F. Farrokhi, Sneha Priyadarshini Honnabovi, M. Pavone, K. Al-Eryani, O. Abousamra, R. Enciso
{"title":"骨髓干细胞核心减压治疗股骨头坏死","authors":"F. Farrokhi, Sneha Priyadarshini Honnabovi, M. Pavone, K. Al-Eryani, O. Abousamra, R. Enciso","doi":"10.29245/2768-5365/2020/3.1113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if Core Decompression (CD) with Bone Marrow Stem Cells (BMSC) is more effective in treating Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH) compared to CD. Authors used Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and hand-searched references through January 2020, identifying relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's handbook. Fifty-four abstracts were screened, and eight RCTs (five at high and three at unclear risk of bias) with 432 patients were included. Meta-analyses found statistically significant improvement in Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months (Difference in Means [DM]=10.065;95% Confidence Interval [CI]=4.509 to 15.622; p<0.001) and pain intensity at 24 months (DM=-7.364;95% CI=-12.113 to -2.615;p=0.002) in CD+BMSC group compared to CD alone although these results may not be clinically significant. Risk of Total Hip Replacement (THR) in patients receiving CD+BMSC was 33.4% lower than in CD group though not significant (RR=0.666; 95% CI=0.355 to 1.250;p=0.206). Though meta-analyses found the addition of BMSC to CD significantly improves clinical outcomes (HHS and pain intensity) compared to CD only, evidence was of moderate/low quality due to high risk of bias, imprecision, and small sample sizes. Further research is needed to confirm the results.","PeriodicalId":111293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Core Decompression with Bone Marrow Stem Cells for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head\",\"authors\":\"F. Farrokhi, Sneha Priyadarshini Honnabovi, M. Pavone, K. Al-Eryani, O. Abousamra, R. Enciso\",\"doi\":\"10.29245/2768-5365/2020/3.1113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if Core Decompression (CD) with Bone Marrow Stem Cells (BMSC) is more effective in treating Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH) compared to CD. Authors used Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and hand-searched references through January 2020, identifying relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's handbook. Fifty-four abstracts were screened, and eight RCTs (five at high and three at unclear risk of bias) with 432 patients were included. Meta-analyses found statistically significant improvement in Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months (Difference in Means [DM]=10.065;95% Confidence Interval [CI]=4.509 to 15.622; p<0.001) and pain intensity at 24 months (DM=-7.364;95% CI=-12.113 to -2.615;p=0.002) in CD+BMSC group compared to CD alone although these results may not be clinically significant. Risk of Total Hip Replacement (THR) in patients receiving CD+BMSC was 33.4% lower than in CD group though not significant (RR=0.666; 95% CI=0.355 to 1.250;p=0.206). Though meta-analyses found the addition of BMSC to CD significantly improves clinical outcomes (HHS and pain intensity) compared to CD only, evidence was of moderate/low quality due to high risk of bias, imprecision, and small sample sizes. Further research is needed to confirm the results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy\",\"volume\":\"166 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29245/2768-5365/2020/3.1113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29245/2768-5365/2020/3.1113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作者进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定骨髓干细胞(BMSC)核心减压(CD)治疗股骨骨坏死(ONFH)是否比CD更有效。作者使用Cochrane图书馆,EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science和手工检索文献,截至2020年1月,确定相关的随机对照试验(rct)。采用Cochrane手册评估偏倚风险。筛选了54篇摘要,纳入了8项随机对照试验(5项高偏倚风险,3项不明确偏倚风险),共432例患者。meta分析发现Harris髋关节评分(HHS)在12个月时有统计学意义的改善(mean Difference [DM]=10.065;95%可信区间[CI]=4.509 ~ 15.622;p<0.001)和24个月时疼痛强度(DM=-7.364;95% CI=-12.113至-2.615;p=0.002),尽管这些结果可能没有临床意义。接受CD+BMSC的患者发生全髋关节置换术(THR)的风险比CD组低33.4%,但无统计学意义(RR=0.666;95% CI=0.355 ~ 1.250;p=0.206)。虽然荟萃分析发现,与仅CD相比,BMSC加入CD可显著改善临床结果(HHS和疼痛强度),但由于高偏倚风险、不精确和样本量小,证据质量为中等/低。需要进一步的研究来证实这一结果。
Core Decompression with Bone Marrow Stem Cells for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head
The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if Core Decompression (CD) with Bone Marrow Stem Cells (BMSC) is more effective in treating Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH) compared to CD. Authors used Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and hand-searched references through January 2020, identifying relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's handbook. Fifty-four abstracts were screened, and eight RCTs (five at high and three at unclear risk of bias) with 432 patients were included. Meta-analyses found statistically significant improvement in Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months (Difference in Means [DM]=10.065;95% Confidence Interval [CI]=4.509 to 15.622; p<0.001) and pain intensity at 24 months (DM=-7.364;95% CI=-12.113 to -2.615;p=0.002) in CD+BMSC group compared to CD alone although these results may not be clinically significant. Risk of Total Hip Replacement (THR) in patients receiving CD+BMSC was 33.4% lower than in CD group though not significant (RR=0.666; 95% CI=0.355 to 1.250;p=0.206). Though meta-analyses found the addition of BMSC to CD significantly improves clinical outcomes (HHS and pain intensity) compared to CD only, evidence was of moderate/low quality due to high risk of bias, imprecision, and small sample sizes. Further research is needed to confirm the results.