中国股市是否反映了流动性不足?

Jun Liu, Kai Wu, Lan Zheng
{"title":"中国股市是否反映了流动性不足?","authors":"Jun Liu, Kai Wu, Lan Zheng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3787113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although liquidity has received wide attention in asset pricing literature over the past decades, how stock liquidity is priced in emerging markets remains unclear. We find that liquidity plays an important role in explaining the cross-section and time-series variation in expected returns by incorporating multi-dimensional liquidity proxies in the spread, depth, and trading activity. The predictive power persists after controlling the several conventional pricing factors. We also find that the high illiquidity quintile generates higher monthly risk-adjusted returns than the low illiquidity quintile, ranging from 3.2% to 8.4% per month. The results are robust to alternative stock liquidity measures and sampling criteria. Our findings highlight the profitability of liquidity-based trading strategy in the Chinese stock market.","PeriodicalId":287077,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","volume":"13 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Illiquidity Priced in the Chinese Stock Market?\",\"authors\":\"Jun Liu, Kai Wu, Lan Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3787113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although liquidity has received wide attention in asset pricing literature over the past decades, how stock liquidity is priced in emerging markets remains unclear. We find that liquidity plays an important role in explaining the cross-section and time-series variation in expected returns by incorporating multi-dimensional liquidity proxies in the spread, depth, and trading activity. The predictive power persists after controlling the several conventional pricing factors. We also find that the high illiquidity quintile generates higher monthly risk-adjusted returns than the low illiquidity quintile, ranging from 3.2% to 8.4% per month. The results are robust to alternative stock liquidity measures and sampling criteria. Our findings highlight the profitability of liquidity-based trading strategy in the Chinese stock market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"13 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3787113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3787113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管流动性在过去几十年的资产定价文献中受到了广泛关注,但新兴市场的股票流动性如何定价仍不清楚。我们发现,通过纳入价差、深度和交易活动的多维流动性代理,流动性在解释预期收益的横截面和时间序列变化方面发挥了重要作用。在控制了几个常规定价因素后,预测能力仍然存在。我们还发现,高流动性不足的五分之一组产生的月度风险调整回报率高于低流动性不足的五分之一组,每月的回报率从3.2%到8.4%不等。结果对替代股票流动性措施和抽样标准具有鲁棒性。我们的研究结果突出了基于流动性的交易策略在中国股市的盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Illiquidity Priced in the Chinese Stock Market?
Although liquidity has received wide attention in asset pricing literature over the past decades, how stock liquidity is priced in emerging markets remains unclear. We find that liquidity plays an important role in explaining the cross-section and time-series variation in expected returns by incorporating multi-dimensional liquidity proxies in the spread, depth, and trading activity. The predictive power persists after controlling the several conventional pricing factors. We also find that the high illiquidity quintile generates higher monthly risk-adjusted returns than the low illiquidity quintile, ranging from 3.2% to 8.4% per month. The results are robust to alternative stock liquidity measures and sampling criteria. Our findings highlight the profitability of liquidity-based trading strategy in the Chinese stock market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信