让特斯拉停放你的特斯拉:司机信任半自动汽车

Kathryn Tomzcak, Adam Pelter, Corey Gutierrez, Thomas Stretch, Daniel Hilf, Bianca Donadio, N. Tenhundfeld, E. D. de Visser, Chad C. Tossell
{"title":"让特斯拉停放你的特斯拉:司机信任半自动汽车","authors":"Kathryn Tomzcak, Adam Pelter, Corey Gutierrez, Thomas Stretch, Daniel Hilf, Bianca Donadio, N. Tenhundfeld, E. D. de Visser, Chad C. Tossell","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reality of highly automated vehicles on every road seems increasingly possible. With companies such as Tesla, Google, Toyota, and many others racing to provide a fully autonomous vehicle, the need for research on self-driving cars has never been greater. Until recently, however, most of this research had been conducted in a sterile lab environment devoid of any real consequences. For that reason, we join a host of other researchers in evaluating human-automation interaction in the real world associated with miscalibrated trust. As previous research has shown, drivers can either over- or under trust a vehicle's automated features. To evaluate this in these in a realistic setting, we had participants use the Autopark feature in a Tesla Model X or park the car themselves in both parallel and perpendicular scenarios. Parking times, driver trust, self-confidence in their own ability to park, and workload were all evaluated throughout the experiment. Preliminary analyses into the data are reported. Trends for the interactions between parking condition (self versus auto) and the parking type (parallel versus perpendicular) emerged for both trust/self-confidence and workload. Data collection is still ongoing to evaluate whether these trends hold, and if they emerge as significant. In all, this study contributes to the growing body of literature which seeks to understand the complexities of human-automation interaction in the real world.","PeriodicalId":265421,"journal":{"name":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let Tesla Park Your Tesla: Driver Trust in a Semi-Automated Car\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Tomzcak, Adam Pelter, Corey Gutierrez, Thomas Stretch, Daniel Hilf, Bianca Donadio, N. Tenhundfeld, E. D. de Visser, Chad C. Tossell\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The reality of highly automated vehicles on every road seems increasingly possible. With companies such as Tesla, Google, Toyota, and many others racing to provide a fully autonomous vehicle, the need for research on self-driving cars has never been greater. Until recently, however, most of this research had been conducted in a sterile lab environment devoid of any real consequences. For that reason, we join a host of other researchers in evaluating human-automation interaction in the real world associated with miscalibrated trust. As previous research has shown, drivers can either over- or under trust a vehicle's automated features. To evaluate this in these in a realistic setting, we had participants use the Autopark feature in a Tesla Model X or park the car themselves in both parallel and perpendicular scenarios. Parking times, driver trust, self-confidence in their own ability to park, and workload were all evaluated throughout the experiment. Preliminary analyses into the data are reported. Trends for the interactions between parking condition (self versus auto) and the parking type (parallel versus perpendicular) emerged for both trust/self-confidence and workload. Data collection is still ongoing to evaluate whether these trends hold, and if they emerge as significant. In all, this study contributes to the growing body of literature which seeks to understand the complexities of human-automation interaction in the real world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

高度自动化车辆在每条道路上行驶的现实似乎越来越有可能。随着特斯拉(Tesla)、谷歌(Google)、丰田(Toyota)等公司竞相推出全自动驾驶汽车,研究自动驾驶汽车的需求从未像现在这样迫切。然而,直到最近,大多数这类研究都是在无菌的实验室环境中进行的,没有任何真正的后果。出于这个原因,我们与许多其他研究人员一起评估现实世界中与错误校准信任相关的人-自动化交互。正如之前的研究表明的那样,司机可能对汽车的自动功能过于信任,也可能过于信任。为了在现实环境中评估这一点,我们让参与者使用特斯拉Model X的自动停车功能,或者让他们自己在平行和垂直的场景中停车。在整个实验过程中,停车时间、司机信任、对自己停车能力的自信以及工作量都被评估。报告了对数据的初步分析。在信任/自信和工作量方面,停车条件(自我与自动)和停车类型(平行与垂直)之间的相互作用趋势都出现了。目前仍在收集数据,以评估这些趋势是否成立,以及它们是否具有重要意义。总之,这项研究为越来越多的文献做出了贡献,这些文献试图理解现实世界中人类与自动化交互的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let Tesla Park Your Tesla: Driver Trust in a Semi-Automated Car
The reality of highly automated vehicles on every road seems increasingly possible. With companies such as Tesla, Google, Toyota, and many others racing to provide a fully autonomous vehicle, the need for research on self-driving cars has never been greater. Until recently, however, most of this research had been conducted in a sterile lab environment devoid of any real consequences. For that reason, we join a host of other researchers in evaluating human-automation interaction in the real world associated with miscalibrated trust. As previous research has shown, drivers can either over- or under trust a vehicle's automated features. To evaluate this in these in a realistic setting, we had participants use the Autopark feature in a Tesla Model X or park the car themselves in both parallel and perpendicular scenarios. Parking times, driver trust, self-confidence in their own ability to park, and workload were all evaluated throughout the experiment. Preliminary analyses into the data are reported. Trends for the interactions between parking condition (self versus auto) and the parking type (parallel versus perpendicular) emerged for both trust/self-confidence and workload. Data collection is still ongoing to evaluate whether these trends hold, and if they emerge as significant. In all, this study contributes to the growing body of literature which seeks to understand the complexities of human-automation interaction in the real world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信