脑动脉图谱自动标记归一化方法的评价

Kazuyoshi Jin, Ko Kitamura, S. Mugikura, N. Mori, M. Ohta, H. Anzai
{"title":"脑动脉图谱自动标记归一化方法的评价","authors":"Kazuyoshi Jin, Ko Kitamura, S. Mugikura, N. Mori, M. Ohta, H. Anzai","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-71097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An existence probability atlas has been used for automatic labeling of cerebral arteries. However, the number of arteries varies frequently because of image quality and individual variation of the artery structure. To moderate the influence of number imbalance on labeling accuracy, we propose a new normalized atlas for automatic labeling of cerebral artery centerlines.\n The number of arteries, which was obtained from magnetic resonance angiography, varies from 11 to 46 among the artery sites. Based on the centerline and diameter, the arterial volume was reconstructed into a voxel space for each subject. After superimposing arteries from 46 subjects, three normalization methods were compared: dividing by the number of subjects (N), by N and the arterial length (L), and by N and the arterial volume (V). To compare the labeling accuracy and precision, the summation of probability and labeling method was also used.\n The accuracy of all normalization methods was > 85% in all arteries. The precision improved in some parts, with the atlas normalized by N-L and by N-V. The use of N-L and N-V changed the relative value of the existence probability among the parts. Consequently, some normalization methods changed the tendency toward misclassification, which changed the precision.","PeriodicalId":314012,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Biomedical and Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Normalization Methods in a Cerebral Artery Atlas for Automatic Labeling\",\"authors\":\"Kazuyoshi Jin, Ko Kitamura, S. Mugikura, N. Mori, M. Ohta, H. Anzai\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2021-71097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n An existence probability atlas has been used for automatic labeling of cerebral arteries. However, the number of arteries varies frequently because of image quality and individual variation of the artery structure. To moderate the influence of number imbalance on labeling accuracy, we propose a new normalized atlas for automatic labeling of cerebral artery centerlines.\\n The number of arteries, which was obtained from magnetic resonance angiography, varies from 11 to 46 among the artery sites. Based on the centerline and diameter, the arterial volume was reconstructed into a voxel space for each subject. After superimposing arteries from 46 subjects, three normalization methods were compared: dividing by the number of subjects (N), by N and the arterial length (L), and by N and the arterial volume (V). To compare the labeling accuracy and precision, the summation of probability and labeling method was also used.\\n The accuracy of all normalization methods was > 85% in all arteries. The precision improved in some parts, with the atlas normalized by N-L and by N-V. The use of N-L and N-V changed the relative value of the existence probability among the parts. Consequently, some normalization methods changed the tendency toward misclassification, which changed the precision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 5: Biomedical and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 5: Biomedical and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Biomedical and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

存在概率图谱用于脑动脉的自动标记。然而,由于图像质量和动脉结构的个体差异,动脉的数量经常变化。为了缓和数量不平衡对标记精度的影响,提出了一种新的规范化脑动脉中心线自动标记图谱。磁共振血管造影显示动脉的数量在11到46个之间。基于中心线和直径,将动脉体积重构为每个受试者的体素空间。对46例受试者的动脉进行叠加后,比较三种归一化方法:除以受试者人数(N)、除以N和动脉长度(L)、除以N和动脉体积(V)。为了比较标记的准确性和精密度,还采用概率和标记方法的总和。所有动脉归一化方法的准确率均> 85%。通过N-L和N-V归一化图谱,在一定程度上提高了精度。N-L和N-V的使用改变了零件之间存在概率的相对值。因此,一些归一化方法改变了误分类的倾向,从而改变了精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Normalization Methods in a Cerebral Artery Atlas for Automatic Labeling
An existence probability atlas has been used for automatic labeling of cerebral arteries. However, the number of arteries varies frequently because of image quality and individual variation of the artery structure. To moderate the influence of number imbalance on labeling accuracy, we propose a new normalized atlas for automatic labeling of cerebral artery centerlines. The number of arteries, which was obtained from magnetic resonance angiography, varies from 11 to 46 among the artery sites. Based on the centerline and diameter, the arterial volume was reconstructed into a voxel space for each subject. After superimposing arteries from 46 subjects, three normalization methods were compared: dividing by the number of subjects (N), by N and the arterial length (L), and by N and the arterial volume (V). To compare the labeling accuracy and precision, the summation of probability and labeling method was also used. The accuracy of all normalization methods was > 85% in all arteries. The precision improved in some parts, with the atlas normalized by N-L and by N-V. The use of N-L and N-V changed the relative value of the existence probability among the parts. Consequently, some normalization methods changed the tendency toward misclassification, which changed the precision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信