all the recurring change patterns are not oblivious with respect to the surrounding code, but tend to occur in specific code contexts.","PeriodicalId":254749,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the Context of Bug-Fixing Changes in the OpenStack Cloud Computing Platform\",\"authors\":\"Domenico Cotroneo, L. Simone, Antonio Ken Iannillo, R. Natella, Stefano Rosiello, N. Bidokhti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSRE.2019.00041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many research areas in software engineering, such as mutation testing, automatic repair, fault localization, and fault injection, rely on empirical knowledge about recurring bug-fixing code changes. Previous studies in this field focus on what has been changed due to bug-fixes, such as in terms of code edit actions. However, such studies did not consider where the bug-fix change was made (i.e., the context of the change), but knowing about the context can potentially narrow the search space for many software engineering techniques (e.g., by focusing mutation only on specific parts of the software). Furthermore, most previous work on bug-fixing changes focused on C and Java projects, but there is little empirical evidence about Python software. Therefore, in this paper we perform a thorough empirical analysis of bug-fixing changes in three OpenStack projects, focusing on both the what and the where of the changes. We observed that all the recurring change patterns are not oblivious with respect to the surrounding code, but tend to occur in specific code contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.2019.00041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.2019.00041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

软件工程中的许多研究领域,如突变测试、自动修复、故障定位和故障注入,都依赖于关于反复出现的bug修复代码更改的经验知识。该领域之前的研究关注的是由于bug修复而发生的变化,比如代码编辑操作。然而,这样的研究并没有考虑到错误修复变更是在哪里进行的(例如,变更的上下文),但是了解上下文可能会缩小许多软件工程技术的搜索空间(例如,通过只关注软件的特定部分的突变)。此外,以前大多数关于bug修复更改的工作都集中在C和Java项目上,但是很少有关于Python软件的经验证据。因此,在本文中,我们对三个OpenStack项目中的bug修复更改进行了彻底的实证分析,重点关注更改的内容和位置。我们观察到,所有反复出现的更改模式都与周围的代码无关,而是倾向于出现在特定的代码上下文中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing the Context of Bug-Fixing Changes in the OpenStack Cloud Computing Platform
Many research areas in software engineering, such as mutation testing, automatic repair, fault localization, and fault injection, rely on empirical knowledge about recurring bug-fixing code changes. Previous studies in this field focus on what has been changed due to bug-fixes, such as in terms of code edit actions. However, such studies did not consider where the bug-fix change was made (i.e., the context of the change), but knowing about the context can potentially narrow the search space for many software engineering techniques (e.g., by focusing mutation only on specific parts of the software). Furthermore, most previous work on bug-fixing changes focused on C and Java projects, but there is little empirical evidence about Python software. Therefore, in this paper we perform a thorough empirical analysis of bug-fixing changes in three OpenStack projects, focusing on both the what and the where of the changes. We observed that all the recurring change patterns are not oblivious with respect to the surrounding code, but tend to occur in specific code contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信