Roeya -E-Rasul, B. Akram, Z. Abidin, F. A. Khalid, Sheraz Raza, K. Khalid
{"title":"羊膜与海藻酸钙作为裂厚皮肤移植供区敷料的评价:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Roeya -E-Rasul, B. Akram, Z. Abidin, F. A. Khalid, Sheraz Raza, K. Khalid","doi":"10.37018/ouan1021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) covers patient’s primary wound, but, at the expense of a donor-wound which heals by secondary intention. This study evaluated the efficacy of amnion and calcium alginate dressings at STSG donor sites in terms of healing duration, patient comfort and incidence of infection. \nPatients and methods: An open label randomised control trial was conducted during October 2018 to May 2019. Total 60 patients, aged 20-45 years, were randomly allocated to two equal groups. Amnion was applied to 30 donor sites in Group A and calcium alginate in 30 donor sites in Group B. Patients were phone-called on 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days and donor site pain scored using numerical rating scale. Donor site was opened on 10th postoperative day and signs of infection assessed. Lastly, the day on which donor site healed, revealing an epithelialized wound, was noted. \nResults: Group A included 30 patients (11 females, 19 males) having mean age of 31.23 years and Group B included 30 patients (12 females, 11 males) having mean age of 31.30 years. Average pain scores on 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days were 7.6, 6.6 and 4.4 in Group A and it was 8.2, 6.5 and 4.4 in Group B. Two cases of amnion, 4 of calcium alginate got infected. Average healing duration was 11 days in Group A; and it was 14 days in Group B (p-value = 0.000). \nConclusion: Amnion shows quicker healing and better pain control than calcium alginate.","PeriodicalId":349972,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of amnion versus calcium alginate as split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing: A randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Roeya -E-Rasul, B. Akram, Z. Abidin, F. A. Khalid, Sheraz Raza, K. Khalid\",\"doi\":\"10.37018/ouan1021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) covers patient’s primary wound, but, at the expense of a donor-wound which heals by secondary intention. This study evaluated the efficacy of amnion and calcium alginate dressings at STSG donor sites in terms of healing duration, patient comfort and incidence of infection. \\nPatients and methods: An open label randomised control trial was conducted during October 2018 to May 2019. Total 60 patients, aged 20-45 years, were randomly allocated to two equal groups. Amnion was applied to 30 donor sites in Group A and calcium alginate in 30 donor sites in Group B. Patients were phone-called on 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days and donor site pain scored using numerical rating scale. Donor site was opened on 10th postoperative day and signs of infection assessed. Lastly, the day on which donor site healed, revealing an epithelialized wound, was noted. \\nResults: Group A included 30 patients (11 females, 19 males) having mean age of 31.23 years and Group B included 30 patients (12 females, 11 males) having mean age of 31.30 years. Average pain scores on 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days were 7.6, 6.6 and 4.4 in Group A and it was 8.2, 6.5 and 4.4 in Group B. Two cases of amnion, 4 of calcium alginate got infected. Average healing duration was 11 days in Group A; and it was 14 days in Group B (p-value = 0.000). \\nConclusion: Amnion shows quicker healing and better pain control than calcium alginate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37018/ouan1021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37018/ouan1021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:裂厚皮肤移植(STSG)覆盖患者的原发伤口,但以牺牲供体伤口的二次愈合为代价。本研究评估了羊膜和海藻酸钙敷料在STSG供区愈合时间、患者舒适度和感染发生率方面的疗效。患者和方法:2018年10月至2019年5月进行了一项开放标签随机对照试验。60例患者,年龄20 ~ 45岁,随机分为两组。A组30个供区应用羊膜,b组30个供区应用海藻酸钙,于术后第1、3、7天对患者进行电话随访,采用数值评分量表对供区疼痛进行评分。术后第10天开放供区,评估感染体征。最后,记录了供体部位愈合的日期,显示出一个上皮化的伤口。结果:A组患者30例(女11例,男19例),平均年龄31.23岁;B组患者30例(女12例,男11例),平均年龄31.30岁。A组术后第1、3、7天的平均疼痛评分分别为7.6、6.6、4.4,b组分别为8.2、6.5、4.4。羊膜感染2例,海藻酸钙感染4例。A组平均愈合时间11 d;B组为14 d (p值= 0.000)。结论:羊膜比海藻酸钙愈合快,疼痛控制好。
Evaluation of amnion versus calcium alginate as split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing: A randomised controlled trial
Background: Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) covers patient’s primary wound, but, at the expense of a donor-wound which heals by secondary intention. This study evaluated the efficacy of amnion and calcium alginate dressings at STSG donor sites in terms of healing duration, patient comfort and incidence of infection.
Patients and methods: An open label randomised control trial was conducted during October 2018 to May 2019. Total 60 patients, aged 20-45 years, were randomly allocated to two equal groups. Amnion was applied to 30 donor sites in Group A and calcium alginate in 30 donor sites in Group B. Patients were phone-called on 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days and donor site pain scored using numerical rating scale. Donor site was opened on 10th postoperative day and signs of infection assessed. Lastly, the day on which donor site healed, revealing an epithelialized wound, was noted.
Results: Group A included 30 patients (11 females, 19 males) having mean age of 31.23 years and Group B included 30 patients (12 females, 11 males) having mean age of 31.30 years. Average pain scores on 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days were 7.6, 6.6 and 4.4 in Group A and it was 8.2, 6.5 and 4.4 in Group B. Two cases of amnion, 4 of calcium alginate got infected. Average healing duration was 11 days in Group A; and it was 14 days in Group B (p-value = 0.000).
Conclusion: Amnion shows quicker healing and better pain control than calcium alginate.