罗马尼亚海上石油和天然气活动财政框架

D. Crisan
{"title":"罗马尼亚海上石油和天然气活动财政框架","authors":"D. Crisan","doi":"10.11575/SPPP.V9I0.42571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discovery in 2012 of a significant natural gas reservoir in the Romanian offshore sector of the Black Sea, followed by other encouraging findings, offers an opportunity for the Romanian government to update the fiscal legislation concerning taxation and royalties for oil and gas activities in order to attract more investment in this vital sector. This study analyses the opportunity of replacing the current revenue-based royalties that apply to all types of oil and gas projects with a resource-rent tax (RRT) in the offshore sector. A RRT is the most efficient way for the government to collect a share of the rents or surplus generated by the exploitation of non-renewable resources. However it can be difficult to implement a RRT for small extraction projects that are hard to monitor. We recommend that the new legislation distinguish between conventional onshore and offshore projects, primarily because offshore production entails larger investment expenditures, higher risks, and longer times to build and then to recover costs, than conventional onshore projects. A resource rent tax (RRT) should be adopted for offshore oil and gas projects because it could provide greater incentives to invest in exploration and development than royalties based on revenues from oil and gas production. Under a resource rent tax, a firm can deduct all of its operating and capital expenditures from its current revenues from a project.  If the operating and capital expenditures exceed current revenues, which will generally be the case in first few years of a project, the firm can carry these expenditures forward at a specified interest rate and deduct them from future revenues.  The base for a resource rent tax is the difference between the present value of the revenue stream from a project and the present value of its operating and capital expenditures or, in other words, the present value of the economic rent generated by the project. The average effective tax and royalty rate (AETRR) is the share of the economic rent generated by a project that is captured by the government through taxes and royalties. The marginal effective tax and royalty rate (METRR) measures in percentage terms the wedge that the tax and royalty system drives between the gross-of-tax rate of return earned by a marginal investment and the net-of-tax rate of return.  The METRR is a measure of the disincentives to invest in oil and gas projects that are created by the tax and royalty system. We estimate that replacing the current 13 per cent royalty with a 45 per cent RRT would maintain the current AETRR and reduce the METRR for exploration and development activities in the Romania offshore sector by more than 12 percentage points, from approximately 18 per cent to less than six per cent, resulting in a significant reduction in the distortions created by the tax and royalty system.  This switch would generate approximately the same, or perhaps even more, revenue for the Romanian government, as our analysis of a prototype offshore natural gas project illustrates. If it adopts a RRT for the offshore projects, the Romanian government should consider the adoption of a RRT rate that varies with the price of oil or the price of natural gas. The variable RRT rate means that, as the price of the resource increases and more economic rent is generated, the government is able to capture a larger share of a larger pie. Having an explicit formula for how the RRT rate will vary with the price of the resource also reduces uncertainty about future RRT rates if prices are different in the future. In order to smooth its revenue stream from offshore projects and to improve public acceptance of the adoption of a resource rent tax, the Romanian governments could retain a royalty on revenues from offshore production in the initial years of a project, which would be credited against the project’s future RRT liabilities. This would change the time profile of the government’s revenue stream, relative to a pure RRT, but the present value of the revenue stream would remain the same. Another complimentary fiscal instrument that can be used to achieve a similar goal as the RRT is to award exploration rights through competitive auctions. The more geological information is available to potential investors, the closer their bids will reflect the expected rent from developing the resource, allowing the government to capture without distortions a significant portion of the rents generated by oil and gas extraction projects.","PeriodicalId":151913,"journal":{"name":"ChemRN: Energy Policy (Topic)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Fiscal Framework for Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in Romania\",\"authors\":\"D. Crisan\",\"doi\":\"10.11575/SPPP.V9I0.42571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The discovery in 2012 of a significant natural gas reservoir in the Romanian offshore sector of the Black Sea, followed by other encouraging findings, offers an opportunity for the Romanian government to update the fiscal legislation concerning taxation and royalties for oil and gas activities in order to attract more investment in this vital sector. This study analyses the opportunity of replacing the current revenue-based royalties that apply to all types of oil and gas projects with a resource-rent tax (RRT) in the offshore sector. A RRT is the most efficient way for the government to collect a share of the rents or surplus generated by the exploitation of non-renewable resources. However it can be difficult to implement a RRT for small extraction projects that are hard to monitor. We recommend that the new legislation distinguish between conventional onshore and offshore projects, primarily because offshore production entails larger investment expenditures, higher risks, and longer times to build and then to recover costs, than conventional onshore projects. A resource rent tax (RRT) should be adopted for offshore oil and gas projects because it could provide greater incentives to invest in exploration and development than royalties based on revenues from oil and gas production. Under a resource rent tax, a firm can deduct all of its operating and capital expenditures from its current revenues from a project.  If the operating and capital expenditures exceed current revenues, which will generally be the case in first few years of a project, the firm can carry these expenditures forward at a specified interest rate and deduct them from future revenues.  The base for a resource rent tax is the difference between the present value of the revenue stream from a project and the present value of its operating and capital expenditures or, in other words, the present value of the economic rent generated by the project. The average effective tax and royalty rate (AETRR) is the share of the economic rent generated by a project that is captured by the government through taxes and royalties. The marginal effective tax and royalty rate (METRR) measures in percentage terms the wedge that the tax and royalty system drives between the gross-of-tax rate of return earned by a marginal investment and the net-of-tax rate of return.  The METRR is a measure of the disincentives to invest in oil and gas projects that are created by the tax and royalty system. We estimate that replacing the current 13 per cent royalty with a 45 per cent RRT would maintain the current AETRR and reduce the METRR for exploration and development activities in the Romania offshore sector by more than 12 percentage points, from approximately 18 per cent to less than six per cent, resulting in a significant reduction in the distortions created by the tax and royalty system.  This switch would generate approximately the same, or perhaps even more, revenue for the Romanian government, as our analysis of a prototype offshore natural gas project illustrates. If it adopts a RRT for the offshore projects, the Romanian government should consider the adoption of a RRT rate that varies with the price of oil or the price of natural gas. The variable RRT rate means that, as the price of the resource increases and more economic rent is generated, the government is able to capture a larger share of a larger pie. Having an explicit formula for how the RRT rate will vary with the price of the resource also reduces uncertainty about future RRT rates if prices are different in the future. In order to smooth its revenue stream from offshore projects and to improve public acceptance of the adoption of a resource rent tax, the Romanian governments could retain a royalty on revenues from offshore production in the initial years of a project, which would be credited against the project’s future RRT liabilities. This would change the time profile of the government’s revenue stream, relative to a pure RRT, but the present value of the revenue stream would remain the same. Another complimentary fiscal instrument that can be used to achieve a similar goal as the RRT is to award exploration rights through competitive auctions. The more geological information is available to potential investors, the closer their bids will reflect the expected rent from developing the resource, allowing the government to capture without distortions a significant portion of the rents generated by oil and gas extraction projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ChemRN: Energy Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ChemRN: Energy Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11575/SPPP.V9I0.42571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemRN: Energy Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11575/SPPP.V9I0.42571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2012年,罗马尼亚在黑海海域发现了一个重要的天然气储层,随后又发现了其他令人鼓舞的发现,这为罗马尼亚政府更新有关石油和天然气活动税收和特许权使用费的财政立法提供了机会,以便在这一重要领域吸引更多投资。本研究分析了用资源租赁税(RRT)取代目前适用于所有类型石油和天然气项目的基于收入的特许权使用费的机会。RRT是政府从不可再生资源开采产生的租金或盈余中收取份额的最有效方式。然而,对于难以监控的小型提取项目来说,实现RRT是很困难的。我们建议新的立法区分传统的陆上和海上项目,主要是因为海上生产需要更大的投资支出,更高的风险,建设和回收成本的时间比传统的陆上项目更长。对于海上油气项目,应该征收资源租赁税(RRT),因为与基于油气生产收入的特许权使用费相比,它可以提供更大的激励来投资勘探和开发。在资源租赁税下,公司可以从项目的当期收入中扣除所有的运营和资本支出。如果运营和资本支出超过当前收入,通常在项目的头几年都会出现这种情况,公司可以按规定的利率将这些支出结转,并从未来的收入中扣除。资源地租税的基础是项目收入流的现值与其运营和资本支出的现值之间的差额,换句话说,就是项目产生的经济租金的现值。平均有效税收和特许权使用费税率(AETRR)是指政府通过税收和特许权使用费获得的项目产生的经济租金份额。边际有效税收和特许权使用费税率(METRR)以百分比形式衡量税收和特许权使用费制度在边际投资获得的总税率和净税率回报率之间所驱动的楔子。METRR衡量的是税收和特许权使用费制度对投资石油和天然气项目的抑制作用。我们估计,用45%的RRT取代目前13%的特许权使用费将保持目前的AETRR,并将罗马尼亚海上部门勘探和开发活动的METRR减少12个百分点以上,从大约18%减少到不到6%,从而大大减少了税收和特许权使用费制度造成的扭曲。正如我们对一个海上天然气项目原型的分析所表明的那样,这种转变将为罗马尼亚政府带来大致相同,甚至更多的收入。如果在海上项目中采用RRT,罗马尼亚政府应该考虑采用随石油或天然气价格变化的RRT费率。可变的RRT率意味着,随着资源价格的上涨,产生更多的经济租金,政府能够在更大的蛋糕中分得更大的份额。有一个明确的公式来说明RRT利率如何随资源价格变化,还可以减少未来价格不同时未来RRT利率的不确定性。为了使海上项目的收入流平稳,并提高公众对资源租赁税的接受程度,罗马尼亚政府可以在项目的最初几年保留海上生产收入的特许权使用费,这将记入项目未来的RRT负债。相对于纯粹的RRT,这将改变政府收入流的时间概况,但收入流的现值将保持不变。另一种可用于实现与RRT类似目标的免费财政工具是通过竞争性拍卖授予勘探权。潜在投资者获得的地质信息越多,他们的出价就越接近于反映资源开发的预期租金,从而使政府能够在不扭曲的情况下获得石油和天然气开采项目产生的很大一部分租金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Fiscal Framework for Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in Romania
The discovery in 2012 of a significant natural gas reservoir in the Romanian offshore sector of the Black Sea, followed by other encouraging findings, offers an opportunity for the Romanian government to update the fiscal legislation concerning taxation and royalties for oil and gas activities in order to attract more investment in this vital sector. This study analyses the opportunity of replacing the current revenue-based royalties that apply to all types of oil and gas projects with a resource-rent tax (RRT) in the offshore sector. A RRT is the most efficient way for the government to collect a share of the rents or surplus generated by the exploitation of non-renewable resources. However it can be difficult to implement a RRT for small extraction projects that are hard to monitor. We recommend that the new legislation distinguish between conventional onshore and offshore projects, primarily because offshore production entails larger investment expenditures, higher risks, and longer times to build and then to recover costs, than conventional onshore projects. A resource rent tax (RRT) should be adopted for offshore oil and gas projects because it could provide greater incentives to invest in exploration and development than royalties based on revenues from oil and gas production. Under a resource rent tax, a firm can deduct all of its operating and capital expenditures from its current revenues from a project.  If the operating and capital expenditures exceed current revenues, which will generally be the case in first few years of a project, the firm can carry these expenditures forward at a specified interest rate and deduct them from future revenues.  The base for a resource rent tax is the difference between the present value of the revenue stream from a project and the present value of its operating and capital expenditures or, in other words, the present value of the economic rent generated by the project. The average effective tax and royalty rate (AETRR) is the share of the economic rent generated by a project that is captured by the government through taxes and royalties. The marginal effective tax and royalty rate (METRR) measures in percentage terms the wedge that the tax and royalty system drives between the gross-of-tax rate of return earned by a marginal investment and the net-of-tax rate of return.  The METRR is a measure of the disincentives to invest in oil and gas projects that are created by the tax and royalty system. We estimate that replacing the current 13 per cent royalty with a 45 per cent RRT would maintain the current AETRR and reduce the METRR for exploration and development activities in the Romania offshore sector by more than 12 percentage points, from approximately 18 per cent to less than six per cent, resulting in a significant reduction in the distortions created by the tax and royalty system.  This switch would generate approximately the same, or perhaps even more, revenue for the Romanian government, as our analysis of a prototype offshore natural gas project illustrates. If it adopts a RRT for the offshore projects, the Romanian government should consider the adoption of a RRT rate that varies with the price of oil or the price of natural gas. The variable RRT rate means that, as the price of the resource increases and more economic rent is generated, the government is able to capture a larger share of a larger pie. Having an explicit formula for how the RRT rate will vary with the price of the resource also reduces uncertainty about future RRT rates if prices are different in the future. In order to smooth its revenue stream from offshore projects and to improve public acceptance of the adoption of a resource rent tax, the Romanian governments could retain a royalty on revenues from offshore production in the initial years of a project, which would be credited against the project’s future RRT liabilities. This would change the time profile of the government’s revenue stream, relative to a pure RRT, but the present value of the revenue stream would remain the same. Another complimentary fiscal instrument that can be used to achieve a similar goal as the RRT is to award exploration rights through competitive auctions. The more geological information is available to potential investors, the closer their bids will reflect the expected rent from developing the resource, allowing the government to capture without distortions a significant portion of the rents generated by oil and gas extraction projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信