LDPC码的平均最小和译码

N. Axvig, D. Dreher, K. Morrison, E. Psota, L. C. Pérez, J.L. Walker
{"title":"LDPC码的平均最小和译码","authors":"N. Axvig, D. Dreher, K. Morrison, E. Psota, L. C. Pérez, J.L. Walker","doi":"10.1109/TURBOCODING.2008.4658725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulations have shown that the outputs of min-sum (MS) decoding generally behave in one of two ways: either the output vector eventually stabilizes at a codeword or it eventually cycles through a finite set of vectors that may include both codewords and non-codewords. The latter behavior has significantly contributed to the difficulty in studying the performance of this decoder. To overcome this problem, a new decoder, average min-sum (AMS), is proposed; this decoder outputs the average of the MS output vectors over a finite set of iterations. Simulations comparing MS, AMS, linear programming (LP) decoding, and maximum likelihood (ML) decoding are presented, illustrating the relative performances of each of these decoders. In general, MS and AMS have comparable word error rates; however, in the simulation of a code with large block length, AMS has a significantly lower bit error rate. Finally, AMS pseudocodewords are introduced and their relationship to graph cover and LP pseudocodewords is explored, with particular focus on the AMS pseudocodewords of regular LDPC codes and cycle codes.","PeriodicalId":284046,"journal":{"name":"2008 5th International Symposium on Turbo Codes and Related Topics","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Average min-sum decoding of LDPC codes\",\"authors\":\"N. Axvig, D. Dreher, K. Morrison, E. Psota, L. C. Pérez, J.L. Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TURBOCODING.2008.4658725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Simulations have shown that the outputs of min-sum (MS) decoding generally behave in one of two ways: either the output vector eventually stabilizes at a codeword or it eventually cycles through a finite set of vectors that may include both codewords and non-codewords. The latter behavior has significantly contributed to the difficulty in studying the performance of this decoder. To overcome this problem, a new decoder, average min-sum (AMS), is proposed; this decoder outputs the average of the MS output vectors over a finite set of iterations. Simulations comparing MS, AMS, linear programming (LP) decoding, and maximum likelihood (ML) decoding are presented, illustrating the relative performances of each of these decoders. In general, MS and AMS have comparable word error rates; however, in the simulation of a code with large block length, AMS has a significantly lower bit error rate. Finally, AMS pseudocodewords are introduced and their relationship to graph cover and LP pseudocodewords is explored, with particular focus on the AMS pseudocodewords of regular LDPC codes and cycle codes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 5th International Symposium on Turbo Codes and Related Topics\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 5th International Symposium on Turbo Codes and Related Topics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TURBOCODING.2008.4658725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 5th International Symposium on Turbo Codes and Related Topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TURBOCODING.2008.4658725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

仿真表明,最小和(MS)解码的输出通常表现为两种方式之一:要么输出向量最终稳定在码字处,要么最终循环通过有限的向量集,其中可能包括码字和非码字。后一种行为极大地增加了研究该解码器性能的难度。为了克服这个问题,提出了一种新的解码器——平均最小和解码器(AMS);该解码器在有限的迭代集上输出MS输出向量的平均值。仿真比较了MS、AMS、线性规划(LP)解码和最大似然(ML)解码,说明了每种解码器的相对性能。一般来说,MS和AMS的单词错误率相当;然而,在大码块长度的模拟中,AMS具有明显较低的误码率。最后,介绍了AMS伪码字,并探讨了它们与图盖和LP伪码字的关系,重点讨论了正则LDPC码和循环码的AMS伪码字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Average min-sum decoding of LDPC codes
Simulations have shown that the outputs of min-sum (MS) decoding generally behave in one of two ways: either the output vector eventually stabilizes at a codeword or it eventually cycles through a finite set of vectors that may include both codewords and non-codewords. The latter behavior has significantly contributed to the difficulty in studying the performance of this decoder. To overcome this problem, a new decoder, average min-sum (AMS), is proposed; this decoder outputs the average of the MS output vectors over a finite set of iterations. Simulations comparing MS, AMS, linear programming (LP) decoding, and maximum likelihood (ML) decoding are presented, illustrating the relative performances of each of these decoders. In general, MS and AMS have comparable word error rates; however, in the simulation of a code with large block length, AMS has a significantly lower bit error rate. Finally, AMS pseudocodewords are introduced and their relationship to graph cover and LP pseudocodewords is explored, with particular focus on the AMS pseudocodewords of regular LDPC codes and cycle codes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信