语音处理中几种距离度量的实验比较

L. Everson, W. Penzhorn
{"title":"语音处理中几种距离度量的实验比较","authors":"L. Everson, W. Penzhorn","doi":"10.1109/COMSIG.1988.49293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A description is given of a number of different distance measures between speech segments commonly used in the analysis and recognition of speech. The measures considered include spectral slope, correlation coefficients, log likelihood ration, cepstral, weighted ceptstral, and modified distance measures. These metrics were tested on either the linear predictive coding (LPC) or the frequency spectrum depending on the type of measurement. Work reported elsewhere, was also considered and experimentally verified. The tests were performed on speech in a noisy background in Gaussian and in high-frequency noise. All the measures were compared using the same speech database. These evaluations show that by eliminating unwanted information in speech segments, the distance metric can be made more robust in noisy environments. It was found that threshold 1/ sigma -weighted distance metric, where sigma is the standard deviation of a given cepstral coefficient, is generally the best speech distance metric to use in most types of noisy environments. Some of the other metrics work better in isolated areas, but do not show the same high general recognition result.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":339020,"journal":{"name":"COMSIG 88@m_Southern African Conference on Communications and Signal Processing. Proceedings","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental comparison on several distance measures for speech processing applications\",\"authors\":\"L. Everson, W. Penzhorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMSIG.1988.49293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A description is given of a number of different distance measures between speech segments commonly used in the analysis and recognition of speech. The measures considered include spectral slope, correlation coefficients, log likelihood ration, cepstral, weighted ceptstral, and modified distance measures. These metrics were tested on either the linear predictive coding (LPC) or the frequency spectrum depending on the type of measurement. Work reported elsewhere, was also considered and experimentally verified. The tests were performed on speech in a noisy background in Gaussian and in high-frequency noise. All the measures were compared using the same speech database. These evaluations show that by eliminating unwanted information in speech segments, the distance metric can be made more robust in noisy environments. It was found that threshold 1/ sigma -weighted distance metric, where sigma is the standard deviation of a given cepstral coefficient, is generally the best speech distance metric to use in most types of noisy environments. Some of the other metrics work better in isolated areas, but do not show the same high general recognition result.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":339020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMSIG 88@m_Southern African Conference on Communications and Signal Processing. Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMSIG 88@m_Southern African Conference on Communications and Signal Processing. Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSIG.1988.49293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMSIG 88@m_Southern African Conference on Communications and Signal Processing. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSIG.1988.49293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

描述了语音分析和识别中常用的语音段之间的一些不同距离度量。考虑的措施包括光谱斜率,相关系数,对数似然比,倒谱,加权倒谱和修改的距离措施。根据测量类型,在线性预测编码(LPC)或频谱上对这些度量进行了测试。其他地方报告的工作也被考虑和实验验证。测试分别在高斯噪声背景和高频噪声背景下进行。使用相同的语音数据库对所有测量值进行比较。这些评估表明,通过消除语音片段中不需要的信息,距离度量可以在嘈杂环境中变得更加鲁棒。研究发现,阈值1/ sigma加权距离度量,其中sigma是给定倒谱系数的标准差,通常是大多数类型噪声环境中使用的最佳语音距离度量。其他一些指标在孤立的区域效果更好,但没有显示出同样高的一般识别结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental comparison on several distance measures for speech processing applications
A description is given of a number of different distance measures between speech segments commonly used in the analysis and recognition of speech. The measures considered include spectral slope, correlation coefficients, log likelihood ration, cepstral, weighted ceptstral, and modified distance measures. These metrics were tested on either the linear predictive coding (LPC) or the frequency spectrum depending on the type of measurement. Work reported elsewhere, was also considered and experimentally verified. The tests were performed on speech in a noisy background in Gaussian and in high-frequency noise. All the measures were compared using the same speech database. These evaluations show that by eliminating unwanted information in speech segments, the distance metric can be made more robust in noisy environments. It was found that threshold 1/ sigma -weighted distance metric, where sigma is the standard deviation of a given cepstral coefficient, is generally the best speech distance metric to use in most types of noisy environments. Some of the other metrics work better in isolated areas, but do not show the same high general recognition result.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信