用纵波反射剖面的三分量地震仪估计纵波速度的简单方法

T. Ohtaki, N. Kano, T. Yokokura
{"title":"用纵波反射剖面的三分量地震仪估计纵波速度的简单方法","authors":"T. Ohtaki, N. Kano, T. Yokokura","doi":"10.4294/ZISIN.63.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seismic reflection profiling using P-to-SV converted waves with 3-component seismometers has an advantage for examining deeper S-wave velocity profile compared with other methods such as SH-wave reflection profiling. In spite of this advantage, the reflection profiling with 3-component seismometers has not been popular because it requires three-times more channels than reflection profiling with vertical-component seismometers, which is popular for examining P-wave velocity profile. In our previous paper, we showed a possibility of examining S-wave velocity profile by analyzing P-to-SV reflected waves observed at one 3-component seismometer together with P-wave reflection profiling. Although the method in the previous paper has ambiguity to obtain S-wave velocity, the approach is attractive because one additional 3-component seismometer requires little additional cost. In this paper, we show the validity of the approach using another method. This new method is easy to apply, if P-wave velocity profile was already determined using vertical component reflection profiling. We picked P-to-SV reflected waves on observed radial-component records, and adjusted theoretical travel-time curves to the observed waves at one 3-component seismometer. P-wave velocity profile and depths of discontinuities were fixed to the result of P-wave reflection profiling. When the travel time was calculated, a ratio of P-wave velocity to S-wave velocity was assumed to be the same for all layers. The ratio for well-matched theoretical time was considered as the ratio of vertical travel times of S-wave to P-wave from the surface to the reflected layer. Shear-wave velocity for each layer was calculated from the ratio. Slowness of the P-to-SV reflected wave at large offsets depends on P-wave velocity and a depth of the reflector, but shows little dependence on S-wave velocity at large offsets. This characteristic makes it possible to separate the influence of the reflector depth and of S-wave velocity on travel-time curves of the reflected waves. Tests for simple horizontal layer models and dipping layer models showed that S-wave velocities were obtained within about 10% in error, and that obtained S-wave velocity was stable in errors of P-wave velocity and of an inclination of the layer. We applied this method to a previous seismic reflection survey with 3-component seismometers which was carried out at Fuchu-city, Tokyo. Previous study analyzed P-and S-wave velocity profiles to 2-km depth using P-and converted-wave reflection profiling. Another survey also examined P-and S-wave velocity profiles near the survey line using VSP method. We selected one station near the VSP well among the survey stations, and analyzed the data using the method. S-wave velocity profile that we obtained was consistent with the profiles of the previous studies to 2-km depth. Only one 3-component seismometer was necessary for this method with P-wave reflection profiling. Our results show that this method provides adequate shear-wave velocity profile with little additional cost.","PeriodicalId":332254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan","volume":"324 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simple Estimation Method of S-wave Velocity by Using One 3-Component Seismometer with P-wave Reflection Profiling\",\"authors\":\"T. Ohtaki, N. Kano, T. Yokokura\",\"doi\":\"10.4294/ZISIN.63.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Seismic reflection profiling using P-to-SV converted waves with 3-component seismometers has an advantage for examining deeper S-wave velocity profile compared with other methods such as SH-wave reflection profiling. In spite of this advantage, the reflection profiling with 3-component seismometers has not been popular because it requires three-times more channels than reflection profiling with vertical-component seismometers, which is popular for examining P-wave velocity profile. In our previous paper, we showed a possibility of examining S-wave velocity profile by analyzing P-to-SV reflected waves observed at one 3-component seismometer together with P-wave reflection profiling. Although the method in the previous paper has ambiguity to obtain S-wave velocity, the approach is attractive because one additional 3-component seismometer requires little additional cost. In this paper, we show the validity of the approach using another method. This new method is easy to apply, if P-wave velocity profile was already determined using vertical component reflection profiling. We picked P-to-SV reflected waves on observed radial-component records, and adjusted theoretical travel-time curves to the observed waves at one 3-component seismometer. P-wave velocity profile and depths of discontinuities were fixed to the result of P-wave reflection profiling. When the travel time was calculated, a ratio of P-wave velocity to S-wave velocity was assumed to be the same for all layers. The ratio for well-matched theoretical time was considered as the ratio of vertical travel times of S-wave to P-wave from the surface to the reflected layer. Shear-wave velocity for each layer was calculated from the ratio. Slowness of the P-to-SV reflected wave at large offsets depends on P-wave velocity and a depth of the reflector, but shows little dependence on S-wave velocity at large offsets. This characteristic makes it possible to separate the influence of the reflector depth and of S-wave velocity on travel-time curves of the reflected waves. Tests for simple horizontal layer models and dipping layer models showed that S-wave velocities were obtained within about 10% in error, and that obtained S-wave velocity was stable in errors of P-wave velocity and of an inclination of the layer. We applied this method to a previous seismic reflection survey with 3-component seismometers which was carried out at Fuchu-city, Tokyo. Previous study analyzed P-and S-wave velocity profiles to 2-km depth using P-and converted-wave reflection profiling. Another survey also examined P-and S-wave velocity profiles near the survey line using VSP method. We selected one station near the VSP well among the survey stations, and analyzed the data using the method. S-wave velocity profile that we obtained was consistent with the profiles of the previous studies to 2-km depth. Only one 3-component seismometer was necessary for this method with P-wave reflection profiling. Our results show that this method provides adequate shear-wave velocity profile with little additional cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan\",\"volume\":\"324 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4294/ZISIN.63.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4294/ZISIN.63.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与其他方法(如sh波反射剖面)相比,使用p - sv转换波和3分量地震仪的地震反射剖面在检测更深的s波速度剖面方面具有优势。尽管有这样的优势,但三分量地震仪的反射剖面并不受欢迎,因为它需要比垂直分量地震仪的反射剖面多三倍的通道,而垂直分量地震仪通常用于检测纵波速度剖面。在我们之前的论文中,我们展示了通过分析在一个三分量地震仪上观测到的p - sv反射波以及p波反射剖面来检测s波速度剖面的可能性。虽然前文中的方法在获得横波速度方面存在歧义,但由于增加一个三分量地震仪所需的额外费用很少,因此该方法具有吸引力。在本文中,我们用另一种方法证明了该方法的有效性。如果已经用垂直分量反射剖面确定了纵波速度剖面,那么这种新方法很容易应用。我们在观测到的径向分量记录上选取了p - sv反射波,并将理论走时曲线与一台三分量地震仪的观测波进行了调整。纵波速度剖面和不连续面深度被固定在纵波反射剖面上。在计算走时时,假设各层纵波速度与横波速度之比相同。拟合理论时间的比值即为横波与纵波从地表到反射层的垂直传播时间之比。根据比值计算各层的横波速度。在大偏移距处,纵波到纵波的慢度取决于纵波速度和反射器的深度,但在大偏移距处,对横波速度的依赖性很小。这一特性使得分离反射面深度和横波速度对反射波走时曲线的影响成为可能。对简单水平层模型和倾斜层模型的试验表明,得到的横波速度误差在10%左右,纵波速度误差和层倾角误差稳定。我们将这种方法应用于以前在东京福中市进行的三分量地震仪的地震反射调查。先前的研究使用纵波和转换波反射剖面分析了2公里深度的纵波和横波速度剖面。另一项调查还使用VSP方法检查了测量线附近的纵波和横波速度剖面。选取了VSP井附近的1个监测站,采用该方法对数据进行了分析。得到的2 km纵波速度剖面与前人研究的纵波速度剖面基本一致。该方法采用纵波反射剖面法,只需要一台三分量地震仪。结果表明,该方法能以较低的成本获得较好的横波速度剖面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simple Estimation Method of S-wave Velocity by Using One 3-Component Seismometer with P-wave Reflection Profiling
Seismic reflection profiling using P-to-SV converted waves with 3-component seismometers has an advantage for examining deeper S-wave velocity profile compared with other methods such as SH-wave reflection profiling. In spite of this advantage, the reflection profiling with 3-component seismometers has not been popular because it requires three-times more channels than reflection profiling with vertical-component seismometers, which is popular for examining P-wave velocity profile. In our previous paper, we showed a possibility of examining S-wave velocity profile by analyzing P-to-SV reflected waves observed at one 3-component seismometer together with P-wave reflection profiling. Although the method in the previous paper has ambiguity to obtain S-wave velocity, the approach is attractive because one additional 3-component seismometer requires little additional cost. In this paper, we show the validity of the approach using another method. This new method is easy to apply, if P-wave velocity profile was already determined using vertical component reflection profiling. We picked P-to-SV reflected waves on observed radial-component records, and adjusted theoretical travel-time curves to the observed waves at one 3-component seismometer. P-wave velocity profile and depths of discontinuities were fixed to the result of P-wave reflection profiling. When the travel time was calculated, a ratio of P-wave velocity to S-wave velocity was assumed to be the same for all layers. The ratio for well-matched theoretical time was considered as the ratio of vertical travel times of S-wave to P-wave from the surface to the reflected layer. Shear-wave velocity for each layer was calculated from the ratio. Slowness of the P-to-SV reflected wave at large offsets depends on P-wave velocity and a depth of the reflector, but shows little dependence on S-wave velocity at large offsets. This characteristic makes it possible to separate the influence of the reflector depth and of S-wave velocity on travel-time curves of the reflected waves. Tests for simple horizontal layer models and dipping layer models showed that S-wave velocities were obtained within about 10% in error, and that obtained S-wave velocity was stable in errors of P-wave velocity and of an inclination of the layer. We applied this method to a previous seismic reflection survey with 3-component seismometers which was carried out at Fuchu-city, Tokyo. Previous study analyzed P-and S-wave velocity profiles to 2-km depth using P-and converted-wave reflection profiling. Another survey also examined P-and S-wave velocity profiles near the survey line using VSP method. We selected one station near the VSP well among the survey stations, and analyzed the data using the method. S-wave velocity profile that we obtained was consistent with the profiles of the previous studies to 2-km depth. Only one 3-component seismometer was necessary for this method with P-wave reflection profiling. Our results show that this method provides adequate shear-wave velocity profile with little additional cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信