{"title":"当所有权在当前出售的未来付款权中转移时——从纽约法的视角","authors":"Yudong Yu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3657436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores when titles to the rights to payment transfer from a seller to a buyer in a true sale of future incomes. The paper finds that under New York Law, rights do not transfer from the seller to the buyer at the formation of the sale contract; nor do rights skip seller and jump to the buyer when those rights are created. The finding implies that A present sale of future incomes may not be an effective means to create a bankruptcy remoteness effect.","PeriodicalId":314810,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Rules of the Game (Topic)","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Titles Transfer in a Present Sale of Future Rights to Payment – From Perspective of New York law\",\"authors\":\"Yudong Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3657436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores when titles to the rights to payment transfer from a seller to a buyer in a true sale of future incomes. The paper finds that under New York Law, rights do not transfer from the seller to the buyer at the formation of the sale contract; nor do rights skip seller and jump to the buyer when those rights are created. The finding implies that A present sale of future incomes may not be an effective means to create a bankruptcy remoteness effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Rules of the Game (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"166 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Rules of the Game (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3657436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Rules of the Game (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3657436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
When Titles Transfer in a Present Sale of Future Rights to Payment – From Perspective of New York law
This paper explores when titles to the rights to payment transfer from a seller to a buyer in a true sale of future incomes. The paper finds that under New York Law, rights do not transfer from the seller to the buyer at the formation of the sale contract; nor do rights skip seller and jump to the buyer when those rights are created. The finding implies that A present sale of future incomes may not be an effective means to create a bankruptcy remoteness effect.