{"title":"社交化:为什么NCAA强迫大学监控学生运动员的社交媒体","authors":"J. Hopkins, K. Hopkins, B. Whelton","doi":"10.5195/TLP.2013.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On June 21, 2011, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) charged the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) with a number of NCAA legislation violations, including “not adequately and consistently monitor[ing] social networking activity that visibly illustrated potential amateurism violations within the football program[.]” While the NCAA’s bylaws regarding member institution conduct indirectly impacts social media oversight, the NCAA’s lack of a social media monitoring policy creates uncertainty as to how member institutions should deal with potential violations of a non-existing policy. Coupled with concerns about their public image, tort liability, and their student-athletes’ safety, NCAA member institutions must develop a social media monitoring policy that does not infringe on constitutional free speech rights or more specific social media privacy laws. Ultimately, monitoring publicly available social media might be the safest and the best way to protect the institutions’ interests without violating their student-athletes’ legal rights. Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ \n table.MsoNormalTable \n {mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\"; \n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \n mso-style-noshow:yes; \n mso-style-priority:99; \n mso-style-parent:\"\"; \n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; \n mso-para-margin:0in; \n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \n mso-pagination:widow-orphan; \n font-size:12.0pt; \n font-family:\"Cambria\",\"serif\"; \n mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria; \n mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; \n mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria; \n mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}","PeriodicalId":185385,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Being Social: Why the NCAA Has Forced Universities to Monitor Student-Athletes’ Social Media\",\"authors\":\"J. Hopkins, K. Hopkins, B. Whelton\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/TLP.2013.116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On June 21, 2011, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) charged the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) with a number of NCAA legislation violations, including “not adequately and consistently monitor[ing] social networking activity that visibly illustrated potential amateurism violations within the football program[.]” While the NCAA’s bylaws regarding member institution conduct indirectly impacts social media oversight, the NCAA’s lack of a social media monitoring policy creates uncertainty as to how member institutions should deal with potential violations of a non-existing policy. Coupled with concerns about their public image, tort liability, and their student-athletes’ safety, NCAA member institutions must develop a social media monitoring policy that does not infringe on constitutional free speech rights or more specific social media privacy laws. Ultimately, monitoring publicly available social media might be the safest and the best way to protect the institutions’ interests without violating their student-athletes’ legal rights. Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ \\n table.MsoNormalTable \\n {mso-style-name:\\\"Table Normal\\\"; \\n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \\n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \\n mso-style-noshow:yes; \\n mso-style-priority:99; \\n mso-style-parent:\\\"\\\"; \\n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; \\n mso-para-margin:0in; \\n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \\n mso-pagination:widow-orphan; \\n font-size:12.0pt; \\n font-family:\\\"Cambria\\\",\\\"serif\\\"; \\n mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria; \\n mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; \\n mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria; \\n mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}\",\"PeriodicalId\":185385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/TLP.2013.116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/TLP.2013.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
2011年6月21日,全国大学体育协会(NCAA)指控北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校(UNC)违反了多项NCAA法规,包括“没有充分和持续地监控社交网络活动,这些活动明显表明了足球项目中潜在的业余违规行为”。“虽然NCAA关于成员机构行为的章程间接影响了社交媒体监督,但NCAA缺乏社交媒体监控政策,这给成员机构应该如何处理潜在的违规行为带来了不确定性。再加上对公众形象、侵权责任和学生运动员安全的担忧,NCAA成员机构必须制定一项不侵犯宪法言论自由权或更具体的社交媒体隐私法的社交媒体监控政策。最终,监控公开可用的社交媒体可能是在不侵犯学生运动员合法权利的情况下保护机构利益的最安全、最好的方法。正常0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /*样式定义*/表。mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0;mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0;mso-style-noshow:是的;mso-style-priority: 99;mso-style-parent:“”;mso- font - family:宋体;mso-para-margin: 0;mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt;mso-pagination: widow-orphan;字体大小:12.0分;字体类型:“威尔士”、“衬”;mso-ascii-font-family:威尔士;mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-hansi-font-family:威尔士;mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin;}
Being Social: Why the NCAA Has Forced Universities to Monitor Student-Athletes’ Social Media
On June 21, 2011, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) charged the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) with a number of NCAA legislation violations, including “not adequately and consistently monitor[ing] social networking activity that visibly illustrated potential amateurism violations within the football program[.]” While the NCAA’s bylaws regarding member institution conduct indirectly impacts social media oversight, the NCAA’s lack of a social media monitoring policy creates uncertainty as to how member institutions should deal with potential violations of a non-existing policy. Coupled with concerns about their public image, tort liability, and their student-athletes’ safety, NCAA member institutions must develop a social media monitoring policy that does not infringe on constitutional free speech rights or more specific social media privacy laws. Ultimately, monitoring publicly available social media might be the safest and the best way to protect the institutions’ interests without violating their student-athletes’ legal rights. Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Cambria","serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}