InteligÊncia人工司法可解释性:如razÕes pÚblicas e a justiÇa " ex machina "

S. Pádua
{"title":"InteligÊncia人工司法可解释性:如razÕes pÚblicas e a justiÇa \" ex machina \"","authors":"S. Pádua","doi":"10.36592/9786581110468-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to analyze the initial aspects of the right to explanability of judicial decisions by artificial intelligence. The proposed solution is the design of a fundamental right of explainability. The right to explainability is based on democratic pluralism arising from public reasons. The research approach was multidisciplinary. The research analyzed the normative acts produced on the subject, theoretical categories of political justice in Rawls' think), and scientific studies on the limits and possibilities of explainability in artificial intelligence. This study based on qualitative research, through exploratory-descriptive analysis about Law and Computer Science. The results demonstrate: the necessary intersection between the theory of justice (approach to public reasons) and the techniques of explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) to guarantee the democratic legitimacy of judicial AI systems; and the definition of a fundamental right to explanability of the judicial decision by AI. Therefore, Artificial Intelligence to support the court decision (human-machine hybrid thinking) works with limitations imposed by technology. Thus, the explicability of legal AI needs to be recognized as a right. This will enable plurality and justice in society.","PeriodicalId":305915,"journal":{"name":"Anais da VIII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2021). Volume I","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL JUDICIAL E EXPLICABILIDADE: AS RAZÕES PÚBLICAS E A JUSTIÇA “EX MACHINA”\",\"authors\":\"S. Pádua\",\"doi\":\"10.36592/9786581110468-32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to analyze the initial aspects of the right to explanability of judicial decisions by artificial intelligence. The proposed solution is the design of a fundamental right of explainability. The right to explainability is based on democratic pluralism arising from public reasons. The research approach was multidisciplinary. The research analyzed the normative acts produced on the subject, theoretical categories of political justice in Rawls' think), and scientific studies on the limits and possibilities of explainability in artificial intelligence. This study based on qualitative research, through exploratory-descriptive analysis about Law and Computer Science. The results demonstrate: the necessary intersection between the theory of justice (approach to public reasons) and the techniques of explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) to guarantee the democratic legitimacy of judicial AI systems; and the definition of a fundamental right to explanability of the judicial decision by AI. Therefore, Artificial Intelligence to support the court decision (human-machine hybrid thinking) works with limitations imposed by technology. Thus, the explicability of legal AI needs to be recognized as a right. This will enable plurality and justice in society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais da VIII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2021). Volume I\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais da VIII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2021). Volume I\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36592/9786581110468-32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da VIII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2021). Volume I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36592/9786581110468-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是分析人工智能司法判决可解释权的初始方面。建议的解决方案是设计可解释性的基本权利。可解释权的基础是源于公共原因的民主多元化。研究方法是多学科的。本研究分析了对主体产生的规范性行为、罗尔斯思想中政治正义的理论范畴以及对人工智能中可解释性的局限性和可能性的科学研究。本研究在定性研究的基础上,通过对法学与计算机科学的探索性-描述性分析。结果表明:正义理论(公共原因方法)与可解释人工智能(xAI)技术之间的必要交集,以保证司法人工智能系统的民主合法性;以及人工智能解释司法判决的基本权利的定义。因此,人工智能支持法院判决(人机混合思维)的工作受到技术的限制。因此,法律人工智能的可解释性需要被视为一种权利。这将使社会实现多元化和正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL JUDICIAL E EXPLICABILIDADE: AS RAZÕES PÚBLICAS E A JUSTIÇA “EX MACHINA”
The purpose of this article is to analyze the initial aspects of the right to explanability of judicial decisions by artificial intelligence. The proposed solution is the design of a fundamental right of explainability. The right to explainability is based on democratic pluralism arising from public reasons. The research approach was multidisciplinary. The research analyzed the normative acts produced on the subject, theoretical categories of political justice in Rawls' think), and scientific studies on the limits and possibilities of explainability in artificial intelligence. This study based on qualitative research, through exploratory-descriptive analysis about Law and Computer Science. The results demonstrate: the necessary intersection between the theory of justice (approach to public reasons) and the techniques of explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) to guarantee the democratic legitimacy of judicial AI systems; and the definition of a fundamental right to explanability of the judicial decision by AI. Therefore, Artificial Intelligence to support the court decision (human-machine hybrid thinking) works with limitations imposed by technology. Thus, the explicability of legal AI needs to be recognized as a right. This will enable plurality and justice in society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信