我们能相信信息融合的主观逻辑吗?

17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) Pub Date : 2014-07-07 DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.22865

J. Dezert, A. Tchamova, Deqiang Han, J. Tacnet

{"title":"我们能相信信息融合的主观逻辑吗?","authors":"J. Dezert, A. Tchamova, Deqiang Han, J. Tacnet","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.22865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we provide a deep examination of the main bases of Subjective Logic (SL) and reveal serious problems with them. A new interesting alternative way for building a normal coarsened basic belief assignment from a refined one is also proposed. The defects in the SL fusion rule and the problems in the link between opinion and Beta probability density functions are also analyzed. Some numerical examples and related analyses are provided to justify our viewpoints.","PeriodicalId":136004,"journal":{"name":"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can we trust subjective logic for information fusion?\",\"authors\":\"J. Dezert, A. Tchamova, Deqiang Han, J. Tacnet\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.22865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we provide a deep examination of the main bases of Subjective Logic (SL) and reveal serious problems with them. A new interesting alternative way for building a normal coarsened basic belief assignment from a refined one is also proposed. The defects in the SL fusion rule and the problems in the link between opinion and Beta probability density functions are also analyzed. Some numerical examples and related analyses are provided to justify our viewpoints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.22865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.22865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

本文对主观逻辑的主要基础进行了深入的考察，揭示了主观逻辑存在的一些严重问题。本文还提出了一种新的有趣的替代方法，用于从一个精炼的基本信念分配中构建一个正常的粗化基本信念分配。分析了SL融合规则的缺陷以及意见与Beta概率密度函数之间的联系存在的问题。给出了一些数值算例和相关分析来证明我们的观点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Can we trust subjective logic for information fusion?

In this paper, we provide a deep examination of the main bases of Subjective Logic (SL) and reveal serious problems with them. A new interesting alternative way for building a normal coarsened basic belief assignment from a refined one is also proposed. The defects in the SL fusion rule and the problems in the link between opinion and Beta probability density functions are also analyzed. Some numerical examples and related analyses are provided to justify our viewpoints.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)

自引率

0.00%

发文量