新闻实践中的信息法律和电子交易困境

Indi Hikami
{"title":"新闻实践中的信息法律和电子交易困境","authors":"Indi Hikami","doi":"10.15408/jsj.v4i1.25846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law No. 19 of 2016 electronic information and transactions has caused an overlapping issue in journalism. However, there is Law No. 40 of 1999, which regulates and guarantees press freedom. Unfortunately, many journalists have become a victim of the Law itself. Such a condition will distort Indonesia’s public sphere, where journalism is a supportive instrument. As per Foucault’s panopticon theory, the researcher sees this Law as a supervision instrument to monitor the activity of Indonesia’s press so that they do not produce such a critical news point of view and eventually threaten the authorities. This article uses a narrative approach to break down the relationship between Indonesian Electronic Information and Transactions. The result shows that this Law can either be a supervision instrument. Nevertheless, on the other hand, for journalists, this will potentially limit their freedom since the authorities see their activity as a threat to the government.","PeriodicalId":338967,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik","volume":"327 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dilema Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dalam Praktik Jurnalisme: Tinjauan dari Teori Panoptikon\",\"authors\":\"Indi Hikami\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/jsj.v4i1.25846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Law No. 19 of 2016 electronic information and transactions has caused an overlapping issue in journalism. However, there is Law No. 40 of 1999, which regulates and guarantees press freedom. Unfortunately, many journalists have become a victim of the Law itself. Such a condition will distort Indonesia’s public sphere, where journalism is a supportive instrument. As per Foucault’s panopticon theory, the researcher sees this Law as a supervision instrument to monitor the activity of Indonesia’s press so that they do not produce such a critical news point of view and eventually threaten the authorities. This article uses a narrative approach to break down the relationship between Indonesian Electronic Information and Transactions. The result shows that this Law can either be a supervision instrument. Nevertheless, on the other hand, for journalists, this will potentially limit their freedom since the authorities see their activity as a threat to the government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik\",\"volume\":\"327 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/jsj.v4i1.25846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jsj.v4i1.25846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年第19号《电子信息与交易法》在新闻业引发了重叠问题。但是,1999年第40号法律规定并保障新闻自由。不幸的是,许多记者已经成为法律本身的受害者。这样的状况将扭曲印尼的公共领域,在那里,新闻是一种辅助工具。根据福柯的panopticon理论,研究者将这项法律视为一种监督工具,以监控印尼媒体的活动,使他们不会产生这种批判性的新闻观点,并最终威胁到当局。本文使用叙述的方法来分解印尼电子资讯与交易之间的关系。结果表明,该法可以作为一种监督工具。然而,另一方面,对于记者来说,这可能会限制他们的自由,因为当局将他们的活动视为对政府的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dilema Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dalam Praktik Jurnalisme: Tinjauan dari Teori Panoptikon
Law No. 19 of 2016 electronic information and transactions has caused an overlapping issue in journalism. However, there is Law No. 40 of 1999, which regulates and guarantees press freedom. Unfortunately, many journalists have become a victim of the Law itself. Such a condition will distort Indonesia’s public sphere, where journalism is a supportive instrument. As per Foucault’s panopticon theory, the researcher sees this Law as a supervision instrument to monitor the activity of Indonesia’s press so that they do not produce such a critical news point of view and eventually threaten the authorities. This article uses a narrative approach to break down the relationship between Indonesian Electronic Information and Transactions. The result shows that this Law can either be a supervision instrument. Nevertheless, on the other hand, for journalists, this will potentially limit their freedom since the authorities see their activity as a threat to the government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信