家庭价值观:社会工作者和普通美国人

Kenneth R. Wedel, R. Wedel, J. Rosenthal
{"title":"家庭价值观:社会工作者和普通美国人","authors":"Kenneth R. Wedel, R. Wedel, J. Rosenthal","doi":"10.30845/aijss.v8n2p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes selected family values among a national sample of 483 social workers holding membership in the National Association of Social Workers (NASW). The family values chosen were identified in questions contained in the General Social Survey (GSS) administered to a national sample of United States adults. When compared with this sample (n = 1,974), social workers were more supportive of diverse family forms, more accepting of suicide and abortion, more likely to affirm the effectiveness of same-sex parenting couples, but less likely to affirm hard spanking of children. Controlling for socio-demographic variables, however, differences for a question concerning working mothers with children having warm relationships with their children disappeared, as did other questions about parent/children relationships. Similarly, differences on questions related to suicide and abortion were diminished with controls. Addressed are implications for practice considering family values which differ in most cases from the families’ in the general population that social workers will potentially serve.","PeriodicalId":421989,"journal":{"name":"American International Journal of Social Science","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Values: Social Workers and the General American Population\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth R. Wedel, R. Wedel, J. Rosenthal\",\"doi\":\"10.30845/aijss.v8n2p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes selected family values among a national sample of 483 social workers holding membership in the National Association of Social Workers (NASW). The family values chosen were identified in questions contained in the General Social Survey (GSS) administered to a national sample of United States adults. When compared with this sample (n = 1,974), social workers were more supportive of diverse family forms, more accepting of suicide and abortion, more likely to affirm the effectiveness of same-sex parenting couples, but less likely to affirm hard spanking of children. Controlling for socio-demographic variables, however, differences for a question concerning working mothers with children having warm relationships with their children disappeared, as did other questions about parent/children relationships. Similarly, differences on questions related to suicide and abortion were diminished with controls. Addressed are implications for practice considering family values which differ in most cases from the families’ in the general population that social workers will potentially serve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American International Journal of Social Science\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American International Journal of Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30845/aijss.v8n2p1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American International Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/aijss.v8n2p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章描述了在483名持有全国社会工作者协会(NASW)会员资格的社会工作者的全国样本中选择的家庭价值观。所选择的家庭价值观是在对美国成年人的全国抽样进行的综合社会调查(GSS)中所包含的问题中确定的。与此样本(n = 1974)相比,社会工作者更支持多样化的家庭形式,更接受自杀和堕胎,更有可能肯定同性父母的有效性,但不太可能肯定严厉打屁股的孩子。然而,在控制了社会人口变量之后,关于有孩子的职业母亲与孩子之间关系良好的问题的差异消失了,关于父母/孩子关系的其他问题也消失了。同样,在自杀和堕胎相关问题上的差异在对照组中也有所减少。讨论了在实践中考虑家庭价值观的影响,在大多数情况下,家庭价值观与社会工作者可能服务的一般人群中的家庭价值观不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family Values: Social Workers and the General American Population
This article describes selected family values among a national sample of 483 social workers holding membership in the National Association of Social Workers (NASW). The family values chosen were identified in questions contained in the General Social Survey (GSS) administered to a national sample of United States adults. When compared with this sample (n = 1,974), social workers were more supportive of diverse family forms, more accepting of suicide and abortion, more likely to affirm the effectiveness of same-sex parenting couples, but less likely to affirm hard spanking of children. Controlling for socio-demographic variables, however, differences for a question concerning working mothers with children having warm relationships with their children disappeared, as did other questions about parent/children relationships. Similarly, differences on questions related to suicide and abortion were diminished with controls. Addressed are implications for practice considering family values which differ in most cases from the families’ in the general population that social workers will potentially serve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信