非自愿住院

C. Ryan, Jane Bartels
{"title":"非自愿住院","authors":"C. Ryan, Jane Bartels","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198839262.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter outlines a series of arguments designed to answer possibly the most important ethical question in psychiatry: under what circumstances, if any, is it ethically justifiable to treat people with clinical features of mental illness, despite their objection? We argue that involuntary inpatient treatment is ethically justified, but only in circumstances where: the objection to treatment was made without decision-making capacity; there is no reason to believe that the person would have objected had he or she been competent; the treatment will protect the person from serious harms (when balancing these with any harms associated with the treatment); and involuntary treatment represents the avenue for protection least restrictive of the person’s freedom. Having established a model for ethically justified involuntary inpatient psychiatric treatment, we examine how it can be applied to two real-world cases.","PeriodicalId":302592,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Ethics","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Involuntary hospitalization\",\"authors\":\"C. Ryan, Jane Bartels\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780198839262.003.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chapter outlines a series of arguments designed to answer possibly the most important ethical question in psychiatry: under what circumstances, if any, is it ethically justifiable to treat people with clinical features of mental illness, despite their objection? We argue that involuntary inpatient treatment is ethically justified, but only in circumstances where: the objection to treatment was made without decision-making capacity; there is no reason to believe that the person would have objected had he or she been competent; the treatment will protect the person from serious harms (when balancing these with any harms associated with the treatment); and involuntary treatment represents the avenue for protection least restrictive of the person’s freedom. Having established a model for ethically justified involuntary inpatient psychiatric treatment, we examine how it can be applied to two real-world cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Ethics\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198839262.003.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198839262.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章概述了一系列的争论,旨在回答可能是精神病学中最重要的伦理问题:在什么情况下,如果有的话,治疗具有精神疾病临床特征的人在伦理上是合理的,而不顾他们的反对?我们认为,非自愿住院治疗在道德上是合理的,但只有在以下情况下才有理由:对治疗的反对是在没有决策能力的情况下提出的;没有理由相信,如果此人有能力,他或她会反对;治疗将保护患者免受严重伤害(在平衡这些伤害与治疗相关的任何伤害时);非自愿治疗是对个人自由限制最少的保护途径。建立了一个道德上合理的非自愿住院精神病治疗模型,我们研究如何将其应用于两个现实世界的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Involuntary hospitalization
The chapter outlines a series of arguments designed to answer possibly the most important ethical question in psychiatry: under what circumstances, if any, is it ethically justifiable to treat people with clinical features of mental illness, despite their objection? We argue that involuntary inpatient treatment is ethically justified, but only in circumstances where: the objection to treatment was made without decision-making capacity; there is no reason to believe that the person would have objected had he or she been competent; the treatment will protect the person from serious harms (when balancing these with any harms associated with the treatment); and involuntary treatment represents the avenue for protection least restrictive of the person’s freedom. Having established a model for ethically justified involuntary inpatient psychiatric treatment, we examine how it can be applied to two real-world cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信