介于或超越法律秩序

S. Taekema
{"title":"介于或超越法律秩序","authors":"S. Taekema","doi":"10.1017/9781108609654.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper address the idea of interlegality from the perspective of legal theory. Talking about interlegality inevitably leads to a consideration of legal orders between which linkages and connections appear. Interlegality is sometimes described as a process of mixing elements of different legal orders to create a new legal order. In this contribution, the concept of ‘legal order’ is reconsidered in light of the discussions of interlegality. More specifically, a notion of legal order as a system is contrasted with legal order as an interactional practice. Interlegality highlights plurality and tension which is problematic in a systemic view of legal order, and can be absorbed in an interactional view. However, taking the practice view to its limits may lead to a collapse of the notion of order altogether. Given the prominence of the value of coherence in legal thought, complete abandonment of the notion of legal order seems a step too far. This contribution considers how an interactional view of order may incorporate elements of systemic order in order to do justice to interlegality as a phenomenon of our legal world, ranging from the local to the transnational context.","PeriodicalId":258048,"journal":{"name":"The Challenge of Inter-Legality","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between or Beyond Legal Orders\",\"authors\":\"S. Taekema\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108609654.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper address the idea of interlegality from the perspective of legal theory. Talking about interlegality inevitably leads to a consideration of legal orders between which linkages and connections appear. Interlegality is sometimes described as a process of mixing elements of different legal orders to create a new legal order. In this contribution, the concept of ‘legal order’ is reconsidered in light of the discussions of interlegality. More specifically, a notion of legal order as a system is contrasted with legal order as an interactional practice. Interlegality highlights plurality and tension which is problematic in a systemic view of legal order, and can be absorbed in an interactional view. However, taking the practice view to its limits may lead to a collapse of the notion of order altogether. Given the prominence of the value of coherence in legal thought, complete abandonment of the notion of legal order seems a step too far. This contribution considers how an interactional view of order may incorporate elements of systemic order in order to do justice to interlegality as a phenomenon of our legal world, ranging from the local to the transnational context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Challenge of Inter-Legality\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Challenge of Inter-Legality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108609654.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Challenge of Inter-Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108609654.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文从法理的角度探讨了跨法性的概念。谈论非法性不可避免地导致对法律秩序的考虑,这些法律秩序之间出现了联系和联系。跨法性有时被描述为混合不同法律秩序的要素以创造一种新的法律秩序的过程。在这篇文章中,“法律秩序”的概念是根据对国际法的讨论而重新考虑的。更具体地说,作为一种制度的法律秩序概念与作为一种相互作用的实践的法律秩序形成了对比。跨法性突出了多元性和张力,这在法律秩序的系统观点中是有问题的,但可以在相互作用的观点中吸收。然而,将实践观点置于其极限可能会导致秩序概念的彻底崩溃。考虑到连贯性在法律思想中的重要性,完全放弃法律秩序的概念似乎是走得太远了。这篇文章考虑了秩序的相互作用观如何包含系统秩序的要素,以便公正地对待作为我们法律世界现象的跨合法性,范围从地方到跨国背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between or Beyond Legal Orders
This paper address the idea of interlegality from the perspective of legal theory. Talking about interlegality inevitably leads to a consideration of legal orders between which linkages and connections appear. Interlegality is sometimes described as a process of mixing elements of different legal orders to create a new legal order. In this contribution, the concept of ‘legal order’ is reconsidered in light of the discussions of interlegality. More specifically, a notion of legal order as a system is contrasted with legal order as an interactional practice. Interlegality highlights plurality and tension which is problematic in a systemic view of legal order, and can be absorbed in an interactional view. However, taking the practice view to its limits may lead to a collapse of the notion of order altogether. Given the prominence of the value of coherence in legal thought, complete abandonment of the notion of legal order seems a step too far. This contribution considers how an interactional view of order may incorporate elements of systemic order in order to do justice to interlegality as a phenomenon of our legal world, ranging from the local to the transnational context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信